Notices
Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Innova

coming big uaw strike?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 18, 2023 | 08:39 AM
  #91  
Mike728's Avatar
Mike728
Lexus Test Driver
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,449
Likes: 948
From: IL
Default

The biggest problem with unions, is that they don't promote excellence. They are designed to ensure all employees are on the same level. Overachievers are not welcome.
Old Sep 18, 2023 | 09:06 AM
  #92  
swajames's Avatar
swajames
Lead Lap
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 3,901
Likes: 1,511
From: San Diego, CA
Default

If we generally accept that cars built in Japan and Germany tend to set the industry benchmarks, it’s worth remembering that Japanese and German auto workers are substantially unionized.
Old Sep 18, 2023 | 09:08 AM
  #93  
LexFinally's Avatar
LexFinally
Pole Position
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 2,533
Likes: 1,358
From: IL
Default

Originally Posted by RNM GS3
That quote symbolizes how little unions know or care about financial viability of making a profit. 5% is a huge number if that is even accurate and how does that compare to manufacturing costs from competitors or overseas production.
Except there's nothing the union can do, or wants to do, that makes a 5% difference in car costs. If the union got a 20% pay hike, then labor would be only 6% of car costs. Even if they got a 40% pay hike, they'd only be 7% of car costs.

At the bottom line, consumers aren't migrating away from US brands because the price is 1% too high. And if that increment were the breaking point, then the car companies would have funneled some of their profits into cost control. Instead, they used it to finance $5,000,000,000 in stock buybacks—mostly to jack up executive pay, since a lot of CEO compensation is tied to the stock price.
Old Sep 18, 2023 | 09:12 AM
  #94  
LexFinally's Avatar
LexFinally
Pole Position
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 2,533
Likes: 1,358
From: IL
Default

Originally Posted by swajames
one of the most effective political con jobs over the last 50 years has been the steady and effective effort to convince the American middle class to vote and take positions against their own best interests but beneficial to the interests of those significantly wealthier than them.

quality generally-available healthcare that isn’t tied to your job and doesn’t bankrupt people: bad.

free or affordable four-year degrees or quality vocational training: bad

tax burdens that disproportionally fall on lower and more middle income families: good

Caps on social security taxes that massively benefit the wealthy at the expense on lower and more middle income families: good.

And so on. It’s clearly working, as you can see from many posts in this very thread. Most people are an unexpected pink slip on a Friday away from being royally screwed as soon as the following Monday, yet they’ve let themselves be manipulated to think it will never happen to them and that it’s ok that it happens to others.

remember, folks, that rising tides float all boats. It doesn’t need to be a zero sum game. Others don’t all need to lose for us all - individually and collectively- to win.
100% agree, james. And the same goes for the generations-long campaign to make us all hate on unions as the source of our problems. Union membership has plunged since the Reagan assault from about 30% of private-sector US workers to well under 10%. Union contracts once set the standard that all employers felt compelled to compete with, or they couldn't get workers. It's no coincidence that as unions have crumbled, so have middle-class US living standards—all while corporate profits and stockholder values have soared. Are unions perfect? No. Are workers better off with a counterforce to the power of billionaires, or without one? Some of us seem to disagree on that answer.
Old Sep 18, 2023 | 01:32 PM
  #95  
mmarshall's Avatar
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 94,222
Likes: 220
From: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Default

Originally Posted by TangoRed
No, Stellantis is not run by Fiat. The Stellantis CEO is Carlos Tavares who came from what used to be PSA. John Elkann from the Agnelli family in the Chairman and has a 14% stake but is by no means running the company.
OK, half a cigar. Technically, Stellantis is under a partnership between FCA and PSA.
Old Sep 18, 2023 | 01:37 PM
  #96  
TangoRed's Avatar
TangoRed
Lead Lap
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,585
Likes: 24
From: Washington
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
OK, half a cigar. Technically, Stellantis is under a partnership between FCA and PSA.
Neither technically nor half a cigar. Stellantis formed from a merger of PSA and FCA. It is not a partnership of any sort but wholly new company. There's been some leadership changes involved and new talent has been hired since its formation. Now that the Tonale and Hornet have been unveiled, all new product from this point on has its origins in this new company built on shared technology and platforms that span all of the brands.

