Which car would you get? Higher-end imports?
I probably will lease the next car for 3 years because I am tired of getting caught upside down loan-wise on these cars depreciating so much. I would rather turn it in at the end and be done.
I thought about getting the SL55 but again.....the redesign pretty much removes that as an option.
I like the new S550....however, it would be hard going to a big sedan from a small car. I doubt the 550 is that fun to drive. Plus, I am not paying $1500/month for a car that will be a dime a dozen in a year or two. Hell, they already are.
Same with the new CL......not paying $100k or $2k month for a normal 550 when they will be $65k in 2 years.
Jags....never had one, don't really trust them. Maybe MMarshall can weigh in on the reliability of the new XK.
Lexus....sadly nothing I want. I think they screwed up on the new LS and of course there is no successor to the SC430 now.
That brings me to BMW. I like the 6 series....they won't redesign until 2011 or 2012 so I am good in a 3 year lease. I have heard some M6's are going for $1k month lease. If I can get a 650i for $750/mo....I would surely pay $1k for a M6 because even with that, I am saving $250 per month for what I spend on the SL per month. It is a rare car...M6.....fast.....nice looking. However, not a big fan of the ragtop for the convertible.
Final option is the CLS55/CLS63. Pretty nice car....sedanish......
I think my top 2 options at this point are the M6 and CLS55/63 with the 650i right behind. Thoughts?
Last edited by mjr24; Feb 27, 2008 at 07:25 PM.
On a lease, though, reliability is generally less of of a factor then on a purchase, especially if you keep the car past the warranty period. That, of course, usually doesn't happen with a lease...the typical lease term is 2-4 years. So, any problems you do have would be warranty-covered......and it's just the inconvienence of taking the car to the dealer and getting a loner (if needed).
If you like the XK8 (and, yes, it is a beautiful car), go for it.....though I agree with Och that an Audi would probably be a better choice, especially a Quattro AWD one, since you are in Chicago and can get some pretty bad winters and road conditions. Audi reliability, overall, is not particularly good, particularly in electronics, but generally a step above Jaguar's. And the Audi DSG (Direct-Shift-gearbox) is a marvelous transmission...try one out and I think you will agree.
BMWs have superb steering and chassis dynamics, but they share the Audi's propensity for weak electronics, and like Audi's MMI, have a similiar awkward device with the I-Drive. I also am not impressed with BMW fit/finish and interiors.
Last edited by mmarshall; Feb 27, 2008 at 07:44 PM.
The new S5 is nice.....but I think the M6, CLS AMG, etc. are on a different level.
This might be a stupid reason but honestly there are no good message boards out for Jaguar. It would be the same with Bentley, Ferrari, etc. This is relevant because if something broke....my only opinion and option is the dealer.
It's not like BMW, Lexus, Mercedes, etc......where almost any problem you will have with any model someone on this forum....or the BMW one, etc. will already have experienced and had fixed.
But, like I said in the last post, it is a beautiful car. If you like it, and plan to lease one for only 2 or 3 years, it's worth considering....any warranty problems, of course, will be on Jag, not you.
Also, keep in mind that the XK, despite its stunning looks, is not a true sports car per se.....though it can give an account of itelf on twisty roads, it was primarily designed as a luxury/sport coupe or a GT/Touring car, not a hard-edged track car. You're not going to get especially quick lap times with it around the Nurburgring....it wasn't designed for that. The supercharged XKR version, with 400 HP, is, again, not the fastest car in its class, but will obviously get out of its own way.
In your poll I voted for the Jag, they are cool and rare. I guess the M6 is also rare, but not too many people know the difference between M6 and a regular 645, so it wont be as exclusive as the jag.
Last edited by Och; Feb 27, 2008 at 08:03 PM.
Trending Topics
Last edited by mmarshall; Feb 27, 2008 at 08:13 PM.
Celebrating Lexus & Toyota from Around the Globe
The new S5 is nice.....but I think the M6, CLS AMG, etc. are on a different level.
Quote:
Jaguar didn't exactly write the book on reliablity. They were awful up until the early-mid 90's when they first came under Ford ownership, then had a few OK years, but then slipped again......and have been below average ever since.
So you would not recommend the new XK? Have you heard anything specific to those models problem-wise?
This might be a stupid reason but honestly there are no good message boards out for Jaguar. It would be the same with Bentley, Ferrari, etc. This is relevant because if something broke....my only opinion and option is the dealer.
It's not like BMW, Lexus, Mercedes, etc......where almost any problem you will have with any model someone on this forum....or the BMW one, etc. will already have experienced and had fixed.
You might know what all the problems are but knowing you may most likely experience those problems in the near future with a +$80k car and have to go through the hassle of dealing with it might sway you away from the Benz.
If Jaguar's reliability is an issue, so is Benz's. Great cars with tons of issues.
Of the cars you listed, I'd say go with the M6.
[edit]
I see you own a Benz so you're probably more familiar with the car and company than myself.
M6 still gets my vote.
1) aston V8 Vantage
2) Jaguar XF (the new one that looks like the GS)
3) CLS 63
4) Bentley Cont.
5) Maserati Quad.
6) S63
7) C63
wow, thats quite an expensive list
That being said, there are really attractive lease rates on the M6 right now. Styling is subjective, but I don't like the 6 series convertible...the rag-top cheapens the look of the car. The coupe is much better looking IMHO.





























