Performance Forced induction, intakes, exhausts, torque converters, transmissions, etc.

Why is the 2nd gen is350 quicker than the 3rd gen?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-13-23, 06:39 PM
  #1  
Idkyet2is
Pit Crew
Thread Starter
 
Idkyet2is's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Location: California
Posts: 118
Received 27 Likes on 27 Posts
Default Why is the 2nd gen is350 quicker than the 3rd gen?

I've been thinking and the gearing on the 3rd gen is more aggressive, but the car does weigh about 70 pounds more.

Is the weight difference enough to make it that much slower or is this a matter of other factors as well like:
1. Engine/transmission having some sort of "detuning" for fuel efficiency
2. extra drivetrain loss with different transmission, different drive shaft, or anything a part of the drive train.
​​​​​​3. different torque converter acting different like locking up at different times.

If anyone actually knows the reason why, please let me know I'm super curious
Old 11-14-23, 02:19 PM
  #2  
Gville350
Moderator
iTrader: (10)
 
Gville350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 11,573
Likes: 0
Received 433 Likes on 385 Posts
Default

I'd like to say it's because I own a 2IS; but I'm just partial to the looks and feel on my well-worn 2006 model year 350. LOL!
Old 11-17-23, 05:56 AM
  #3  
kenji211
Driver
 
kenji211's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: FL
Posts: 95
Received 27 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Idkyet2is
I've been thinking and the gearing on the 3rd gen is more aggressive, but the car does weigh about 70 pounds more.

Is the weight difference enough to make it that much slower or is this a matter of other factors as well like:
1. Engine/transmission having some sort of "detuning" for fuel efficiency
2. extra drivetrain loss with different transmission, different drive shaft, or anything a part of the drive train.
​​​​​​3. different torque converter acting different like locking up at different times.

If anyone actually knows the reason why, please let me know I'm super curious
I would say that the lower weight and higher FD ratio of the 2G IS350 certainly helps and are the main contributors.
Old 11-17-23, 07:57 AM
  #4  
Idkyet2is
Pit Crew
Thread Starter
 
Idkyet2is's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Location: California
Posts: 118
Received 27 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kenji211
I would say that the lower weight and higher FD ratio of the 2G IS350 certainly helps and are the main contributors.
The final drive doesn't matter because the 3is transmission gear ratios make up for it.
Old 12-13-23, 07:27 AM
  #5  
redspencer
OG Member
iTrader: (1)
 
redspencer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Central FL
Posts: 1,852
Received 529 Likes on 314 Posts
Default

Here's the best times that Road and Track had published for the 2IS250 and 3IS350 RWD models. We can see that the 2IS250 has a distinct advantage from 0-110mph but from 110-120mph, the additional gearing from the 3IS350 allows the car to catch up. IIRC, the stock 3IS350 dyno sheets posted tend to show a lower output to the wheels (245-255rwhp) than what a stock 2IS350 usually averages on a dynojet (260-270rwhp) though all dynos do have their deltas.



Old 12-13-23, 08:04 AM
  #6  
EdgarLex
Pit Crew
 
EdgarLex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: CA
Posts: 111
Received 28 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Idkyet2is
The final drive doesn't matter because the 3is transmission gear ratios make up for it.
I know on paper the gearing should be very similarly between the two, but when I owned my 2IS first gear was an absolute rocket. When I first bought it or whenever my family members drove it in parking lots they would shoot forward if it went into first gear lol. After a while it became muscle memory to lower your throttle input when you felt the car slowing down to first gear. I had no problems keeping up with Challengers, Mustangs, other sports cars from a dig (for a short while lol).

I can say with absolute confidence that this was smoothed out for the 8 speed transmission in both the 4GS and 3IS.

I am not engineer but I'd also be curious if comparing gear ratios to a final drive differential is apples to apples. Sure the transmission 1st gear may be 4.6 (3IS) over 3.5 (2IS) but how much of that advantage is lost with trans fluid, trans programming, trans engaging up etc.

If I had to chalk it up to something. I'd say tuning. I guess they felt it wasn't "Lexus" like. But typing this out made me miss my 2IS

Last edited by EdgarLex; 12-13-23 at 08:11 AM.
Old 12-13-23, 08:31 AM
  #7  
Idkyet2is
Pit Crew
Thread Starter
 
Idkyet2is's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Location: California
Posts: 118
Received 27 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

For anyone wondering, these are the actual ratios (transmission ratio × final drive. not including wheel size)
is350 A760E1st 14.37
2nd 8.32
3rd 5.71
4th 4.08
5th 2.93
6th 2.40
is350 AA81E
1st 14.39
2nd 8.53
3rd 5.83
4th 4.58
5th 3.85
6th 3.13
7th 2.58
8th 2.14
Old 12-13-23, 08:33 AM
  #8  
Idkyet2is
Pit Crew
Thread Starter
 
Idkyet2is's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Location: California
Posts: 118
Received 27 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by EdgarLex
I know on paper the gearing should be very similarly between the two, but when I owned my 2IS first gear was an absolute rocket. When I first bought it or whenever my family members drove it in parking lots they would shoot forward if it went into first gear lol. After a while it became muscle memory to lower your throttle input when you felt the car slowing down to first gear. I had no problems keeping up with Challengers, Mustangs, other sports cars from a dig (for a short while lol).

