Notices
Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Innova

Audi Q5?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 6, 2009 | 03:46 AM
  #1  
Rash's Avatar
Rash
Thread Starter
hmm
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 12,126
Likes: 3
From: dxb
Default Audi Q5?

I love this car, but I don't know anything about it. My cousin is thinking of getting one, I want to see some cool options/mods/colors/pictures ..etc.

Let me know please.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2009 | 06:49 AM
  #2  
The G Man's Avatar
The G Man
Lexus Test Driver
20 Year Member
Photogenic
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,787
Likes: 122
From: MA
Default

There are picture of the Q5 all over the internet, shouldnt be hard to find. The coolest option or non-option is the standard panarama sunroof. there is also the optional Audi select a drive system which is pretty cool, you can push a button and change the suspension stiffness, transmsion shift map, throttle toe in map, steering stiffness and steering response ratio.
As far as mods are concerned, this SUV is too new, very few mods on the market for it yet. Overall, a great handling SUV, nice styling inside and outside, the ride is somewhat comfortable. The biggest draw back is cargo room, if your cousin need a lot of cargo room, he needs to look at something like the RX.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2009 | 07:12 AM
  #3  
rdgdawg's Avatar
rdgdawg
Pole Position
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,794
Likes: 0
From: Lake Country, WI
Default

Attractive, pricey, quick, handles well for an SUV, 1st year so beware... not staying on dealer lots long. Lots of tech....
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2009 | 07:24 AM
  #4  
The G Man's Avatar
The G Man
Lexus Test Driver
20 Year Member
Photogenic
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,787
Likes: 122
From: MA
Default

Originally Posted by rdgdawg
Attractive, pricey, quick, handles well for an SUV, 1st year so beware... not staying on dealer lots long. Lots of tech....
About the same price as a RX, as far as I know, there is no wide spread problem with the new Q5. It is into its 2nd year of production already, in Europe, its been around longer than US. Audi dumb down the US version to make it more reliable, such as using the 3.2L engine thats been around for a while and using a conventional tranny instead of using the S tronic dual-clutch transmission which shifts much quicker but its a lot more complicated.
Last time I heard, Audi is running the Q5 line in Germany 24 hours a day to try to meet demand, but the stock in our local Audi dealer is still very thin.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2009 | 08:37 AM
  #5  
rominl's Avatar
rominl
exclusive matchup
20 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 81,772
Likes: 349
From: Lovely OC
Default

the drive train, while solid, is my biggest problem since it's sort of dated, otherwise i think the car is pretty solid. i am a bit bummed by the exterior, i don't think it looks as good as the q7, but if i have to get a suv now, q7 and q5 will be high up on the list
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2009 | 08:43 AM
  #6  
The G Man's Avatar
The G Man
Lexus Test Driver
20 Year Member
Photogenic
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,787
Likes: 122
From: MA
Default

Originally Posted by rominl
the drive train, while solid, is my biggest problem since it's sort of dated, otherwise i think the car is pretty solid. i am a bit bummed by the exterior, i don't think it looks as good as the q7, but if i have to get a suv now, q7 and q5 will be high up on the list
You would think a dated German drivetrain would be prefered since all the bugs have been worked out, sad but true

The Q7 is very poorly design in my opinion. Much bigger than the Q5 from the outside and passenger room was almost the same. The Q7 had a bit more cargo space. We look at both SUV and wonder where all the space went in the Q7. If we were in the market for a full size SUV, the Q7 would have been pretty low on our list.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2009 | 08:48 AM
  #7  
rominl's Avatar
rominl
exclusive matchup
20 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 81,772
Likes: 349
From: Lovely OC
Default

Originally Posted by The G Man
You would think a dated German drivetrain would be prefered since all the bugs have been worked out, sad but true

The Q7 is very poorly design in my opinion. Much bigger than the Q5 from the outside and passenger room was almost the same. The Q7 had a bit more cargo space. We look at both SUV and wonder where all the space went in the Q7. If we were in the market for a full size SUV, the Q7 would have been pretty low on our list.
i have to agree with you, proven drivetrain is definitely a good idea on euro cars. but on the other hand just feel it's a bit bummer you are paying that much for something old (weird feeling)

i have to look at the q5 in more details. before it came out the q7 was high up on our list for suv, we'd choose that over any other suv in the market. q5 i haven't looked closely in person, but i guess it doesn't have the same presence as the q7 which put me down a bit. i would love to see the interior room and setup on the q5
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2009 | 09:02 AM
  #8  
The G Man's Avatar
The G Man
Lexus Test Driver
20 Year Member
Photogenic
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,787
Likes: 122
From: MA
Default

Q7:

Length: 200.3 in. Width: 78.1 in.
Height: 68.4 in. Wheel Base: 118.2 in.
Ground Clearance: 8.1 in. Curb Weight: 5423 lbs.
Interior
Front Head Room: 40 in. Front Shoulder Room: 58.7 in.
Rear Head Room: 37.2 in. Rear Shoulder Room: 58.1 in.
Front Leg Room: 41.3 in. Rear Leg Room: 37.1 in.
Luggage Capacity: 10.9 cu. ft. Maximum Cargo Capacity: 73 cu. ft.

Q5:

Length: 182.2 in. Width: 74 in.
Height: 65.1 in. Wheel Base: 110.5 in.
Ground Clearance: 7.9 in. Curb Weight: 4178 lbs.
Gross Weight: 5456 lbs.
Interior
Front Head Room: 41.1 in. Front Shoulder Room: 57.7 in.
Rear Head Room: 39 in. Rear Shoulder Room: 56.4 in.
Front Leg Room: 41 in. Rear Leg Room: 37.4 in.
Luggage Capacity: 29.1 cu. ft. Maximum Cargo Capacity: 57 cu. ft.

