Premium fuel really needed?
Regarding the original question, I've checked the fuel mileage (the old-fashioned way, miles divided by gallons consumed) on perhaps 50-60 tank-fulls of premium vs. regular in my GX 470 and LX 570. With my vehicles and my driving styles, there is NO difference in fuel mileage (and none should be expected, IMO). I also don't notice any difference in the way either vehicle runs or performs on regular vs. premium. I've burned only regular (Top Tier brands) in the GX for the past 70K miles and in the LX for the past 24K, and both engines run as well as they ever did. IMO, the use of premium fuel for MOST people/vehicles is much like the 3,000 mile oil change; largely a marketing shenanigan.

With both 100 and 200 series, my experience is the same as yours. I use ethanol-free regular in both trucks and I'll go a bit out of my way to find it. Mileage is identical with 91 or 87 octane, and the ecu's will learn to optimize combustion settings with a change in fuel relatively quickly.
It states Premium "Required" not recommended. If you decide to use regular instead it will just cause additional wear to the engines combustion chamber. If your not a long term owner might not be a problem? But you might as well also save money and get your services done at jiffy lube and never do any service that is beyond minimum required or even less after your warranty is up. Also why wax, that clear coat should last for awhile with minimum care.
It is definitely not "the same exact engine". Land Cruisers and LX'x are built on a dedicated assembly line at Toyota Auto Body using engines assembled in Japan. The trucks are 100% Japanese content.
You can contrast that to Tundra / Sequoia engines assembled in the U.S. or perhaps Japan, with parts from somewhere, but not guaranteed to be all Japanese. Check https://forum.ih8mud.com/threads/200...labama.193063/
You can contrast that to Tundra / Sequoia engines assembled in the U.S. or perhaps Japan, with parts from somewhere, but not guaranteed to be all Japanese. Check https://forum.ih8mud.com/threads/200...labama.193063/
It states Premium "Required" not recommended. If you decide to use regular instead it will just cause additional wear to the engines combustion chamber. If your not a long term owner might not be a problem? But you might as well also save money and get your services done at jiffy lube and never do any service that is beyond minimum required or even less after your warranty is up. Also why wax, that clear coat should last for awhile with minimum care. 

Explain, if you would, how a decrease of 3-4 octane numbers "will just cause additional wear to the engines combustion chamber". Long or short term, it doesn't seem to be a problem.
You could also explain why ecu part numbers are the same for both the LX and the Cruiser...as are O2 sensors, catalytic converters, pcv valves, and just about anything else you can think of in the emissions systems.
Both our 100 and 200 series have been dealer-maintained during warranty, and local indy shop after warranty. You can understand that the most knowledgeable techs sooner or later start their own shop or get hired by one.
Both trucks are waxed twice a year by an experienced detailer who also takes care of the local Lexus dealer. I take care of wear and tear stuff...fluid and filter changes, plugs, etc. The FAA feels I'm competent to wrench on something you may fly on...the Toyota's don't seem to mind. 
Good try, though. Thanks for posting.
Last edited by hankinid; Dec 22, 2017 at 03:53 PM.
Interesting perhaps that you'd link to a document that doesn't support your claim.
Those catastrophic examples (the photos in your screen shot) are well-known consequences of severe detonation and overheating. The examples shown are almost certainly from high-boost, high specific output engines, not mundane, low specific output, naturally-aspirated engines like the LX. Or, they are the result of a severe issue in the engine, NOT a result of burning 87 octane fuel instead of 91 or 93.
Detonation or "knock-related" damage is avoided in modern engines via a number of tools including, but not limited to, super-effective knock sensors that quickly retard timing, enrich the fuel mixture, introduce additional EGR, and/or make other adjustments to prevent the knock and stop it from developing into detonation that causes the real damage. Hence the ability of modern engines to run perfectly well on fuels of much lower quality or knock resistance than our excellent Top Tier 87 octane fuels without any risk of damage.
If you want to know more about knock suppression methods you can read Section 5 of the article that you linked.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...60128516300764
Those catastrophic examples (the photos in your screen shot) are well-known consequences of severe detonation and overheating. The examples shown are almost certainly from high-boost, high specific output engines, not mundane, low specific output, naturally-aspirated engines like the LX. Or, they are the result of a severe issue in the engine, NOT a result of burning 87 octane fuel instead of 91 or 93.
Detonation or "knock-related" damage is avoided in modern engines via a number of tools including, but not limited to, super-effective knock sensors that quickly retard timing, enrich the fuel mixture, introduce additional EGR, and/or make other adjustments to prevent the knock and stop it from developing into detonation that causes the real damage. Hence the ability of modern engines to run perfectly well on fuels of much lower quality or knock resistance than our excellent Top Tier 87 octane fuels without any risk of damage.
If you want to know more about knock suppression methods you can read Section 5 of the article that you linked.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...60128516300764
Until someone can show me a study done on a dyno, with controlled parameters I'll go by what the manufacturer recommends in their owners manual. I see no reason a manufacturer could benefit from telling buyers to spend more money on gasoline that is required.
Show me the dyno results, then I'll believe there is no difference.
Show me the dyno results, then I'll believe there is no difference.
It seems that the LX570 and the LC have the same engine. Similar power and torque ratings that could be differentiated by intake and exhaust differences. Compression ratio is the same. However, the Lexus lists as requiring Premium, while the Toyota lists as needing only Regular. Does anyone know if there is an actual need for Premium?
If you want to know more about knock suppression methods you can read Section 5 of the article that you linked.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...60128516300764
https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...60128516300764
Looks like you did not understand the article after reading it. "Knock" "ping" is a bad thing and can over time damage and degrade your engines dependablity and long term viability. That is why manufactures have the ability to temporarily adjust for low quality fuel. Hence Lexus states Premium fuel "REQUIRED". if I am wrong about engine knock being a bad thing for my Lexus and why you and others on this site think that you know more then the engineers that developed this engine for the LX570 please site published information from Lexus that states they were wrong in requiring the "REQUIRED" use of premium gas.
Until someone can show me a study done on a dyno, with controlled parameters I'll go by what the manufacturer recommends in their owners manual. I see no reason a manufacturer could benefit from telling buyers to spend more money on gasoline that is required.
Show me the dyno results, then I'll believe there is no difference.
Show me the dyno results, then I'll believe there is no difference.
Looks like you did not understand the article after reading it. "Knock" "ping" is a bad thing and can over time damage and degrade your engines dependablity and long term viability. That is why manufactures have the ability to temporarily adjust for low quality fuel. Hence Lexus states Premium fuel "REQUIRED". if I am wrong about engine knock being a bad thing for my Lexus and why you and others on this site think that you know more then the engineers that developed this engine for the LX570 please site published information from Lexus that states they were wrong in requiring the "REQUIRED" use of premium gas.












