adaptive cruise control experience
1. engaged cruise with stalk and pulled down to 'set' speed.
2. realized it was a bit slow, so i held stalk up to accelerate (increase cruise set speed), and the car very slowly increased speed.
3. pressed adaptive cruise button indicating how many car lengths between my test car and one in front. ok, it's working.
4. changed from 3 car lengths to 2, and my test car sped up a bit to catch up with (get closer to) car in front. cool.
5. car in front decided at last second to brake and exit interstate (i was in right lane behind him, but i wasn't getting off).
6. i tapped the brake lightly (instinctively, because i wasn't sure adaptive cruise would react 'enough'), which of course disengaged the cruise.
7. now, open highway in front, i push stalk up to 'RESume' speed, and the car took off fast, 70, 75, 80, 85!!! i felt like i was in one of those 'unintended acceleration' scenarios.
8. not knowing if the car would ever slow down, i pressed the brake pedal which disengaged the cruise and slowed the car down.
now this is what i think happened.
engaging cruise in step 1 turned on the adaptive cruise automatically (as far as i can tell there was no 'off').
in step 2, when i thought i was making the car go faster, i wasn't because it was held back by the adaptive cruise keeping distance with the car in front, but it WAS increasing the cruise 'set' speed anyway, a lot, unbeknownst to me.
in step 7, i did the cruise resume which then resumed to a much higher set speed than i had intended. with no indication of what the cruise set speed was (if no cars were holding it back), i had no way of knowing what speed the cruise wanted to go.
so i don't know if i have that right, but it seemed somewhat dangerous to the uninitiated. it seems to me the resume cruise should not go faster than the highest speed it had been going when being held back by distance previously.
anyone got a better explanation or understanding?
Generally almost all the cars I've evaluated noted the "set" speed fairly prominently within the gauge cluster and/or heads up display.
Should also be noted that some adaptive cruise control system will bring the car to a complete halt, while others may only initiate braking, but require the driver to intervene and bring the car to a full halt if needed.
well well, this seems to capture the matter...
Introduced in the ’04 Lexus LS 430 and now available on all Lexus models except the SC convertible, the DRCC uses front-mounted radar sensors to detect a vehicle traveling ahead and paces the trailing car’s speed accordingly.
When the lead vehicle slows down, the trailing vehicle slows down. When the lead vehicle speeds up, the trailing vehicle speeds up.
Drivers using that mode can choose between long, medium and short trailing distances, selected by a steering-wheel-mounted button.
Priuses equipped with DRCC also have a conventional cruise-control mode. However, vehicle-to-vehicle with a long-distance setting is the default mode when a driver activates cruise control in the ’10 Prius.
In vehicle-to-vehicle mode, speeds are set either by modulating the gas pedal and tapping down on the stalk at the desired moment, or by manipulating the stalk up or down then releasing.
Tapping the stalk upward boosts speed in 1-mph (0.6-km/h) increments. But if the stalk is moved up and held, speed increases at 5-mph (8-km/h) increments, a fact not detailed in the DRCC section of the ’10 Prius’ owner’s manual.
“That’s where people are getting confused, I think,” Toyota spokesman Dave Lee tells Ward’s. Lee says the rate at which drivers can reach a desired speed using the stalk is much faster than if they accelerated via the gas pedal, taking about one second to advance every 5-mph increment.
“If you’re going 60 (97 km/h) and want to accelerate to 80 (129 km/h), holding that stalk for about four seconds will get it done,” Lee says. “Trying to do it the traditional way in (vehicle-to-vehicle) radar cruise, it will take a lot longer than four seconds to get to 80.”
it apparently also confused steve wozniak, co-founder of apple.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/US/02/11/prius.cruise.control/
Trending Topics
however, i've even gone and looked at the online manual to see if it's there and finally found it.http://www.toyota.com/t3Portal/docum.../sec_02-04.pdf
p.233
the 'over to the right' center guage stack is bad enough, but the set speed indicator is on the right of that, so basically in front of the passenger seat. this is a TERRIBLE design.
Celebrating Lexus & Toyota from Around the Globe
But yes, there is a learning curve to newer functions. I now use them quite frequently. Love the ones that can bring the car to a full stop, it's the only way to navigate L.A. stop and go traffic!
Hoovey, I agree about PCS. First time was because of an idiot crossing three lanes for an exit at the last possible second. I jumped on the brakes, PCS took over. Scared the bejesus outta me!
now this is what i think happened.
engaging cruise in step 1 turned on the adaptive cruise automatically (as far as i can tell there was no 'off').
in step 2, when i thought i was making the car go faster, i wasn't because it was held back by the adaptive cruise keeping distance with the car in front, but it WAS increasing the cruise 'set' speed anyway, a lot, unbeknownst to me.
in step 7, i did the cruise resume which then resumed to a much higher set speed than i had intended. with no indication of what the cruise set speed was (if no cars were holding it back), i had no way of knowing what speed the cruise wanted to go.
anyone got a better explanation or understanding?

You also must have been driving a car with at least a fairly high power to weight ratio, because the computer, no matter what the electronics in it, obviously can't make the car accelerate any faster than the engine or drivetrain gearing is capable of.
You also must have been driving a car with at least a fairly high power to weight ratio, because the computer, no matter what the electronics in it, obviously can't make the car accelerate any faster than the engine or drivetrain gearing is capable of.














