Notices
Performance Forced induction, intakes, exhausts, torque converters, transmissions, etc.

IS200t tune

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 16, 2019 | 04:48 AM
  #4246  
WhyHateTho's Avatar
WhyHateTho
Pit Crew
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 249
Likes: 44
From: GA
Default

Originally Posted by chezgk
Getting on the Dyno now for some OV remote tuning. Let's see how this goes...

What's on your grill?
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2019 | 05:06 AM
  #4247  
chezgk's Avatar
chezgk
Intermediate
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 289
Likes: 84
From: MNL PH
Default

Originally Posted by WhyHateTho
What's on your grill?
KC HiLites driving lamps. Baseline below (flashed back to stock, FTP charge pipe, TTi TMD) :


Reply
Old Nov 16, 2019 | 05:11 AM
  #4248  
WhyHateTho's Avatar
WhyHateTho
Pit Crew
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 249
Likes: 44
From: GA
Default

Originally Posted by chezgk
KC HiLites driving lamps. Baseline below (flashed back to stock, FTP charge pipe, TTi TMD) :

Keep us updated champ.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2019 | 05:33 AM
  #4249  
chezgk's Avatar
chezgk
Intermediate
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 289
Likes: 84
From: MNL PH
Default

Third file fixed throttle CELs. Overlayed to stock.


Reply
Old Nov 16, 2019 | 06:10 AM
  #4250  
Thirst16's Avatar
Thirst16
Rookie
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 53
Likes: 7
From: NC
Default

Originally Posted by chezgk
Third file fixed throttle CELs. Overlayed to stock.

Those look like very small gains. I get that max power gains are just part of the equation, but still. I was expecting a little more. This seems similar to the JB4.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2019 | 06:23 AM
  #4251  
chezgk's Avatar
chezgk
Intermediate
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 289
Likes: 84
From: MNL PH
Default

Originally Posted by chezgk
Third file fixed throttle CELs. Overlayed to stock.

Originally Posted by Thirst16
Those look like very small gains. I get that max power gains are just part of the equation, but still. I was expecting a little more. This seems similar to the JB4.
That was just to sort things out and keep you guys posted since throttle CELs were an issue to some. We're above that now. Will post final graphs later.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2019 | 08:43 AM
  #4252  
chezgk's Avatar
chezgk
Intermediate
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 289
Likes: 84
From: MNL PH
Default

As it is rather late in this part of the world, a screenshot of OV's latest FB post would have to suffice as a results announcement. They've uploaded some charts over there as well. I promise to write something more detailed tomorrow/later.

Am I happy with how everything finally turned out? I sure as heck am. Cheers all.


Last edited by chezgk; Nov 17, 2019 at 06:05 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2019 | 10:36 PM
  #4253  
tnilc's Avatar
tnilc
Instructor
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 782
Likes: 119
From: SoCal
Default

Originally Posted by chezgk
As it is rather late in this part of the world, a screenshot of OV's latest FB post would have to suffice as a results announcement. They've uploaded some charts over there as well. I promise to write something more detailed tomorrow/later.

Am I happy with how everything finally turned out? I sure as heck am. Cheers all.


Nice. NX's are FWD right? So less gains for RWD for IS200T and RC200T/RC300.

I want to buy but still want to see other member issues resolved before biting the bullet.
Reply
ClubLexus Stories

Celebrating Lexus & Toyota from Around the Globe

story-0

10 Lexus Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

8 Tips for Improving Your Hybrid or Plug-in Hybrid's Efficiency!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-2

10 Best Lexus Models No One Remembers

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

TRD Off-Road Premium: Best 2026 4Runner, Except This One Thing

 Michael S. Palmer
story-4

Top 10 Lexus & Toyotas to Drive Before You Die!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

Top 10 Lexus/Toyotas With The LEAST 5-Year Depreciation

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

Lexus LC500 Convertible Auction: A Preview of Rising Values?

 Brett Foote
story-7

GX 550 vs TX 550: Best 3-Row Luxury Lexus Family Hauler

 Michael S. Palmer
story-8

9 Best Lexus Models You Can Buy for Half Price (And 1 You Shouldn't!)

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

2026 Lexus NX Buyer's Guide: Models, Features, Prices & More!

 Brett Foote
Old Nov 18, 2019 | 03:49 AM
  #4254  
bartolini9's Avatar
bartolini9
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: PL
Default

It is clearly said above that's an AWD...

Yes, you have an option to buy NX with FWD only.
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2019 | 04:11 AM
  #4255  
chezgk's Avatar
chezgk
Intermediate
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 289
Likes: 84
From: MNL PH
Post Tune review

Originally Posted by tnilc
Nice. NX's are FWD right? So less gains for RWD for IS200T and RC200T/RC300.