Last edited by TangoRed; Sep 18, 2023 at 01:41 PM.
Old Sep 18, 2023 | 02:14 PM
  #97  
bitkahuna's Avatar
bitkahuna
Thread Starter
CL Community Team
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 80,471
Likes: 3,826
Default

Originally Posted by LexFinally
BTW, about this meme that labor costs are what's breaking the US carmakers' competitiveness:
i saw that quote/meme also. what i saw also:

According to a study by the Center for Automotive Research, the labor cost for building a vehicle typically accounts for about 8-12% of the total cost of a car.
and this article says 15% https://www.nbcnews.com/business/aut...akers-n716001#
Old Sep 18, 2023 | 02:42 PM
  #98  
stasek's Avatar
stasek
Advanced
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
 
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 689
Likes: 77
From: Illinois
Default

It's 5% of a $100k+ Escalade, but 15% of Escape.
Old Sep 18, 2023 | 02:49 PM
  #99  
LeX2K's Avatar
LeX2K
Lexus Fanatic
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 25,917
Likes: 4,274
From: Alberta
Default

Seems to me that could mean the difference between 5-10% operating margin and zero.
Old Sep 19, 2023 | 08:59 AM
  #100  
situman's Avatar
situman
Lead Lap
15 Year Member
Community Builder
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,820
Likes: 247
From: NY
Default

I agree that people should be paid fairly, but to ask for huge increases in additional to working 4 days a week is double dipping and greedy. The country hasnt seem a recession for far too long and people either forgot what its like to not have a job or are too young to experience layoffs and etc. I'm not saying people should be taken advantage of, but they shouldnt be greedy either or feel entitled.

Old Sep 19, 2023 | 09:05 AM
  #101  
situman's Avatar
situman
Lead Lap
15 Year Member
Community Builder
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,820
Likes: 247
From: NY
Default

Originally Posted by stasek
It's 5% of a $100k+ Escalade, but 15% of Escape.
I would think the personnel cost will be very similar for both vehicles. I'm going to assume it takes significantly longer and needing more personnel to build an Escalade than an Escape .

The cost may be significantly higher than X% when benefits and taxes are factored in. Total personnel cost is X*1.4 and people tend to ignore it since it doesnt hit their bank account, in other words a $100k employee will cost the company around $140k.
Old Sep 19, 2023 | 09:12 AM
  #102  
RNM GS3's Avatar
RNM GS3
Lexus Test Driver
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 8,127
Likes: 223
From: New York
Default

One thing i do agree with is CEO / Board / Executive Comp is way out of hand vs the average company workers. This is across every industry not just automotive. The truth is there are very few CEOs that deserve this compensation. Unfortunately the pay disparity has grown in absurd way between the top leaders and the rest.

The only way to correct this for government to incentivize companies to pay their employees more instead they punish them with excessive payroll taxes. Why not put a plan in place - we will lower the company’s tax burden X percent for X percent in pay increases to average workers not including executives. There are ways we can fix these issues if had some reasonable ppl in charge at these corporations and unions and politicians.
Old Sep 19, 2023 | 09:34 AM
  #103  
LeX2K's Avatar
LeX2K
Lexus Fanatic
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 25,917
Likes: 4,274
From: Alberta
Default

This is the big brain representing the workers.





Old Sep 19, 2023 | 09:42 AM
  #104  
situman's Avatar
situman
Lead Lap
15 Year Member
Community Builder
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,820
Likes: 247
From: NY
Default

Originally Posted by LeX2K
This is the big brain representing the workers.


Its those same "greedy" people that creates companies that in turn creates jobs.
Old Sep 19, 2023 | 11:45 AM
  #105  
mmarshall's Avatar
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 94,222
Likes: 220
From: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Default

So far, as I see it, the UAW has made one major error in the strike. Instead of striking at the three Ford/GM/Stellantis plants that they did (Wayne/Wentzville/Toledo), they should have, IMHO, hit the plants where the real profits are made by the companies...where the F-150, Silverado, and Ram trucks are made. The companies probably make more money on those three vehicles than anything else they sell.....hitting them there would make it far more likely to put the squeeze on them.

Last edited by mmarshall; Sep 19, 2023 at 11:50 AM.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:31 PM.