2019 Chevy Blazer
GM’s Mexico-made Chevy Blazer becomes a political pariah for auto workers
When General Motors Co. brought back the Chevrolet Blazer last year, the revival conjured up images of the rugged 4x4 SUV from decades past. But GM workers were nostalgic for a different reason: The old full-size model was last built in a now-shuttered plant in Janesville, Wis.
Much to the chagrin of the United Auto Workers union, GM decided to build the revitalized Blazer at a plant in Ramos Arizpe, Mexico, a move announced five months before the company put four U.S. factories on notice that they’re at risk of being closed. Ever since then, the union has treated the vehicle as a pariah and symbol of long-festering grudges against the automaker’s off-shoring strategy.
To the union, “the Blazer is emblematic of everything that is wrong with the world,” said Kristin Dziczek, vice president of industry, labor and economics at the Center for Automotive Research in Ann Arbor, Mich.
Although the Blazer has so far avoided the wrath of President Trump and his Democratic challengers for the White House, the same can’t be said of GM’s layoffs of American workers. The dismissals have become a lightning rod for politicians of all stripes and earned the company an unfortunate call-out during the first night of debates in the company’s hometown.
When asked about GM’s job cuts during the debate Tuesday, South Bend, Ind., Mayor Pete Buttigieg said that government needs to take a role in retraining workers who lose their jobs. “It’s why we actually need to put the interests of workers first,” he said. “Of course we need to do retraining. But this is so much bigger than a trade fight. This is about a moment when the economy is changing before our eyes.”
GM’s labor relations may remain a focal point on Wednesday when the remaining major candidates for the Democratic presidential nomination face off for the second night of debate in Detroit, across town from GM’s headquarters. Michigan and neighboring Wisconsin are both key swing states that traditionally vote for Democrats in presidential elections, but opted for Trump in 2016.
The decision to build the Blazer in Mexico and the preparation work to assemble it started several years ago, when GM’s Lordstown, Ohio, factory was cranking out Chevy Cruze compact cars during three shifts, said Jim Cain, a spokesman for the automaker. Sales then slumped, and the company ceased production earlier this year.
GM had manufacturing space for the Blazer in Ramos Arizpe because the company moved a Cadillac SUV from that plant to another in Tennessee, said Cain, who notes the Chevy SUV uses $500 million a year in U.S. parts.
The Blazer and the fate of unionized workers also are contentious issues in negotiations this summer between GM and the UAW for a new four-year labor agreement. The talks were preceded by a kerfuffle over the Blazer this spring.
In March, GM hoisted a Blazer atop General Motors Fountain beyond the center-field wall at Comerica Park, home of the Detroit Tigers baseball team. When union workers found out, they attacked it as a snub to the city, raging about what they considered to be a brazen indignity on Detroit talk-radio stations and social media.
The automaker took down the Blazer before opening day and replaced it with a Chevy Traverse, which is built in Lansing, Mich. “Did GM not know this would be a stick in the eye to workers who go to the games?” Dziczek asked rhetorically.
The union hasn’t let GM forget that apparent slight. Dan Morgan, chairman of UAW Local 1112 in Lordstown, Ohio, which faces closure, tweeted Tuesday that the Blazer is “over-priced Mexican junk! That’s why it’s not above the Tigers stadium.”
The new SUV has become a focus of anger for workers who risk losing their job if they refuse relocation to another GM plant. Regina Duley is one of about 100 workers remaining at a GM transmission plant in Warren, Mich., who face their last week at work before their factory is idled.
“I would not buy that product,” Duley, a 21-year plant veteran, said of the Blazer during a press conference at the Local 909 union hall across the street from the Warren plant. “How could I buy that when they build it in Mexico and we have people without jobs here?”
Much to the chagrin of the United Auto Workers union, GM decided to build the revitalized Blazer at a plant in Ramos Arizpe, Mexico, a move announced five months before the company put four U.S. factories on notice that they’re at risk of being closed. Ever since then, the union has treated the vehicle as a pariah and symbol of long-festering grudges against the automaker’s off-shoring strategy.
To the union, “the Blazer is emblematic of everything that is wrong with the world,” said Kristin Dziczek, vice president of industry, labor and economics at the Center for Automotive Research in Ann Arbor, Mich.
Although the Blazer has so far avoided the wrath of President Trump and his Democratic challengers for the White House, the same can’t be said of GM’s layoffs of American workers. The dismissals have become a lightning rod for politicians of all stripes and earned the company an unfortunate call-out during the first night of debates in the company’s hometown.
