Notices
Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Innova

2019 Chevy Blazer

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 20, 2018 | 06:23 PM
  #106  
Toys4RJill's Avatar
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 35,474
Likes: 383
From: ON/NY
Default

Originally Posted by MattyG
That is incorrect. The K5 designation dates all the way back to the original Blazer in 1969, which was spun off from Chevrolet's C/K line of trucks. It is not a an internal code, but a model line designation.

The K5 fender emblem shows up on older full size Blazers and is part of a large aftermarket industry supplying restorers. Why would Chevy want to use K5 to differentiate the big Blazer from the baby Blazer when people could obviously see the difference in front of their eyes?
Perhaps all true, however in the marketing print ads I posted, it was just called the "Blazer" And the second gen was a K1500 Blazer I believe
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2018 | 09:01 AM
  #107  
SW17LS's Avatar
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
Active Streak: 60 Days
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 68,759
Likes: 4,080
From: Maryland
Default

Originally Posted by tex2670
Happy to be of service.
It takes a village lol
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2019 | 09:16 PM
  #108  
Toys4RJill's Avatar
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 35,474
Likes: 383
From: ON/NY
Default

I tried to warm up to this. But the interior is just not up to snuff. To think GM wants $55K CN for this thing is stunning. The Camaro dials for HVAC were cheesy. Hard to believe GM is slapping the Blazer name on this
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2019 | 12:05 AM
  #109  
Hoovey689's Avatar
Hoovey689
Thread Starter
2UR-GSE Owner
15 Year Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 42,476
Likes: 321
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
I tried to warm up to this. But the interior is just not up to snuff. To think GM wants $55K CN for this thing is stunning. The Camaro dials for HVAC were cheesy. Hard to believe GM is slapping the Blazer name on this
Simply a money grab trying to use a legendary name. Shame because the upcoming Bronco will be closer to the originals spirit. Would of loved to see Bronco and Blazer square off once again.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2019 | 02:50 AM
  #110  
Toys4RJill's Avatar
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 35,474
Likes: 383
From: ON/NY
Default

Originally Posted by Hoovey2411


Simply a money grab trying to use a legendary name. Shame because the upcoming Bronco will be closer to the originals spirit. Would of loved to see Bronco and Blazer square off once again.
Yes, agree. You are quite right.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2019 | 06:45 AM
  #111  
SW17LS's Avatar
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
Active Streak: 60 Days
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 68,759
Likes: 4,080
From: Maryland
Default

I'm not sure where the reverence for the Blazer name comes from. I've always found the S10/smaller Blazer to be a crappy vehicle when compared to similar Explorers, 4Runners, etc.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2019 | 06:51 AM
  #112  
Toys4RJill's Avatar
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 35,474
Likes: 383
From: ON/NY
Default

Originally Posted by SW17LS
I'm not sure where the reverence for the Blazer name comes from. I've always found the S10/smaller Blazer to be a crappy vehicle when compared to similar Explorers, 4Runners, etc.
It is important for people with the Blazer name, as the original name was from a truck based type of vehicle which kind of appeals to a different segment than the new model. The new Blazer is just like any other cross-over whereas if they made the Blazer off the Colorado/Canyon design, it would be more fitting.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2019 | 07:02 AM
  #113  
SW17LS's Avatar
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
Active Streak: 60 Days
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 68,759
Likes: 4,080
From: Maryland
Default

Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
It is important for people with the Blazer name, as the original name was from a truck based type of vehicle which kind of appeals to a different segment than the new model. The new Blazer is just like any other cross-over whereas if they made the Blazer off the Colorado/Canyon design, it would be more fitting.
And? So? The Explorer was a truck based product and now is a unibody crossover. The Pathfinder was a truck based product and now is a unibody crossover. Both the Explorer and the Pathfinder had/have strong followers of fans that don't like their new models.

A Blazer off the Colorado/Canyon platform wouldn't be the sort of vehicle buyers today want. I drove BOF SUVs for a long time, I don't want one again. Give me a unibody crossover any day, I can go more "off-roadey" with a Grand Cherokee, I can go more "on-Roady" with an Explorer, all while having a vehicle with much better space efficiency and driving comfort than I would with a BOF design.

Modern SUV buyers want crossovers by and large. Can't blame GM for building what buyers buy.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2019 | 07:10 AM
  #114  
Toys4RJill's Avatar
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 35,474
Likes: 383
From: ON/NY
Default

Originally Posted by SW17LS
A Blazer off the Colorado/Canyon platform wouldn't be the sort of vehicle buyers today want. I drove BOF SUVs for a long time, I don't want one again. Give me a unibody crossover any day, I can go more "off-roadey" with a Grand Cherokee, I can go more "on-Roady" with an Explorer, all while having a vehicle with much better space efficiency and driving comfort than I would with a BOF design.

Modern SUV buyers want crossovers by and large. Can't blame GM for building what buyers buy.
For sure.


