Lu Bu's IS-F
How long have you had your Acuras? Any major problems?
Have you ever driven an RX to compare against the ZDX?
Previously owned:
-2012 Acura TL SH-AWD 6AT, 10 months and ~10,600 miles (Sold @ 192.6k)
-2011 Acura TL SH-AWD 6MT, 10 months and ~8,000 miles (Sold @ 225.2k)
My current stable:
-2013 Acura TL SH-AWD 6AT, 10 months and ~6,800 miles since purchase (Currently @ 158.3k)
-2010 Acura ZDX, 6 months and ~10,800 miles since purchase (Currently @ 182.8k)
All of my Acura's have only had routine maintenance done. When I purchase a vehicle, I typically change all of the filters, and all of the fluids. I only replace brake pads and brake rotors if necessary. Any issues that arise, I replace or repair as needed. Thus far, with my recent Acura purchases, no issues have arisen outside of routine maintenance.
My IS F is the first Lexus that I've ever owned, and driven. I purchase a car because I want that specific car, not because I'm cross shopping a genre and its competition. I didn't consider any other vehicle when I was set on buying a ZDX. I've essentially been purchasing the cars from my bucket list from ~2009-2010 when I worked at dealerships.
Last edited by LuBu; Feb 25, 2024 at 04:23 PM.
Tire Rack bundled Aluminum hubcentric rings with my PF01's and they work well. On other setups, I have had both nylon/plastic and Aluminum rings. I prefer Aluminum because in my experience they are more robust and last longer. I have had to replace several nylon/plastic rings after tire/service shop mistreatment, to the extent that I keep spares on hand for that car. Smaller rings are easier to mangle, but the ones needed for the PF01's (460-895-6645BK) are thick and beefy, so damage should be less of an issue regardless of material composition.
I personally prefer closed lugs to mitigate corrosion risk. For these wheels with their deep lug pockets, I wanted the smallest hex diameter possible to avoid socket scars on the wheels. The ones Tire Rack sent were so large that I could barely get my nylon-sleeved sockets to work with them. Fail. I went with Ray's W171215B (17mm hex). Multeki 41886B should also work well.
Last edited by ChpEng; Feb 26, 2024 at 07:57 PM.
Once the salt is clear, I will pull out the IS F from storage and start taking pictures of it. In the meantime, I will practice more on the ZDX.
im also 18” wheel hunting.
check these out:
Konig Heliogram 18x9.5 +35 offset konig wevsite says they’re 19.67 lb, rollforged light. And reasonably priced. At around $1200 a set.
im probably staying staggered though, so ima order these. But 18x9.5 +35 fronts
and 18x10.5 + 25 rears @ 20.49lbs
In bronze finish (I also used to have a blue STi back in the days and gold stock bbs’s looked good with blue)
my is-f is same blue now.
also take a look at motegi mr145 tracklight wheels.
kotegi has those in 18x9.5” with a whopping + 45 offset
so square set up + around $850-900 and best of all these are also rollforged and @ 19.5 pounds a piece.
i was thinking of grabbing those at first, cause +45 offset is actualy closest to our own stock +45front 19’s and rear +55 set up.
i passed on motegis only cause they don’t make a 10.5” wide for rears.
good luck.
(Btw there are guys that fit 275/35/18 square and swear they don’t rub up front on factory suspension, just someone else’s claim in wheels/tires thread, so don’t take my word for it, but worth checking out if your set on staying square)
our IS-F’s really need that 275mm in the back minimum if you’re planing to do headers/tune/intake eventually.
good luck. And welcome to the community
Last edited by nepereziva; Mar 4, 2024 at 05:21 PM.
(Previously owned. Estimated to make around ~300 WHP, ~330WTQ.)
1) 2004 Subaru Impreza WRX STi:
~3,260 lb curb weight
300 crank horsepower
300 crank torque
3,260 / 300 = 10.86 lb/hp ratio
(Previously owned.)
2) 1998 Audi A8 Quattro
~3,900 lb curb weight
300 crank horsepower
295 crank torque
3,900 / 300 = 13.00 lb/hp ratio
(Previously owned.)
3) 2007 Acura TL Type-S 5AT
~3,674 lb curb weight
286 crank horsepower
256 crank torque
3,674 / 286 = 12.84 lb/hp ratio
(Currently own.)
4) 2013 Acura TL SH-AWD 6AT:
~3,968 lb curb weight
305 crank horsepower
273 crank torque
3,968 / 305 = 13.00 lb/hp ratio
(Currently own.)
5) 2008 Lexus IS F:
~3,780 lb curb weight
416 crank horsepower
371 crank torque
3,780 / 416 = 9.08 lb/hp ratio
(~$30,000-35,000 price range.)
6) 2007 Corvette Z06
~3,132 lb curb weight
505 crank horsepower
470 crank torque
3,132 / 505 = 6.20 lb//hp ratio
Obviously, the power to weight ratio doesn't depict the entire painting. I do know, that at least for myself, FWD will never be the answer. I'll hold reservation for RWD for once I experience a RWD car that has an LSD. SH-AWD has been irreplaceable thus far, though, at least for a daily driver in OH. I'm also curious and eager to experience how much of a difference the square wheel setup will make once I have it established on my IS F this upcoming summer.
Celebrating Lexus & Toyota from Around the Globe
(Currently own.)
7) 2022 Husqvarna Vitpilen 401
~340 lb curb weight
44 crank horsepower
27 crank torque
340 / 44 = 7.72 lb//hp ratio
The room for error on a 200+ HP motorcycle must be astronomically low. I had a 2007 Honda CBR 600RR around 2016, and I felt that it wasn't worth the risk on the street, so I can't imagine the liter bikes. I also had a 2012 Honda CBR 250R before the Vitpilen, and it was too weak, in my opinion. The Vitpilen has the perfect amount of power for urban riding.
The seat is the aspect that must be affecting my perception. The seat in the IS F is planted, and has no slop/sway from its position. This is why the car doesn't seem to feel as fast as the speedometer indicates. I'm planted in the same position throughout the entire driving experience. In the TL and ZDX, there is movement in the seat during acceleration and hard turns.
Next tasks will be an oil change, and to swap out the driver's side exhaust garnish.
It seems that the simplest solution to the TPMS issue to actually replace the TMPS sensor... I don't want to alter any wiring.