As you can see, the Q7 is more than a foot and half longer and more than 4 inches wider, which is really bothersome because the Q5 is pretty wide as it is, but the interior passenger room is about the same, the Q5 actually have more headroom. For all that extra length, the Q7 should have more than that 14 cubic feet of cargo space. Like I said, where did all the space go?

Last edited by The G Man; Nov 6, 2009 at 09:07 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2009 | 09:16 AM
  #9  
spwolf's Avatar
spwolf
Lexus Fanatic
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 20,211
Likes: 260
Default

Originally Posted by The G Man
You would think a dated German drivetrain would be prefered since all the bugs have been worked out, sad but true

The Q7 is very poorly design in my opinion. Much bigger than the Q5 from the outside and passenger room was almost the same. The Q7 had a bit more cargo space. We look at both SUV and wonder where all the space went in the Q7. If we were in the market for a full size SUV, the Q7 would have been pretty low on our list.
Plenty of problems if you look:
http://www.go-audi.com/audi-q5-forum/

For better or worse, "proven" powertrain in new car is never proven. Every powertrain implementation is different from car to car, even if it is the "same" engine.

That being said, Q5 looks awesome, and if you dont need much space at the back, it definetly looks like sweet buy.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2009 | 09:41 AM
  #10  
rdgdawg's Avatar
rdgdawg
Pole Position
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,794
Likes: 0
From: Lake Country, WI
Default

Another thought: consider Infiniti EX35? IMO opinion, no contest, much more all the way around for less $$.

Sales are down 42% this year on EXs so HUGE discounts right now...
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2009 | 10:54 AM
  #11  
Rash's Avatar
Rash
Thread Starter
hmm
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 12,126
Likes: 3
From: dxb
Default

Thank you guys for the comments.
spwolf, holy ****, the forum topics are just scary to read!!

I have to point out:

- My cousin is a she
- She doesn't care much about cargo room, she just wants a small SUV
- She doesn't like Japanese cars, trust me I tried
- I don't think she wants any other car.

Is the 2010 out yet? or too soon?
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2009 | 11:46 AM
  #12  
(Cj)'s Avatar
(Cj)
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,227
Likes: 0
From: somewhere out there
Default

Originally Posted by Rashoodz
Thank you guys for the comments.
spwolf, holy ****, the forum topics are just scary to read!!

I have to point out:

- My cousin is a she
- She doesn't care much about cargo room, she just wants a small SUV
- She doesn't like Japanese cars, trust me I tried
- I don't think she wants any other car.

Is the 2010 out yet? or too soon?
If she doesn't like Japanese cars maybe she should check out the Mercedes GLK. That did pretty good on Consumer Reports latest survey. Or maybe the Cadillac SRX?
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2009 | 12:04 PM
  #13  
The G Man's Avatar
The G Man
Lexus Test Driver
20 Year Member
Photogenic
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,787
Likes: 122
From: MA
Default

Originally Posted by Rashoodz
Thank you guys for the comments.
spwolf, holy ****, the forum topics are just scary to read!!

I have to point out:

- My cousin is a she
- She doesn't care much about cargo room, she just wants a small SUV
- She doesn't like Japanese cars, trust me I tried
- I don't think she wants any other car.

Is the 2010 out yet? or too soon?
The 2010 Q5 have been out since August, it was a early model year change.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2009 | 12:42 PM
  #14  
IS-SV's Avatar
IS-SV
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,100
Likes: 1
From: tech capital
Default

Originally Posted by (Cj)
If she doesn't like Japanese cars maybe she should check out the Mercedes GLK. That did pretty good on Consumer Reports latest survey. Or maybe the Cadillac SRX?
I agreed, at least with a recommendation of the GLK.

Since it's derived from current C-class, reliability should be acceptable.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2009 | 12:56 PM
  #15  
rominl's Avatar
rominl
exclusive matchup
20 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 81,772
Likes: 349
From: Lovely OC
Default

Originally Posted by The G Man
Q7:

Length: 200.3 in. Width: 78.1 in.
Height: 68.4 in. Wheel Base: 118.2 in.
Ground Clearance: 8.1 in. Curb Weight: 5423 lbs.
Interior
Front Head Room: 40 in. Front Shoulder Room: 58.7 in.
Rear Head Room: 37.2 in. Rear Shoulder Room: 58.1 in.
Front Leg Room: 41.3 in. Rear Leg Room: 37.1 in.
Luggage Capacity: 10.9 cu. ft. Maximum Cargo Capacity: 73 cu. ft.

Q5:

Length: 182.2 in. Width: 74 in.
Height: 65.1 in. Wheel Base: 110.5 in.
Ground Clearance: 7.9 in. Curb Weight: 4178 lbs.
Gross Weight: 5456 lbs.
Interior
Front Head Room: 41.1 in. Front Shoulder Room: 57.7 in.
Rear Head Room: 39 in. Rear Shoulder Room: 56.4 in.
Front Leg Room: 41 in. Rear Leg Room: 37.4 in.
Luggage Capacity: 29.1 cu. ft. Maximum Cargo Capacity: 57 cu. ft.

As you can see, the Q7 is more than a foot and half longer and more than 4 inches wider, which is really bothersome because the Q5 is pretty wide as it is, but the interior passenger room is about the same, the Q5 actually have more headroom. For all that extra length, the Q7 should have more than that 14 cubic feet of cargo space. Like I said, where did all the space go?
wow, those are indeed some very interesting numbers. i guess i need to make another trip to audi!
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:13 AM.