I want to buy but still want to see other member issues resolved before biting the bullet.
Hi, my NX is AWD. You can expect bigger numbers with both RWD and FWD vehicles.

================================================================================================

Now, onto the tune review.

Some folks here might recall that I've had the following issues in the past:
  1. Flipped modes for 1.01G-C 02
  2. Weak low/mid-range due to my FTP charge pipe for 1.02
  3. Stock rev limiter for 1.02 despite 1.01G-C 02 having already bumped it up
With these in mind, I got into the remote tune session wishing for the following:
  1. Restored low/mid-range power lost from installation of aftermarket charge pipe
  2. Possibly increased top-end to take advantage of improved plumbing
  3. Safety margin to allow for bad gas
  4. Rev limiter raised back to 1.01G-C 02 levels
OV achieved all of the above and made the vehicle pull harder than even 1.01G-C 02. We got to hit 228 AWHP at some point, but I'm attaching below the chart that concluded our session, overlayed with the stock/factory tune's data in red.



While max figures are indicated, there are some things I wish to highlight that perhaps affect drivability more than the former:
  • At least 200 AWHP, the former peak, is now available from roughly 3800 to 6000 rpm.
  • The powerband widened a little towards the low-end and even more so towards the top-end. This makes staying in a lower gear longer before shifting into prime rev range possible, improving overall acceleration.
  • Rev limit increase to 6600+ rpm eliminates double upshifts at 6000 rpm, which happens when the vehicle decides to auto-upshift at the same time I do. I understand that this is not an issue with ISs.
  • I don't think dyno charts show this, but the vehicle seems to get to the top-end faster than before.
  • Throttle response is faster than ever.
I'll just go ahead and quote Mat's post-tune breakdown here:
Run notes: from graph >

2500 RPM torque gained > 47 ft lbs
3500 RPM torque gained > 26 ft lbs
4500 RPM torque gained > 24 ft lbs
5500 RPM torque gained > 45 ft lbs

Horsepower gains..
5500 RPM > 45 AWHP gained
5800 RPM > 52 AWHP gained
So, yeah. We pretty much saw gains everywhere. With this tune, my NX's the most fun to drive it's ever been. I'm also happy to have a perfect file to fall back to should future updates not work out for me - a "stable build" of sorts in software parlance.

Further notes and theories

It is without doubt that all of this wouldn't have been without Mat's skill. Having said this, a 50+ AWHP gain up top seems rather out of the ordinary, given the supposedly tiny stock turbo that comes with our 200ts. I theorize that the turbo muffler delete and aftermarket charge pipe played a role in this, since the factory part replaced by the latter had so much kinks and flow interruptions.

Now, don't get me wrong; I replaced the charge pipe as insurance, firmly believing that it will do nothing in the way of performance. I only started thinking about it when I noticed a decrease in low/mid-range in exchange for better top-end pull. Could it be that the increased total internal volume of the charge pipe, as a result of fewer kinks and despite having identical in/out diameters, delayed boost buildup, as there was a bigger space to pressurize? Did the smoother path work favorably up top, reducing compressor-side resistance - the compressor is connected to the turbine, after all - and increasing flow capacity?

I can't say for sure, but OV was definitely able to take advantage of my setup.

Last edited by chezgk; Nov 18, 2019 at 04:18 AM. Reason: clarity
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2019 | 04:49 PM
  #4256  
tnilc's Avatar
tnilc
Instructor
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 782
Likes: 119
From: SoCal
Default

Originally Posted by chezgk
Hi, my NX is AWD. You can expect bigger numbers with both RWD and FWD vehicles.

================================================================================================

Now, onto the tune review.

Some folks here might recall that I've had the following issues in the past:
  1. Flipped modes for 1.01G-C 02
  2. Weak low/mid-range due to my FTP charge pipe for 1.02
  3. Stock rev limiter for 1.02 despite 1.01G-C 02 having already bumped it up
With these in mind, I got into the remote tune session wishing for the following:
  1. Restored low/mid-range power lost from installation of aftermarket charge pipe
  2. Possibly increased top-end to take advantage of improved plumbing
  3. Safety margin to allow for bad gas
  4. Rev limiter raised back to 1.01G-C 02 levels
OV achieved all of the above and made the vehicle pull harder than even 1.01G-C 02. We got to hit 228 AWHP at some point, but I'm attaching below the chart that concluded our session, overlayed with the stock/factory tune's data in red.