When asked about GM’s job cuts during the debate Tuesday, South Bend, Ind., Mayor Pete Buttigieg said that government needs to take a role in retraining workers who lose their jobs. “It’s why we actually need to put the interests of workers first,” he said. “Of course we need to do retraining. But this is so much bigger than a trade fight. This is about a moment when the economy is changing before our eyes.”
GM’s labor relations may remain a focal point on Wednesday when the remaining major candidates for the Democratic presidential nomination face off for the second night of debate in Detroit, across town from GM’s headquarters. Michigan and neighboring Wisconsin are both key swing states that traditionally vote for Democrats in presidential elections, but opted for Trump in 2016.
The decision to build the Blazer in Mexico and the preparation work to assemble it started several years ago, when GM’s Lordstown, Ohio, factory was cranking out Chevy Cruze compact cars during three shifts, said Jim Cain, a spokesman for the automaker. Sales then slumped, and the company ceased production earlier this year.
GM had manufacturing space for the Blazer in Ramos Arizpe because the company moved a Cadillac SUV from that plant to another in Tennessee, said Cain, who notes the Chevy SUV uses $500 million a year in U.S. parts.
The Blazer and the fate of unionized workers also are contentious issues in negotiations this summer between GM and the UAW for a new four-year labor agreement. The talks were preceded by a kerfuffle over the Blazer this spring.
In March, GM hoisted a Blazer atop General Motors Fountain beyond the center-field wall at Comerica Park, home of the Detroit Tigers baseball team. When union workers found out, they attacked it as a snub to the city, raging about what they considered to be a brazen indignity on Detroit talk-radio stations and social media.
The automaker took down the Blazer before opening day and replaced it with a Chevy Traverse, which is built in Lansing, Mich. “Did GM not know this would be a stick in the eye to workers who go to the games?” Dziczek asked rhetorically.
The union hasn’t let GM forget that apparent slight. Dan Morgan, chairman of UAW Local 1112 in Lordstown, Ohio, which faces closure, tweeted Tuesday that the Blazer is “over-priced Mexican junk! That’s why it’s not above the Tigers stadium.”
The new SUV has become a focus of anger for workers who risk losing their job if they refuse relocation to another GM plant. Regina Duley is one of about 100 workers remaining at a GM transmission plant in Warren, Mich., who face their last week at work before their factory is idled.
“I would not buy that product,” Duley, a 21-year plant veteran, said of the Blazer during a press conference at the Local 909 union hall across the street from the Warren plant. “How could I buy that when they build it in Mexico and we have people without jobs here?”
“I would not buy that product,” Duley, a 21-year plant veteran, said of the Blazer during a press conference at the Local 909 union hall across the street from the Warren plant. “How could I buy that when they build it in Mexico and we have people without jobs here?”
IMO there are many reasons not to buy or lease it. Mexican production is only one of them.
In March, GM hoisted a Blazer atop General Motors Fountain beyond the center-field wall at Comerica Park, home of the Detroit Tigers baseball team. When union workers found out, they attacked it as a snub to the city, raging about what they considered to be a brazen indignity on Detroit talk-radio stations and social media.
The automaker took down the Blazer before opening day and replaced it with a Chevy Traverse, which is built in Lansing, Mich. “Did GM not know this would be a stick in the eye to workers who go to the games?” Dziczek asked rhetorically.
The automaker took down the Blazer before opening day and replaced it with a Chevy Traverse, which is built in Lansing, Mich. “Did GM not know this would be a stick in the eye to workers who go to the games?” Dziczek asked rhetorically.
“the Blazer is emblematic of everything that is wrong with the world,” said Kristin Dziczek, vice president of industry, labor and economics at the Center for Automotive Research in Ann Arbor, Mich.
If GM thinks they are getting flak for this POS Blazer now, just wait till the Ford Bronco, which will be a real Bronco, debuts next year. Not only will it have been properly designed in the first place (with body-on-frame construction), but it will be built (as the Blazer should also have been) in the Wayne, MI Plant, with American UAW labor. Time will tell, but I think I see the beginnings of another potential Pontiac Aztek at GM.
Last edited by mmarshall; Aug 5, 2019 at 05:01 PM.
Have you seen one? Its not a POS at all its actually a very nice vehicle, good quality inside and out. You just don't like it because they make it in Mexico. The public doesnt care where its made.
Given a choice between a BOF Bronco and a unibody Blazer, I would take the Blazer. I dont want or need a BOF vehicle. If my UAW American made cars are any example, I'd rather they be built in Mexico unfortunately.
