Notices
SC - 1st Gen (1992-2000)

Should I?

Old Jun 9, 2009 | 11:58 AM
  #1  
986ci's's Avatar
986ci's
Thread Starter
Pole Position
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
From: Tx
Default Should I?

I have a 1992 SC300, I looked at a 1992 SC400, all maintaince records and services are complete on both cars, but the SC400 is by far an over nicer condition car. SO my question is there are alot of 300's here but I don't see to many 400's and definatly not moded like I've seen. So pro's / cons over making the switch? Or a basic yes or no with a good reason.
btw mileage is 116k on mine and mileage on the 400 is 108k
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2009 | 12:19 PM
  #2  
Hil's Avatar
Hil
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (61)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7,046
Likes: 2
From: UCLA
Default

I would switch em. Just because the SC400 sounds nicer. Plus it's just me but I wouldn't really think about boosting so I wouldn't prefer an SC300 in that case. Straight off the bat the SC4 would be quicker. Gas mileage might be a bit worse on the SC4. There is plenty of info on the forums showing the differences between the two. Just look em up and hopefully it will help your decision
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2009 | 12:20 PM
  #3  
Jay-Balrog's Avatar
Jay-Balrog
Driver
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
From: fl
Default

300 is easier to mod. twin turbo engine is a direct swap which it isnt in the 400 (needs different motor mounts if im not mistaken)

even if you stay stock pretty much everything is made for the 2jz cus of our cooler, more popular cousin with the same motor. the 1uz. not so much.


if you just want a cruiser, dont plan on doing much more to the motor then exhaust id get the 400 since its quicker from the factory.

if you plan on modding for speed. keep yours.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2009 | 12:26 PM
  #4  
986ci's's Avatar
986ci's
Thread Starter
Pole Position
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
From: Tx
Default

Well I have the Shelby for speed, my target was right around 400hp, so since the 4 is 385hp (if i'm not mistaken) i'm already pretty much at my target. Mainly want a nice RELIABLE quick car
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2009 | 12:31 PM
  #5  
Ryeno's Avatar
Ryeno
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,262
Likes: 0
From: NA
Default

not really worth it, if you want a 400 get a 98+ vvti model.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2009 | 12:36 PM
  #6  
986ci's's Avatar
986ci's
Thread Starter
Pole Position
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
From: Tx
Default

Mainly wanting a cheap daily, this won't be a "project car" will put good suspension, wheels, tint, stereo and then leave it alone. So a 1998 as nice as it would be really isn't a cheap cash car like this one is.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2009 | 12:37 PM
  #7  
Jewcano's Avatar
Jewcano
No Sir, I Don't Like It
CL Folding 1,000,000
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,754
Likes: 11
From: Jax, FL
Default

I was pulling 21-22mpg out of my SC400 when I had it. That is with conservative driving. If you aren't going to mod it, pick that up, if you plan to mod, the 300 would be the easier choice.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2009 | 12:44 PM
  #8  
986ci's's Avatar
986ci's
Thread Starter
Pole Position
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
From: Tx
Default

Originally Posted by Jewcano
I was pulling 21-22mpg out of my SC400 when I had it. That is with conservative driving. If you aren't going to mod it, pick that up, if you plan to mod, the 300 would be the easier choice.
Only mods, wheels, tint, stereo and suspension
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2009 | 12:53 PM
  #9  
djb5118's Avatar
djb5118
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 583
Likes: 0
From: WA
Default

Originally Posted by 986ci's
Well I have the Shelby for speed, my target was right around 400hp, so since the 4 is 385hp (if i'm not mistaken) i'm already pretty much at my target. Mainly want a nice RELIABLE quick car
not sure where you found that number, but a 1992 sc400 does not have 385hp
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2009 | 12:55 PM
  #10  
986ci's's Avatar
986ci's
Thread Starter
Pole Position
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
From: Tx
Default

Originally Posted by djb5118
not sure where you found that number, but a 1992 sc400 does not have 385hp
what is the power then
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2009 | 12:55 PM
  #11  
986ci's's Avatar
986ci's
Thread Starter
Pole Position
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
From: Tx
Default

Originally Posted by djb5118
not sure where you found that number, but a 1992 sc400 does not have 385hp
what is the power then
and was I right the Sc300 makes 190hp?
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2009 | 12:57 PM
  #12  
Jay-Balrog's Avatar
Jay-Balrog
Driver
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
From: fl
Default

sc300 about 220. sc4 about 280.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2009 | 01:01 PM
  #13  
6SOARER's Avatar
6SOARER
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,234
Likes: 1
From: SoCal
Default

around 250 for the first gen 400's then the later years produced 250-290 with the VVT-i


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lexus_SC
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2009 | 01:06 PM
  #14  
Jewcano's Avatar
Jewcano
No Sir, I Don't Like It
CL Folding 1,000,000
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,754
Likes: 11
From: Jax, FL
Default

Originally Posted by Jay-Balrog
sc300 about 220. sc4 about 280.
Depends on the year, and Lexus was VERY generous with their ratings. They rated the 92 SC400 with 250 to the crank, which was around 200-225 to the wheels. With higher mileage, you can expect under 200.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2009 | 01:18 PM
  #15  
djb5118's Avatar
djb5118
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 583
Likes: 0
From: WA
Default

plus, the sc400 isn't really much faster than the sc300 in those generations. it is a bit heavier which hurts its 0-60 time if i remember correctly
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:40 AM.