While max figures are indicated, there are some things I wish to highlight that perhaps affect drivability more than the former:
  • At least 200 AWHP, the former peak, is now available from roughly 3800 to 6000 rpm.
  • The powerband widened a little towards the low-end and even more so towards the top-end. This makes staying in a lower gear longer before shifting into prime rev range possible, improving overall acceleration.
  • Rev limit increase to 6600+ rpm eliminates double upshifts at 6000 rpm, which happens when the vehicle decides to auto-upshift at the same time I do. I understand that this is not an issue with ISs.
  • I don't think dyno charts show this, but the vehicle seems to get to the top-end faster than before.
  • Throttle response is faster than ever.
I'll just go ahead and quote Mat's post-tune breakdown here:


So, yeah. We pretty much saw gains everywhere. With this tune, my NX's the most fun to drive it's ever been. I'm also happy to have a perfect file to fall back to should future updates not work out for me - a "stable build" of sorts in software parlance.

Further notes and theories

It is without doubt that all of this wouldn't have been without Mat's skill. Having said this, a 50+ AWHP gain up top seems rather out of the ordinary, given the supposedly tiny stock turbo that comes with our 200ts. I theorize that the turbo muffler delete and aftermarket charge pipe played a role in this, since the factory part replaced by the latter had so much kinks and flow interruptions.

Now, don't get me wrong; I replaced the charge pipe as insurance, firmly believing that it will do nothing in the way of performance. I only started thinking about it when I noticed a decrease in low/mid-range in exchange for better top-end pull. Could it be that the increased total internal volume of the charge pipe, as a result of fewer kinks and despite having identical in/out diameters, delayed boost buildup, as there was a bigger space to pressurize? Did the smoother path work favorably up top, reducing compressor-side resistance - the compressor is connected to the turbine, after all - and increasing flow capacity?

I can't say for sure, but OV was definitely able to take advantage of my setup.
crap how did I not see the AWD part. Haha. I just jumped to the numbers and graphs.
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2019 | 04:54 PM
  #4257  
tnilc's Avatar
tnilc
Instructor
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 782
Likes: 119
From: SoCal
Default

Originally Posted by chezgk
Hi, my NX is AWD. You can expect bigger numbers with both RWD and FWD vehicles.

================================================================================================

Now, onto the tune review.

Some folks here might recall that I've had the following issues in the past:
  1. Flipped modes for 1.01G-C 02
  2. Weak low/mid-range due to my FTP charge pipe for 1.02
  3. Stock rev limiter for 1.02 despite 1.01G-C 02 having already bumped it up
With these in mind, I got into the remote tune session wishing for the following:
  1. Restored low/mid-range power lost from installation of aftermarket charge pipe
  2. Possibly increased top-end to take advantage of improved plumbing
  3. Safety margin to allow for bad gas
  4. Rev limiter raised back to 1.01G-C 02 levels
OV achieved all of the above and made the vehicle pull harder than even 1.01G-C 02. We got to hit 228 AWHP at some point, but I'm attaching below the chart that concluded our session, overlayed with the stock/factory tune's data in red.



While max figures are indicated, there are some things I wish to highlight that perhaps affect drivability more than the former:
  • At least 200 AWHP, the former peak, is now available from roughly 3800 to 6000 rpm.
  • The powerband widened a little towards the low-end and even more so towards the top-end. This makes staying in a lower gear longer before shifting into prime rev range possible, improving overall acceleration.
  • Rev limit increase to 6600+ rpm eliminates double upshifts at 6000 rpm, which happens when the vehicle decides to auto-upshift at the same time I do. I understand that this is not an issue with ISs.
  • I don't think dyno charts show this, but the vehicle seems to get to the top-end faster than before.
  • Throttle response is faster than ever.
I'll just go ahead and quote Mat's post-tune breakdown here:


So, yeah. We pretty much saw gains everywhere. With this tune, my NX's the most fun to drive it's ever been. I'm also happy to have a perfect file to fall back to should future updates not work out for me - a "stable build" of sorts in software parlance.

Further notes and theories

It is without doubt that all of this wouldn't have been without Mat's skill. Having said this, a 50+ AWHP gain up top seems rather out of the ordinary, given the supposedly tiny stock turbo that comes with our 200ts. I theorize that the turbo muffler delete and aftermarket charge pipe played a role in this, since the factory part replaced by the latter had so much kinks and flow interruptions.

Now, don't get me wrong; I replaced the charge pipe as insurance, firmly believing that it will do nothing in the way of performance. I only started thinking about it when I noticed a decrease in low/mid-range in exchange for better top-end pull. Could it be that the increased total internal volume of the charge pipe, as a result of fewer kinks and despite having identical in/out diameters, delayed boost buildup, as there was a bigger space to pressurize? Did the smoother path work favorably up top, reducing compressor-side resistance - the compressor is connected to the turbine, after all - and increasing flow capacity?

