When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
It has the same engine as Fs. But they mentioned about weight reductions. Just don't know how those reductions are. It may be above RCF price range...
I don't think weight reductions are that much as Lexus is claiming that it will go 0-60 in less than 4.5 sec. =/ Now the LC F is the one to look forward too!
What's up with the title of this thread??? Utter *** compared to what?
IMO, the RC F looks better than the LC500. The LC500 will have the same engine and will cost more(at least 30k more). Lexus is making a BIG mistake putting the same motor into these cars(RC F, GS F, and now LC500). The performance will be relatively the same across all 3 vehicles. Let's hope they build an LC F and don't put an astronomical price tag on it. The future of F cars does not seem too bright unless Lexus makes a statement with the LC F.
Yeah, it's kind of a head scratcher. Why wouldn't Lexus up the hp a bit? If the car had 500+ hp and was lighter than the Fs, it might be worth another $20K.
Plan on around $120,000, if the 600+ HP F version gets built.
What's up with the title of this thread??? Utter *** compared to what?
IMO, the RC F looks better than the LC500. The LC500 will have the same engine and will cost more(at least 30k more). Lexus is making a BIG mistake putting the same motor into these cars(RC F, GS F, and now LC500). The performance will be relatively the same across all 3 vehicles. Let's hope they build an LC F and don't put an astronomical price tag on it. The future of F cars does not seem too bright unless Lexus makes a statement with the LC F.
Autoguide said that the Lexus representatives told them it was going to be less then 4100 lbs.
The sexy curves and flowing lines maintain a consistent tension in sheetmetal through to the rear end that features slimly designed, multi- layered tail lamps with a unique lighting effect that helps convey a sequential L motif. A rear diffuser and available active rear spoiler also help manage airflow during performance driving. It rides on machined cast aluminum 20-in. or available 21-in. forged aluminum wheels.
Overall, LOVE the LC, but it will be 30K+ over the RC F and significantly more (another 30K on top?) for the rumored twin-turbo 600 hp LC F.
LC is out of my budget, but the RC F is still "affordable" and although I love the styling of the LC, the RC F with it's bulging hood screams more "muscle/performance car" (which I like) compared to the LC's svelte low hood.
No mention of weight at all is a bad sign man, so don't count on that. And remember lighter would apply to even 1 lb. But I could bet my house it'll be even heavier than our RC-F. And way more expensive with everything leather and much more luxurious. But no way in hell it'd sell in the 6-figure range with that meager power. The RC-F is pushing the envelope already, and the crappy sales only confirm that. And if Lexus doesn't learn to adjust production to demand, it'd flop too. Nobody likes to see 5 to 10K discounts months after the car comes out. At least it'll have a valved exhaust. And didn't get to the suspension , but it better have adjustable shocks. We'll see when final production details transpire.
Before it was officially announced and the specs released I thought it might be worth seriously investigating...now I'm not too sure. If they offer an "F" version then I might take a closer look. Good looking car nonetheless, but I wish the performance would have been a lot more spectacular.
I agree with you, why have 3 cars with the same performance levels. My guess is the RCF will be retired or will get detuned to around 350 to 400 HP and a cheaper price and the LC500 will be the high performance car in the Lexus line up in the future. It makes no sense to have 2 2 door sport coupes on the floor with the same performance levels. Only Lexus knows the game plan
Originally Posted by Raykwon02
What's up with the title of this thread??? Utter *** compared to what?
IMO, the RC F looks better than the LC500. The LC500 will have the same engine and will cost more(at least 30k more). Lexus is making a BIG mistake putting the same motor into these cars(RC F, GS F, and now LC500). The performance will be relatively the same across all 3 vehicles. Let's hope they build an LC F and don't put an astronomical price tag on it. The future of F cars does not seem too bright unless Lexus makes a statement with the LC F.
I agree with you, why have 3 cars with the same performance levels. My guess is the RCF will be retired or will get detuned to around 350 to 400 HP and a cheaper price and the LC500 will be the high performance car in the Lexus line up in the future. It makes no sense to have 2 2 door sport coupes on the floor with the same performance levels. Only Lexus knows the game plan
It's to offer choice to the consumer with different body styles, materials quality, and designs.
The current F engine as the base LC 500's engine is telling of a more extreme engine for a future LC F.
I agree with you, why have 3 cars with the same performance levels. My guess is the RCF will be retired or will get detuned to around 350 to 400 HP and a cheaper price and the LC500 will be the high performance car in the Lexus line up in the future. It makes no sense to have 2 2 door sport coupes on the floor with the same performance levels. Only Lexus knows the game plan
I don't think so. By your logic, Chevrolet should cancel the Camaro since they have the Corvette. BMW should cancel M4, since they have M6. Also, the LC 500 is a high end luxury coupe which happens to be fast. It's aimed at the Mercedes S class coupe and BMW 6 series...not the AMG or M models...that will be s job for a LC F. LC is not meant to compete against M4 and S5.