I can say with absolute confidence that this was smoothed out for the 8 speed transmission in both the 4GS and 3IS.

I am not engineer but I'd also be curious if comparing gear ratios to a final drive differential is apples to apples. Sure the transmission 1st gear may be 4.6 (3IS) over 3.5 (2IS) but how much of that advantage is lost with trans fluid, trans programming, trans engaging up etc.

If I had to chalk it up to something. I'd say tuning. I guess they felt it wasn't "Lexus" like. But typing this out made me miss my 2IS
I think you're right. I've been suspicious that the reason for the big difference is the tuning to make the car more "smooth" and Lexus like vs performance oriented
Old 02-23-24, 09:34 AM
  #9  
FennyMike
Pit Crew
 
FennyMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2021
Location: FL
Posts: 107
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Idkyet2is
I think you're right. I've been suspicious that the reason for the big difference is the tuning to make the car more "smooth" and Lexus like vs performance oriented
would custom tuning a 3IS change this?
Old 02-26-24, 12:13 AM
  #10  
Idkyet2is
Pit Crew
Thread Starter
 
Idkyet2is's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Location: California
Posts: 118
Received 27 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FennyMike
would custom tuning a 3IS change this?
Would custom tuning change the gear ratios? Not sure what u meant but all I know is it would make the car faster lol
Old 02-26-24, 04:21 PM
  #11  
2013FSport
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (2)
 
2013FSport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: OR
Posts: 6,449
Received 1,492 Likes on 1,242 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Idkyet2is
For anyone wondering, these are the actual ratios (transmission ratio × final drive. not including wheel size)
is350 A760E1st 14.37
2nd 8.32
3rd 5.71
4th 4.08
5th 2.93
6th 2.40
is350 AA81E
1st 14.39
2nd 8.53
3rd 5.83
4th 4.58
5th 3.85
6th 3.13
7th 2.58
8th 2.14
Adding to above using A760E - 4.083 vs AA81E - 3.12 rear gear.

Here is a table illustrating the differences. 7th and 8th omitted.


Obviously these are theoretical maximums and real world truth is there are significant drivetrain losses as power levels increase, us the trans is not in lockup at WOT and then there is TC slip and aerodynamic losses kicking in to make this table mostly useless.

If I could make my Fusion App log data I could post that which might bring us back to earth. lol

On paper with its quicker shifts, they seem like they should be neck and neck but that is not the case.
The following users liked this post:
TreysGS460 (02-28-24)
Old 02-26-24, 05:53 PM
  #12  
2013FSport
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (2)
 
2013FSport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: OR
Posts: 6,449
Received 1,492 Likes on 1,242 Posts
Default

Also, read the bottom of this about setting compensation codes for your transmission although it may only apply to AA81E and not out a760 or A960 (250).

It also talks about transmission relearn providing content on how to drive the car and what speeds for how long.
https://gearsmagazine.com/magazine/t...-transmission/

Likely not applicable to this but I found it while looking up AA81E info.
Old 02-28-24, 12:59 PM
  #13  
TreysGS460
Intermediate
 
TreysGS460's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Texas
Posts: 348
Received 147 Likes on 109 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 2013FSport
Adding to above using A760E - 4.083 vs AA81E - 3.12 rear gear.

Here is a table illustrating the differences. 7th and 8th omitted.

Could you do the same with the AA81 and a 4.08 reduction, so we can see how aggressive the individual gear ratios are when swapping diffs?

I would try, but my excel skills are WEAK
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
johnhol123
GS - 1st Gen (1993-1997)
10
02-04-24 08:13 AM
gmeardi
International
3
08-04-22 06:12 AM
flektone
IS - 3rd Gen (2014-present)
13
12-04-17 02:08 PM
BigVIPness
GS - 1st Gen (1993-1997)
15
01-02-04 12:21 PM
loonyrobert3
GS - 1st Gen (1993-1997)
1
11-30-02 03:31 AM



Quick Reply: Why is the 2nd gen is350 quicker than the 3rd gen?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:04 AM.