Probably posted...I'm such a snail...

Driver's Republic Ring test.
http://magazines.drivers-republic.co...c/thetruth030/

Some vids within the article.

 

The only truth here is that GT2 is just a bit faster than GT-R and costs almost four times more

 

I definitely enjoyed reading the entire article, thanks for posting the link.

 

Quote from the article ,
Good read, thanks posting.


Almost, and Four times as much hey...

 

lol awesome.

if I had the money, I'd choose the GT2.

but if money was the issue, I'd be stuck between a Turbo and the GT-R.

as it stands now?

I can afford die cast models of both

 

GT2 for me too if $$$ no issue.

I haven't seen a die cast model of the GT-R yet at our local stores , I'm not sure I'd get one though sinceb I'm not a fan of it's design ... depending on the workmanship & the colors available I guess ...

 

The Nissan puts in a good game so folks at a different price point can play now. For me as well, the Porsche as a performance status car is unquestionable. I doubt I'd desire a GT-2 for daily driving where the GT-R would have no quibbles. $$ no object, I'd take the GT-R in my current mind frame, then use the extra $$ other ways.

 

If I couldnt afford the GT2 but afford the GTR, I'd either get a Supra (and mod the hell out of it) or a ZR-1.

 

Finally....

As pointed out in the thread about the ring, there are just so many factors that apply to a lap time, that a given lap time there means almost nothing. The fact here (at least in this test) is that the GT2 is a faster car than the GT-R and yes, it should be due to its price.