Went from a Lexus to a Mazda..
#1
Went from a Lexus to a Mazda..
Specifically, from a 2008 Lexus IS250 AWD with Luxury and Premium packages, to a 2018 Mazda CX-9 Signature AWD. I'm just writing this because I've got a little free time at work.
First thing's first, I loved my IS250, and if I could have kept it, I would have. Like most IS250 owners, my only complaint about the car was it's lack of power. This wasn't a big deal for me as I didn't really need power in the city, but I did want it to handle better, which is why I lowered it and upgraded the wheels and tires. Again, if I didn't have to upgrade, I'd probably drive the IS into the ground, and I'd be happy doing it.
Why go from a sedan to a 7-seat crossover?
The main reason was the additional room. My girlfriend at the time (who is now my wife) wanted us to eventually move to a larger vehicle once we were expecting. She says she also feels safer in a bigger vehicle. I also got rid of my Lexus because I wasn't driving it as much after moving to Alberta (was working from home). My wife's Civic was cheaper to maintain and to fuel up, so we got rid of the IS250 and used the money to get our own place. Now with our six month old daughter, I'm glad we have the extra room.
Why not go to a GX, LX, or RX-L?
RX-L had just been announced when we had seriously started looking at vehicles, and it would have been too expensive to buy brand new. I also don't like the side profile of the current gen RX, specifically the black panel that extends behind the rear doors. Used GX was a consideration, and I likely would have gone that route over a 3-row 2015 4runner. LX was too expensive for me.
Any regrets?
I do miss the electronic telescopic tilting steering wheel that my IS250 had, such a nice feature that made the car feel more expensive than it actually was. The rear sunshade was also another feature that I really didn't get much benefit from, but liked having. The 2IS exterior design is also hard to beat, it has such clean lines. I also miss driving a lowered car. I would have liked to get a car with more creature comforts such as a 360 camera, articulating back up lines, power folding mirrors, maybe even a panoramic moonroof. The Bose audio system in the Mazda also leaves something to be desired. It's good, but it's not great.
What does the CX-9 do better?
I love the exterior styling and the interior quality of the Mazda. Part of the reason I bought the CX-9 was the interior - it feels like I'm back in a Lexus every time I hop in the car. All of the small details are better executed (but this is to be expected when upgrading from a 10 year old car). One glaring exception is the stitching on the seats, some of it looks a little sloppy where the rear panel is stitched into the side. By far the biggest difference is the drive. The CX-9 handles better than the Civic. I would even go as far as saying that it handles just as good as the IS250 did. The CX-9 is also perfect for the city driving I do now. Mileage is great, all the torque is there when I need it, and there's no noticeable turbo lag. The HUD is also a nice touch, and I personally like Mazda's infotainment system as well. The Commander **** works very well, and I've found that I'd rather use the **** than fiddle with the screen.
Overall, I chose the CX-9 over other 3-row vehicles based primarily on price, driver engagement, and exterior/interior appeal. It doesn't have the widest range of features or the most cargo capacity, but its really fun to drive and I love the way it looks.
The old IS250:
The new CX-9:
First thing's first, I loved my IS250, and if I could have kept it, I would have. Like most IS250 owners, my only complaint about the car was it's lack of power. This wasn't a big deal for me as I didn't really need power in the city, but I did want it to handle better, which is why I lowered it and upgraded the wheels and tires. Again, if I didn't have to upgrade, I'd probably drive the IS into the ground, and I'd be happy doing it.
Why go from a sedan to a 7-seat crossover?
The main reason was the additional room. My girlfriend at the time (who is now my wife) wanted us to eventually move to a larger vehicle once we were expecting. She says she also feels safer in a bigger vehicle. I also got rid of my Lexus because I wasn't driving it as much after moving to Alberta (was working from home). My wife's Civic was cheaper to maintain and to fuel up, so we got rid of the IS250 and used the money to get our own place. Now with our six month old daughter, I'm glad we have the extra room.
Why not go to a GX, LX, or RX-L?
RX-L had just been announced when we had seriously started looking at vehicles, and it would have been too expensive to buy brand new. I also don't like the side profile of the current gen RX, specifically the black panel that extends behind the rear doors. Used GX was a consideration, and I likely would have gone that route over a 3-row 2015 4runner. LX was too expensive for me.
Any regrets?
I do miss the electronic telescopic tilting steering wheel that my IS250 had, such a nice feature that made the car feel more expensive than it actually was. The rear sunshade was also another feature that I really didn't get much benefit from, but liked having. The 2IS exterior design is also hard to beat, it has such clean lines. I also miss driving a lowered car. I would have liked to get a car with more creature comforts such as a 360 camera, articulating back up lines, power folding mirrors, maybe even a panoramic moonroof. The Bose audio system in the Mazda also leaves something to be desired. It's good, but it's not great.
What does the CX-9 do better?
I love the exterior styling and the interior quality of the Mazda. Part of the reason I bought the CX-9 was the interior - it feels like I'm back in a Lexus every time I hop in the car. All of the small details are better executed (but this is to be expected when upgrading from a 10 year old car). One glaring exception is the stitching on the seats, some of it looks a little sloppy where the rear panel is stitched into the side. By far the biggest difference is the drive. The CX-9 handles better than the Civic. I would even go as far as saying that it handles just as good as the IS250 did. The CX-9 is also perfect for the city driving I do now. Mileage is great, all the torque is there when I need it, and there's no noticeable turbo lag. The HUD is also a nice touch, and I personally like Mazda's infotainment system as well. The Commander **** works very well, and I've found that I'd rather use the **** than fiddle with the screen.