I can't say for sure, but OV was definitely able to take advantage of my setup.
reading on my phone. So to clarify your only mods are TMD and charge pipe? Not sure if I missed any other mods since I’m on my phone.

I’m on a RC300, with TMD, PPE catless downpipe, invidia midpipes, and injen intake. I’m on a BMS stage 1 tune but still run stock axle backs. I’m excited at the possibilities.
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2019 | 05:24 PM
  #4258  
chezgk's Avatar
chezgk
Intermediate
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 289
Likes: 84
From: MNL PH
Default

Originally Posted by tnilc
crap how did I not see the AWD part. Haha. I just jumped to the numbers and graphs.
Haha no worries, mate. Totally understandable as I'm sure a lot of people have been waiting for info for quite some time now.

Originally Posted by tnilc
reading on my phone. So to clarify your only mods are TMD and charge pipe? Not sure if I missed any other mods since I’m on my phone.

I’m on a RC300, with TMD, PPE catless downpipe, invidia midpipes, and injen intake. I’m on a BMS stage 1 tune but still run stock axle backs. I’m excited at the possibilities.
As far as engine mods go, yes, the TMD and charge pipe are my only mods. Not even an intake or an aftermarket air filter. Mathew told me we could likely get to 60-70 AWHP gain with a downpipe and full exhaust, but the latter isn't something I want to do, and options for the former are too prohibitive at the moment, with the cheapest being over $1000. Having said these, there's a high chance you'd see higher gains on the RC than I did on mine.

As no turbo upgrade options would likely be coming for the NX, I think this reflash is the end of the road as far as my vehicle is concerned. Not too shabby, definitely, and plenty adequate for the kind of roads we have here. Maybe a Lotus Evora IPS (same transmission as the NX and transverse 6AT Toyota V6s) A/T valve body and Quaife helical diff in a few years - who knows. Ah, I digress.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2019 | 12:11 AM
  #4259  
tnilc's Avatar
tnilc
Instructor
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 782
Likes: 119
From: SoCal
Default

I hope there's more to hear from OVTune before that Black Friday Sale ends.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2019 | 12:50 PM
  #4260  
skyshadow's Avatar
skyshadow
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 423
Likes: 48
From: America
Default

Originally Posted by tnilc
I hope there's more to hear from OVTune before that Black Friday Sale ends.
Black friday sale??
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:02 AM.

story-0
10 Lexus Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

Slideshow: Some luxury cars chase trends, but these Lexus models look better now than they did when they first rolled into showrooms.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-06 17:58:29


VIEW MORE
story-1
8 Tips for Improving Your Hybrid or Plug-in Hybrid's Efficiency!

Slideshow: How to Get the Best Fuel Economy with a Hybrid and Plug-In Hybrid!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-05 20:54:44


VIEW MORE
story-2
10 Best Lexus Models No One Remembers

Slideshow: 10 best Lexus models no one remembers.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 17:33:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
TRD Off-Road Premium: Best 2026 4Runner, Except This One Thing

Slideshow: diving into 4Runner TRD Off-Road Premium's pricing, performance, fuel economy, features, and amenities!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-23 13:09:18


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 Lexus & Toyotas to Drive Before You Die!

Slideshow: the 10 Lexus and Toyota vehicles you need to drive before you die.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-23 10:34:24


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 Lexus/Toyotas With The LEAST 5-Year Depreciation

Slideshow: Top 10 Lexus/Toyota models with the lowest 5-year depreciation rate.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-08 12:19:06


VIEW MORE
story-6
Lexus LC500 Convertible Auction: A Preview of Rising Values?

The LC hasn't even disappeared from the Lexus lineup yet, and we're already seeing signs of an explosive market.

By Brett Foote | 2026-04-06 09:25:02


VIEW MORE
story-7
GX 550 vs TX 550: Best 3-Row Luxury Lexus Family Hauler

Slideshow: comparing the pricings, specs, power, fuel economy, fun-factor, and features of the GX 550 Luxury+ and TX 550h+ Luxury.

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-03-19 13:44:11


VIEW MORE
story-8
9 Best Lexus Models You Can Buy for Half Price (And 1 You Shouldn't!)

Slideshow: 9 best Lexus models you can buy for half price and 1 you should avoid

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-03-19 12:01:07


VIEW MORE
story-9
2026 Lexus NX Buyer's Guide: Models, Features, Prices & More!

Here's everything you need to know about the latest NX.

By Brett Foote | 2026-03-19 11:56:59


VIEW MORE