Originally Posted by SW17LS
And? So? The Explorer was a truck based product and now is a unibody crossover. The Pathfinder was a truck based product and now is a unibody crossover. Both the Explorer and the Pathfinder had/have strong followers of fans that don't like their new models.
And you are right about the bold names, which would apply to the Blazer. But it just does not seem like a Blazer to me, based on what I remember what the Blazer used to be.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2019 | 07:11 AM
  #115  
SW17LS's Avatar
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
Active Streak: 60 Days
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 68,759
Likes: 4,080
From: Maryland
Default

Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
And you are right about the bold names, which would apply to the Blazer. But it just does not seem like a Blazer to me, based on what I remember what the Blazer used to be.
And everybody said the exact same thing about the Explorer and Pathfinder at the time. BUT, hundreds of thousands of people bought them. What matters is that people buy the product, not what people on some forum who drive examples 10+ years old say.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2019 | 07:45 AM
  #116  
-J-P-L-'s Avatar
-J-P-L-
Lexus Fanatic
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 7,864
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
Default

Gm has used the "Blazer" name every which way. It shouldn't be any surprise that is was reborn as a crossover when crossovers are the #1 segment. I think it depends perhaps on how old you are that determines what comes to mind when you hear "Blazer". I'm 40 and the model that first comes to mind is actually the Trailblazer (2002-). Then there's the S-10 Blazers I remember. The original K5 Blazer doesn't come to my mind at all. "Blazer" is whatever GM says is a Blazer in any given decade.

What is inexcusable is Mitsubishi using the Eclipse name for their latest crossover.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2019 | 08:23 AM
  #117  
Toys4RJill's Avatar
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 35,474
Likes: 383
From: ON/NY
Default

Originally Posted by -J-P-L-
Gm has used the "Blazer" name every which way. It shouldn't be any surprise that is was reborn as a crossover when crossovers are the #1 segment. I think it depends perhaps on how old you are that determines what comes to mind when you hear "Blazer". I'm 40 and the model that first comes to mind is actually the Trailblazer (2002-). Then there's the S-10 Blazers I remember. The original K5 Blazer doesn't come to my mind at all. "Blazer" is whatever GM says is a Blazer in any given decade.

What is inexcusable is Mitsubishi using the Eclipse name for their latest crossover.
I do agree with everything you are saying.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2019 | 05:12 PM
  #118  
mmarshall's Avatar
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 94,475
Likes: 252
From: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Default

Originally Posted by SW17LS
I drove BOF SUVs for a long time, I don't want one again. Give me a unibody crossover any day,
Got tired of bouncing around with that kidney-pounding ride?

Some BOF SUVs, today, though, are quite comfortable...particularly the long-wheelbase Expedition, but you obviously won't buy one for chump-change.

My next-door neighbor came home, a few days ago, with a new regular-wheelbase Expedition Limited....but I have another thread going on that.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2019 | 06:51 AM
  #119  
tex2670's Avatar
tex2670
Lexus Champion
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Liked
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 11,056
Likes: 103
From: Southeastern PA
Default

Originally Posted by SW17LS
I'm not sure where the reverence for the Blazer name comes from. I've always found the S10/smaller Blazer to be a crappy vehicle when compared to similar Explorers, 4Runners, etc.
As was part of the discussion earlier in the thread, I would see the Blazer name more intended to refer to the original Blazer from the 70s and 80s, which competed with the Bronco. Maybe it's just an age thing; the name "Blazer" to me, without this discussion, never made me think S10 Blazer.

Last edited by tex2670; Feb 25, 2019 at 11:55 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2019 | 10:17 AM
  #120  
FrankReynoldsCPA's Avatar
FrankReynoldsCPA
Lexus Test Driver
15 Year Member
Community Influencer
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 8,396
Likes: 361
From: Las Vegas
Default

Originally Posted by SW17LS
And? So? The Explorer was a truck based product and now is a unibody crossover. The Pathfinder was a truck based product and now is a unibody crossover. Both the Explorer and the Pathfinder had/have strong followers of fans that don't like their new models.

A Blazer off the Colorado/Canyon platform wouldn't be the sort of vehicle buyers today want. I drove BOF SUVs for a long time, I don't want one again. Give me a unibody crossover any day, I can go more "off-roadey" with a Grand Cherokee, I can go more "on-Roady" with an Explorer, all while having a vehicle with much better space efficiency and driving comfort than I would with a BOF design.

Modern SUV buyers want crossovers by and large. Can't blame GM for building what buyers buy.
Just because you don't like body on frame SUV's for city driving doesn't mean that they don't have a place. They are far superior to CUV's when it comes to off-roading.

Ford bringing the Bronco back as a body on frame SUV is an answer to a loud call for it.

Resurrecting a nameplate and using it for an entirely different kind of vehicle is pandering. It's the automaker trying to appeal to the nostalgia of the old vehicle without delivering what actually made that vehicle a fan favorite. The Dodge Charger, the Chevy Blazer, the Mitsubishi Eclipse(now a CUV), the 2011+ Ford Explorer, etc. They are all examples of this. Imagine if Toyota said "We're bringing back the MR2" and it ends up being a 4 door midsize sedan.

The excitement for the Blazer name mostly dates back to the older K-10 blazer, which was based on the 1500 truck platform. It was a 2 door, short wheelbase monster that was well loved in the off-road community. GM later replaced it with the S-10 blazer(my parents owned the GMC Jimmy version of this).

Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:14 PM.