Overall, I chose the CX-9 over other 3-row vehicles based primarily on price, driver engagement, and exterior/interior appeal. It doesn't have the widest range of features or the most cargo capacity, but its really fun to drive and I love the way it looks.
The old IS250:
The new CX-9:
#3
Lead Lap
Nice new Mazda, looks good. I also had a 2008 IS250 AWD Luxury. It was a nice little car but once I had kids with a rear facing car seat I had zero leg room and I am not tall so I traded it for a LS460. I liked the car for the features it had but it wasn't a cheap car and it was grossly underpowered like you mentioned and it didn't get great gas mileage to offset the lack of power.
#4
Lexus Fanatic
Great choice! I hate that theres no V6 option but its the nicest 3 row non luxury crossover IMHO.
I really like Mazdas. Feel really upscale for the money.
I really like Mazdas. Feel really upscale for the money.
#5
Lexus Champion
Signature model being top of the line I think, no telescopic steering? Think you have adequate power from 2.5 liter turbo for that SUV? I just can't stand under pwered vehicle of any kind. I passed Mazda because the lack of engine choice. Otherwise it was fine to me. I heard Mazda CX9 wood trims are done by guitar craftman.
#6
Lexus Fanatic
Has telescopic steering but most companies don't do the power rise and slide away wheel like Lexus does.
#7
I convinced a friend of mine to replace his 2012 IS250 F-Sport with a CX-5 a couple months back. I went with him on the test drive and was blown away by how upmarket the Mazda feels. If Mazda offered a more powerful engine choice on the CX-5 or CX-9, I would definitely consider getting one. The CX-9 Signature with the red Nappa leather is beautiful!
Trending Topics
#8
Signature model being top of the line I think, no telescopic steering? Think you have adequate power from 2.5 liter turbo for that SUV? I just can't stand under pwered vehicle of any kind. I passed Mazda because the lack of engine choice. Otherwise it was fine to me. I heard Mazda CX9 wood trims are done by guitar craftman.
I convinced a friend of mine to replace his 2012 IS250 F-Sport with a CX-5 a couple months back. I went with him on the test drive and was blown away by how upmarket the Mazda feels. If Mazda offered a more powerful engine choice on the CX-5 or CX-9, I would definitely consider getting one. The CX-9 Signature with the red Nappa leather is beautiful!
#9
Lexus Fanatic
I don't know if your LS does it. But the newer Toyota or Lexus you can separate either the tilt height or tilt telescope or both. Toyota higher end stuff is the only brand I know that the power tilt and scope feature from a mainstream brand.
#10
Lead Lap
For me, I will never get another car without memory seats with power telescoping/tilt steering wheel. My current IS350 f-sport doesn’t have either of these features and for some reason in 2016 you couldn’t even get it as an option with the F-sport package which is ridiculous for a $50k car. Even my old 2008 IS250 had it. I thought it wasn’t a big deal when I leased it but since my wife and I switch cars often it’s a pain trying to squeeze in the seat after she uses it. I can’t wait until my lease is up next year to get rid of it. Of course now Lexus offers this feature with the F-sport package.
#13
Lexus Fanatic
Enjoy your new CX-9, sm1ke....and congratulations.
It's nice that you wanted to share your story with us (and Thanks). But you don't have to justify your purchase to us. If you like it, it suits your needs (and can afford it)....go for it. I did essentially what you did, myself, some 12 years ago, when I went from a 1Gen Lexus IS300 to a Subaru Outback. I was simply tired of dealing with RWD in the winter, and wanted something more suitable, at an affordable price. I thought that Subaru had (and still has) the best AWD system in the business, although they are not the equals of Honda and Toyota for reliability in some pother areas.
It's nice that you wanted to share your story with us (and Thanks). But you don't have to justify your purchase to us. If you like it, it suits your needs (and can afford it)....go for it. I did essentially what you did, myself, some 12 years ago, when I went from a 1Gen Lexus IS300 to a Subaru Outback. I was simply tired of dealing with RWD in the winter, and wanted something more suitable, at an affordable price. I thought that Subaru had (and still has) the best AWD system in the business, although they are not the equals of Honda and Toyota for reliability in some pother areas.
#14
Enjoy your new CX-9, sm1ke....and congratulations.
It's nice that you wanted to share your story with us (and Thanks). But you don't have to justify your purchase to us. If you like it, it suits your needs (and can afford it)....go for it. I did essentially what you did, myself, some 12 years ago, when I went from a 1Gen Lexus IS300 to a Subaru Outback. I was simply tired of dealing with RWD in the winter, and wanted something more suitable, at an affordable price. I thought that Subaru had (and still has) the best AWD system in the business, although they are not the equals of Honda and Toyota for reliability in some pother areas.
It's nice that you wanted to share your story with us (and Thanks). But you don't have to justify your purchase to us. If you like it, it suits your needs (and can afford it)....go for it. I did essentially what you did, myself, some 12 years ago, when I went from a 1Gen Lexus IS300 to a Subaru Outback. I was simply tired of dealing with RWD in the winter, and wanted something more suitable, at an affordable price. I thought that Subaru had (and still has) the best AWD system in the business, although they are not the equals of Honda and Toyota for reliability in some pother areas.
I had a coworker in Alberta who had a 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee Overland with the air suspension. She had a terrible experience with it. One of the air struts failed twice in two years. Her last straw was when she pulled into a gas station with her baby and tried to put the car in Park. The electronic shifter showed that she was in Park, but when she turned the car off, it started to roll away. She couldn't do anything, brakes wouldn't depress, transmission wouldn't shift because the car was off. She was panicking because they were rolling towards a propane or gasoline tank. Finally she started the car and was able to hit the brakes. After that she traded the car in, and guess what she got? A Subaru Outback They definitely have one of the best AWD systems available.