NEW 2013 RDX vs CPO 2012 RX350
#16
If you're potentially going to put 150,000 miles on the vehicle while you own it, you'll be happier over the long haul with the Lexus. Not only is the predicted reliablility better, the warranty is there to back it up. To really get a good idea of the longevity, compare 2007 RX's for sale to 2007 RDX's. Find some with over 100,000 miles on them and test drive each one. Both of those are previous generations, but it will still tell you a lot about how each vehicle will hold up.
#17
I drove hte turbo 4 on the old RDX, it was noisy as hell with the turbo. The RDX was about $10K cheaper new than the RX, you can't compare used car prices of the same year...
#18
But yes, 13 RDX AWD with Navi is around 6-8K cheaper than 13 RX AWD equivalent.
#19
Last year I test drove the new RDX with the 6cyl. I wasn't that impressed.Since the new style had just came out they wanted over$40k for it. I test drove the 2012 RX and it was game over. I basically paid $3500.00 more for my RX but the Lexus wins hands down.
My Wife did not like the interior of the Acura at all. It can not compare with the Rx interior.
Go for the RX-350 you won't be disappointed.
My Wife did not like the interior of the Acura at all. It can not compare with the Rx interior.
Go for the RX-350 you won't be disappointed.
#20
Driver School Candidate
#21
Driver School Candidate
#23
The pursuit of F
Attachment 278090
Here is the rear view of the F Sport.
I added a F Sport Logo on the left side.
It was $32 at the Lexus store, the dealer had their name there and I made short work correcting that situation.
Looks like it belongs there.......gm
Here is the rear view of the F Sport.
I added a F Sport Logo on the left side.
It was $32 at the Lexus store, the dealer had their name there and I made short work correcting that situation.
Looks like it belongs there.......gm
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Aston01
RX - 3rd Gen (2010-2015)
6
05-25-12 07:44 PM