Given a choice between a BOF Bronco and a unibody Blazer, I would take the Blazer. I dont want or need a BOF vehicle. If my UAW American made cars are any example, I'd rather they be built in Mexico unfortunately.
My opinion of it also goes beyond its Mexican Plant....though I am of the firm belief that American companies should (first) support American workers. Nevertheless, in my family, we have purchased Mexican-built vehicles before. My late mother, for example, had a Mercury Tracer built in Hermosillo, Mexico. We bought it primarily because of my good experience (a the time) with the Mazda 323/Protege, and the Tracer was a redone 323 with some differences in the trim and the transmission.
If my UAW American made cars are any example, I'd rather they be built in Mexico unfortunately.
Last edited by mmarshall; Aug 5, 2019 at 05:16 PM.
I think you're letting your personal opinion on this matter color your perception of the Blazer. If it was built in the US I bet your outlook on it would be quite different. They sold nearly 12,000 of them in Q2, so people are buying them.
I had two UAW assembled Jeep Grand Cherokees.
I had two UAW assembled Jeep Grand Cherokees.
At one time, I supported more free-trade across our boundaries. Back in the 1990s, it worked for the common good, and opened up new markets. But, since then, the mass exodus of American jobs has caused serious damage to the American economy....which we have only started recovering from in the last few years. Even worse, much of what we need strategically and economically is now located overseas....Boeing, fortunately, is one of those rare exceptions.
I had two UAW assembled Jeep Grand Cherokees.
I'm not sure where your Buick was built, but I know your old Lexus IS wasn't built in the US. What about your Subie? Why do you hold the Blazer to a different standard than you apply to your own vehicles?
Hamtramck (Detroit), Michigan.
I don't remember where it was built....other than a Japanese plant. Probably the same plant, though, as the Toyota Altezza, as the 1Gen IS was a converted left-hand-drive Altezza.
Lafayette Indiana....in what was formerly a joint Subaru/Isuzu plant, but is now Toyota/Subaru.
First, I don't necessarily hold it to a different standard. I have not purchased a vehicle built outside North America for almost 20 years. (My Verano, a converted Opel Astra, was also built in Michigan). Second, my view of the Blazer is not based simply where it is built ( though that's part of it)...but also the fact that I don't consider it a suitable replacement for Blazer fans (my view is not alone, but also shared by much of the auto press). I will not make an out-and-out prediction, but will not be surprised if the upcoming Ford Bronco gets a far better reception. Third, every auto company occasionally makes mistakes....and GM is certainly no exception. Fourth (and, perhaps, this is most important), today's auto industry is simply not the same as it was 20 or 20 years ago....apples and oranges. Far more American auto-worker jobs have been lost, Chrysler (one of the Big 3) is actually foreign-owned, GM and Ford are both but a shadow of their former selves, American plants are shutting down left and right, and it is simply time to say enough is enough.
but I know your old Lexus IS wasn't built in the US.
What about your Subie?
Why do you hold the Blazer to a different standard than you apply to your own vehicles?
Last edited by mmarshall; Aug 6, 2019 at 07:06 AM.
So right or wrong, everyone has a different feel for this issue. Some people hold the Blazer to a different standard because it is an American company building the car in Mexico while they close plants inside the United States. It is the cheap labor that GM is going for while putting out workers who are working class. I don’t feel is particularly OK. I also don’t feel it’s ok for Toyota to build 150K Tacoma’s in Mexico either.
Last edited by Toys4RJill; Aug 6, 2019 at 07:11 AM.
But this is nothing new. Lee Iaccoca pounded the "Buy American" drum when tons of Chrysler Corp cars were built in Canada, or were re-badged Mitsubishis. That was in the 1980s, way before NAFTA.
I don't have a problem at all with "Buy American", as long as anyone preaching it, also practices it.
And I'll save for another thread "What is an 'American' car?" since so many foreign makers have plants in the US. It the headquarters of the company? Is it where the car is built? Is it the % of American parts?
So right or wrong, everyone has a different feel for this issues. People hold the Blazer to a different standard because it is an American company building the car in Mexico while they close plants inside the United States. It is the cheap labor that GM is going for while putting out workers who are working class. I don’t feel is particularly OK. I also don’t feel it’s ok for Toyota to build 150K Tacoma’s in Mexico either.
I believe it’s wrong, that is my opinion. I also think buy an American made car is very different than buy a car with cheap labor.













