CL Community Team
bitkahuna
CL Community Team
close
- Join DateFeb 2001
- Posts:80,776
-
iTrader Positive Feedback100
-
iTrader Feedback Score(20)
-
Likes:2,273
-
Liked:3,985 Times in 2,706 Posts
I'd throw up if I wasn't gagging so bad....

Quote:
Well, yes and no. I agree that the radio, climate-control buttons, and mid-dash are awful and make me want to throw up too. But the dual gauges behind the wheel and the smaller ones on the forward part of the console are much better.....they are like the original Camaros from the mid-late late 60's. That is one of the cars I grew up with in high school....I remember it well.Originally Posted by bitkahuna
I'd throw up if I wasn't gagging so bad....
Lexus Test Driver
That looks like crap! That middle pod along with those honkin HVAC vents...yikes!
The shifter looks especially generic. I don't know why the American cars don't use gated automatics - they look so much better.
The shifter looks especially generic. I don't know why the American cars don't use gated automatics - they look so much better.Quote:
Originally Posted by MadMax96
I don't know why the American cars don't use gated automatics - they look so much better.
I'll tell you why. IMO they irritating to use. I have a Subaru with a gated shifter......it is one of the VERY few things on the car I really dislike.

Quote:
The spy shooters of KGP have snagged us one heckuva get -- these are the best shots to date of the 2009 Chevy Camaro caught on a car trailer -- including the very first interior shots we've yet seen. We'll have all the shots up in a moment, but we've got the full spy report below the jump. UPDATE: All the photos added below. Looks like the interior's remaining true to the concept interior and one thing's for sure about the exterior -- it's certainly got big tires and as we saw earlier -- a B-pillar. And these pictures show us a much more clear look at the deisgn integration than the first Camaro spy photos we shared with you last month -- or better than the sneaky Camaro camera-phone shot.
UPDATE #2: Apparently we got Bob Lutz so upset by posting these spy photos he's decided "to heck with it" and he's pulling the covers off all of the Chevy Camaro testers. Who knew we could have such an impact?
Edit: Got it!The spy shooters of KGP have snagged us one heckuva get -- these are the best shots to date of the 2009 Chevy Camaro caught on a car trailer -- including the very first interior shots we've yet seen. We'll have all the shots up in a moment, but we've got the full spy report below the jump. UPDATE: All the photos added below. Looks like the interior's remaining true to the concept interior and one thing's for sure about the exterior -- it's certainly got big tires and as we saw earlier -- a B-pillar. And these pictures show us a much more clear look at the deisgn integration than the first Camaro spy photos we shared with you last month -- or better than the sneaky Camaro camera-phone shot.
UPDATE #2: Apparently we got Bob Lutz so upset by posting these spy photos he's decided "to heck with it" and he's pulling the covers off all of the Chevy Camaro testers. Who knew we could have such an impact?



Source: http://jalopnik.com/339979/2009-chev...interior-shots
Lexus Fanatic
even though the centre console looks like crap (i do like the dual pod gauges and the 4 gauges by the shifter), i bet this car will sell like hot pancakes
at least they are beating Toyota at the sports car market
lol
at least they are beating Toyota at the sports car market
lol
Lexus Fanatic
Quote:
second! ... it (insert subject relating to 'retro') went away because something better came along, why would you like to regess back to it?Originally Posted by Stage3
This whole "retro" crap needs to go away... ^^^True.
See what happens when you replace leather and aluminum with cloth and plastics...
See what happens when you replace leather and aluminum with cloth and plastics...
Lexus Fanatic
and use better plastic and vinyl for f***'s sake...
retro is fine but no need to go so cheap pretending the 60's and 70's was the stone age
retro is fine but no need to go so cheap pretending the 60's and 70's was the stone age











