When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Youth, immaturity, and (possibly) mental illness.....never a very good combination.
I can see, though, why the defense may have waived the jury-trial and placed it in the hands of a judge...a jury would probably be overcome with emotion, and judges are often more objective.
Last edited by mmarshall; Aug 8, 2023 at 07:09 AM.
Nobody drives themselves into a building at 100MPH unless they are somehow mentally ill
Can't really argue with that....definitely not thinking clearly.
An interesting question is how she survived the crash when it killed two others in the car....the article doesn't say. Yes, the Camry is a well-built car, particularly the excellent 3rd-Generation version, but it certainly doesn't have the structural integrity or advanced safety features of, say, your S-Class. And the average 18 or 19-year-old, of course, is not going to own a six-figure S-class.
Youth, immaturity, and (possibly) mental illness.....never a very good combination.
I can see, though, why the defense may have waived the jury-trial and placed it in the hands of a judge...a jury would probably be overcome with emotion, and judges are often more objective.
I'm assuming she was the only one with a seat belt on, but the article didn't specify
Yeah, that takes us back to Paris in 1997, when Princess Diana and her Egyptian boyfriend were killed in that underpass-wreck when the Paparazzi was chasing them. Her bodyguard was the only one to survive (they were in a Mercedes S-Class)...and was the only one belted up.
And that brought up an interesting question that has apparantly never been resolved....why, as Diana's official bodyguard, and the one most directly responsible for her safety, did he not make sure she was belted? Of course, she could (?) have said no to a seat belt, and, with her being royalty, he would not have been in a position to argue with her.
Last edited by mmarshall; Aug 9, 2023 at 11:34 AM.
Yeah, that takes back to Paris in 1997, when Princess Diana and her Egyptian boyfriend were killed in that underpass-wreck when the Paparazzi was chasing them. Her bodyguard was the only one to survive (they were in a Mercedes S-Class)...and was the only one belted up.
And that brought up an interesting question that has apparantly never been resolved....why, as Diana's official bodyguard, and the one most directly responsible for her safety, did he not make sure she was belted? Of course, she could (?) have said no to a seat belt, and, with her being royalty, he would not have been in a position to argue with her.