Mercedes-Benz News & Business Thread
The luxury minivan could be successful but this thing is an EV and a Minivan and MB thinks this can sell in US lol
The MB dealers must be crying especially since they just got through the whole EQ debacle.
The MB dealers must be crying especially since they just got through the whole EQ debacle.
I like the MB minivan. It would definitely be of interest to us, with the fact that it's an EV being a very big plus. We only lost interest in the VW ID.Buzz because it was down on range and power and this addresses that plus it brings the option of a much nicer interior

When I lived in Mexico I remember these A-series, and I had looked at an A190 to have as a second vehicle there.
Mercedes ended up taking a bath on these vehicles, but I hope for their sake they can produce something that will work for the US market.
My family had an 87 and a 93 190E 2.6 that both ended up lasting almost 20 years each and it is that lasting memory of endurance that I only now see in Lexus.
When I lived in Mexico I remember these A-series, and I had looked at an A190 to have as a second vehicle there.
Mercedes ended up taking a bath on these vehicles, but I hope for their sake they can produce something that will work for the US market.
My family had an 87 and a 93 190E 2.6 that both ended up lasting almost 20 years each and it is that lasting memory of endurance that I only now see in Lexus.
.....Probably, but, in doing so, they will likely need more repairs than the tank-like Mercedes products of before 2000......true repairs, not just the normal wear-items.
If it comes here as an EV like this new EV MB van, it will be doa.
You can also see that newer cars are lasting longer and longer on average, you didn't see many 1990 Mercedes rolling around in 2010 but you see countless late 90s early 2000s still around and a huge amount of 2010 era cars with well over 150k miles
% on the road vs age stats are great to see how much more reliable newer stuff usually is vs perceived better older cars.
i'm gonna say it largely depends on the nature of those miles (highway vs. city etc...) and how quickly they're put on... if someone's driving 40,000 miles a year from largely long trips i don't see why not, especially when it comes to their V8 cars
and before 2000 the mercedes ML came out, their first suv/crossover… made in beautiful Alabama. what an absolute pile of junk for several years.
but modern mercedes can be problematic too… my gf got a glb (cuv box) a couple of years ago which she really liked, but only kept it a year due to ENGINE FAILURE (cracked head). absurd.
Last edited by bitkahuna; Mar 12, 2026 at 07:16 AM.
about being “tank-like” - they were certainly heavy as tanks, lol, but that doesn’t mean they were reliable. around 2001 my old boss bought a ‘slightly used’ s-class… man what a DISASTER… air suspension broke, endless dash lights coming on, and on and on. i think a new s-class would be profoundly more reliable.
and before 2000 the mercedes ML came out, their first suv/crossover… made in beautiful Alabama. what an absolute pile of junk for several years.
but modern mercedes can be problematic too… my gf got a glb (cuv box) a couple of years ago which she really liked, but only kept it a year due to ENGINE FAILURE (cracked head). absurd.
and before 2000 the mercedes ML came out, their first suv/crossover… made in beautiful Alabama. what an absolute pile of junk for several years.
but modern mercedes can be problematic too… my gf got a glb (cuv box) a couple of years ago which she really liked, but only kept it a year due to ENGINE FAILURE (cracked head). absurd.
That's the W220 S class, introduced in 1998; that's probably the worst S class in history manufactured in the darkest period of Mercedes in cost cutting and quality. The W140 S-class(1991to 98) before it is much better in terms of quality.
Last edited by Gojirra99; Mar 12, 2026 at 07:33 AM.













