When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
So their judgement about the styling is wrong because you disagree with it but their judgement about the engine is right because you agree? Got it.
It is a shame that engine is gone, but I understand why it’s gone.
Stopped by MB today on my way up to get the Pacifica washed (finally after the trip) got to see the new Moonlight White that replaces rhe Diamond White my car is. Much better! One issue I have always had with the diamond white is it can look cream-ish in some lighting.
So their judgement about the styling is wrong because you disagree with it but their judgement about the engine is right because you agree? Got it.
It is a shame that engine is gone, but I understand why it’s gone.
Stopped by MB today on my way up to get the Pacifica washed (finally after the trip) got to see the new Moonlight White that replaces rhe Diamond White my car is. Much better! One issue I have always had with the diamond white is it can look cream-ish in some lighting.
Looks white to me. What I don’t like is the white roof part. Would look way better all blacked out
I like the Moonlight White. Our X3 is Mineral White Metallic which also is similar to Lexus pearl white. We've been happy with it so far. BMW also has Arctic White which isn't metallic.
So their judgement about the styling is wrong because you disagree with it but their judgement about the engine is right because you agree? Got it.
Say what?? You really make this more complicated than it has to be. I think the previous gen looked a lot better, and the one before that (that offered a V6) too. This new Accord looks pretty good everywhere but the rear, but it's pretty boring. Last 2 gens looked great.
And I was simply pointing out that Car and Driver themself is disappointed as well that the good engine is gone, not just me. More than .0000001% of the population cares about a decent engine.
Say what?? You really make this more complicated than it has to be. I think the previous gen looked a lot better, and the one before that (that offered a V6) too. This new Accord looks pretty good everywhere but the rear, but it's pretty boring. Last 2 gens looked great.
And I was simply pointing out that Car and Driver themself is disappointed as well that the good engine is gone, not just me. More than .0000001% of the population cares about a decent engine.
I totally agree the previous Accord looked much better. This one is very odd looking in front.
And being disappointed the engine is gone and saying Honda should bring it back are different things. Of course C&D is disappointed about the engine, they are an enthusiast magazine. Most people are not enthusiasts, and certainly most people who buy Accords are not. I'm disappointed its gone, but I don't think Honda should bring it back, they don't need to. Anyways don't you hate 4 cyls?
From the C&D article you posted:
While low take rates are largely to blame for those calls
Even with their disappointment over losing the 2.0t engine Car and Driver still ranks the Accord #1 in the segment and it's still on their 10 Best list for 2024.
Even with their disappointment over losing the 2.0t engine Car and Driver still ranks the Accord #1 in the segment and it's still on their 10 Best list for 2024.