When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
AI is a set of enhanced optimization algorithms and search functions developed and programmed by humans with intelligence, so there cannot be any earthly intelligence greater than that developed by the human mind. Superintelligence is currently a great buzzword designed by sales teams of various AI companies in Silicon Valley so ignore it.
I strongly disagree with this. AI can and will become much smarter than any human we're talking about the totality of human knowledge in one entity. Parlay that into self driving, same thing the best aspects of the best drivers combined with 8 cameras and much faster reflexes means a much better driver than any human. This will happen the trend is very clear.
Is Boston Dynamics integrating AI into their super sophisticated robots yet? That's scary to me.
Thank you for jumping in the discussion.
I have no idea about your question, maybe someone does
All I know is the auto & car parts factories are heavily automated and robotic for many years but I'm not sure where the direction is going.
Basic camera recognition started many years ago for basic stuff such as sorting things or finding materials faults in finished products but don't know where it's at now because everythjng is advancing so fast.
The problem with Boston Dynamics is they are unable to commercialize their tech. Making a few robots is easy making them at scale and at a profit is 1000x more difficult. The company has been around for 33 years that's in theory one hell of a first mover advantage.
Not to argue, but you can't really "debunk" theology.
You can, you can say I don't believe in that, or that doesn't make logical or scientific sense to me. There are many things in Christianity, Judaism and other theist beliefs that don't make sense, and I respect people who come to those conclusions. The problem I have with Dawkins is he comes to an absolute conclusion, which is a form of religious zealotry. What I'm trying to say is, there are no absolutes. We can't prove an afterlife, but we can't disprove one either. The problem with Dawkins is he has concluded that an intelligent being absolutely doesn't exist, at least that's what I got from reading his books and watching his lectures. Hope that clears things up
You can, you can say I don't believe in that, or that doesn't make logical or scientific sense to me. There are many things in Christianity, Judaism and other theist beliefs that don't make sense, and I respect people who come to those conclusions. The problem I have with Dawkins is he comes to an absolute conclusion, which is a form of religious zealotry. What I'm trying to say is, there are no absolutes. We can't prove an afterlife, but we can't disprove one either. The problem with Dawkins is he has concluded that an intelligent being absolutely doesn't exist, at least that's what I got from reading his books and watching his lectures. Hope that clears things up
I do not intend to imply any criticism on anyone's beliefs. I just had a problem with the word "debunked" in relation to theology, and the reason for that is the only thing that can ever really be offered in support of a theological "debunking" is an alternative but equally non-provable belief.
I do not intend to imply any criticism on anyone's beliefs. I just had a problem with the word "debunked" in relation to theology, and the reason for that is the only thing that can ever really be offered in support of a theological "debunking" is an alternative but equally non-provable belief.
Anyway, back to EVs.
Noted, I used too strong a word
Last edited by AMIRZA786; Feb 28, 2025 at 01:49 PM.
ClubLexus Stories
Celebrating Lexus & Toyota from Around the Globe
Toyota and Lexus Join Mille Miglia For The First Time
Verdad Gallardo
Lexus NX 350h: A Fuel-Sipping Secret Hot Hatch???
Michael S. Palmer
5 Best & 5 Worst Lexus Daily Drivers
Joe Kucinski
Top 5 Hottest Lexus & Toyotas in 2026 (Hardest To Buy)
Brett Foote
2026 Lexus IS 350 F Sport Review: The Last of Its Kind Still Rocks
Michael S. Palmer
Top 10 Most Confusing Things Lexus Has Ever Done!
Joe Kucinski
2026 Lexus ES Review: Lexus Re-Embraces Founding Principles
Michael S. Palmer
10 Lexus Bargains That are Cheaper Than a New Toyota RAV4
VW put some thought into their drive unit gearing. I don't like the use of a shim to set bearing pre-load but this is common in automatic transmissions for example. Tesla is using giant bearings for the Plaid motor I wonder who makes them didn't see a brand mark.
VW put some thought into their drive unit gearing. I don't like the use of a shim to set bearing pre-load but this is common in automatic transmissions for example. Tesla is using giant bearings for the Plaid motor I wonder who makes them didn't see a brand mark.
All I know is shim washers for bearings are a must for tight tolerances- only because it removes axial shaft play. 🐢
The machine work must have enough variability that can't be corrected. Like valve lash, every modern engine ever made has to compensate for the variable gap between the valve stem and camshaft.
I strongly disagree with this. AI can and will become much smarter than any human we're talking about the totality of human knowledge in one entity. Parlay that into self driving, same thing the best aspects of the best drivers combined with 8 cameras and much faster reflexes means a much better driver than any human. This will happen the trend is very clear.
It remains to be seen if bad human driving is attributed to purely the lack of a library's worth of information (in which case your definition and reasoning for AI accelerating the progress in self driving is a self fulfilling prophecy) or something more that requires motivation, self-awareness, and the formation of concepts (which at this moment is just not feasible with AI.)
It remains to be seen if bad human driving is attributed to purely the lack of a library's worth of information (in which case your definition and reasoning for AI accelerating the progress in self driving is a self fulfilling prophecy) or something more that requires motivation, self-awareness, and the formation of concepts (which at this moment is just not feasible with AI.)
TBD
This is false, FSD is trained by watching humans drive it understands concepts like speed, motion prediction, signs, curbs, turns, traffic signals, pedestrians, animals, stationary objects, toll booths and many other aspects. It also does accident avoidance better than most people.
Also Waymo autonomously takes 150,000 trips every week.
Ok, this is getting deep and I love it.
On one hand I can say a chess program is just a mathematical program.
So is a car that uses an array of sensors to "drive".
But, I put that in quotes because it's just using sensor feedback to not hit anything, all mathematical.
Camera vision driving would be a whole different level if it recognizes patterns like humans, Imo.
Is consciousnes heavy computational or is there actual "awareness", jury is still out on that because many scientists think consciousness is outside the body.
Is this "awareness" something that AI can actually do, I don't know.
But as far as driving goes, oh yeah we set the bar low already. Haha
I agree with everything you say and it just asks more questions. 🏆
Ps, I cant stand Richard Dawkins but that's on me. Lol
If AI could develop awareness or consciousness, I guess AI could develop bad habits and road rage
Toyota and Lexus Join Mille Miglia For The First Time
Slideshow: A five-car lineup spanning more than five decades of Toyota performance and engineering will tackle one of Italy's most celebrated automotive routes.