The 2017 LS 460 will be the last super reliable luxobarge
#16
Driver School Candidate
Thread Starter
I'm actually intrigued & excited for the turbo V6 in this LS - knowing it'll be sold in 90 countries, I'm confident the Lexus engineers are meticulous in designing not only performance but reliability. Given that the Ecoboost has done so well in mass-market vehicles, you throw in the Lexus brand and more $$, the LS500's V6 should be something to talk about...
I just hope that the new LS 500 still has that plush ride that the LS models are supposed to have.
#17
Driver
I don't understand the irrational fear of Turbocharged engines a lot of people have? Lexus and Toyota are well known for engine build quality and reliability, the 1JZGTE and 2JZGTE are well known in the performance world as being some of the strongest, most reliable performance engines ever built. The new GTR is Twin Turbo V6. So are countless other performance and luxury cars.
The reliability of these engines usually only becomes an issue when you modify them, just like any Lexus V8 could fall apart if you started messing with them too much.
They will be well built and if maintained correctly and not played with too much they will be fine.
I have a 20 year old V6 twin turbo Mitsubishi in my driveway at home, it is heavily modified and gets a flogging and hasn't skipped a beat. Either has my modified Evo at 16 years old.
Obviously there will be some division between people who want to drive a V8 vs a V6, but the reliability of the engine shouldn't be a terrible concern, especially if Lexus builds it.
On top of all this it opens up a whole new world of performance for Lexus, how many people here wish we could mod our cars more for performance. Driving a factory twin turbo Mid sized V6 will likely not feel too different to driving a quad cam high revving V8 that realistically doesn't make much power in the grand scheme of things. We shoudl all be excited to see where it goes in the future.
The reliability of these engines usually only becomes an issue when you modify them, just like any Lexus V8 could fall apart if you started messing with them too much.
They will be well built and if maintained correctly and not played with too much they will be fine.
I have a 20 year old V6 twin turbo Mitsubishi in my driveway at home, it is heavily modified and gets a flogging and hasn't skipped a beat. Either has my modified Evo at 16 years old.
Obviously there will be some division between people who want to drive a V8 vs a V6, but the reliability of the engine shouldn't be a terrible concern, especially if Lexus builds it.
On top of all this it opens up a whole new world of performance for Lexus, how many people here wish we could mod our cars more for performance. Driving a factory twin turbo Mid sized V6 will likely not feel too different to driving a quad cam high revving V8 that realistically doesn't make much power in the grand scheme of things. We shoudl all be excited to see where it goes in the future.
#18
Lead Lap
iTrader: (2)
Well, taking this argument to its extreme, a quad turbocharged 2 cylinder engine could conceivable make as much horsepower as our naturally aspirated V8, but no-one in their right mind is going to put one in a luxury automobile. It's not only about horsepower but smoothness, quietness and reliability (a 2 cylinder engine running continuously at 16,000 rpm isn't going to last as long as an 8 cylinder loafing along at 2,000 rpm).
#19
Driver School Candidate
Thread Starter
Well, taking this argument to its extreme, a quad turbocharged 2 cylinder engine could conceivable make as much horsepower as our naturally aspirated V8, but no-one in their right mind is going to put one in a luxury automobile. It's not only about horsepower but smoothness, quietness and reliability (a 2 cylinder engine running continuously at 16,000 rpm isn't going to last as long as an 8 cylinder loafing along at 2,000 rpm).
#20
Driver
Well, taking this argument to its extreme, a quad turbocharged 2 cylinder engine could conceivable make as much horsepower as our naturally aspirated V8, but no-one in their right mind is going to put one in a luxury automobile. It's not only about horsepower but smoothness, quietness and reliability (a 2 cylinder engine running continuously at 16,000 rpm isn't going to last as long as an 8 cylinder loafing along at 2,000 rpm).
We have small capacity quad cam V8's, not 7.0L big blocks. A good V6 TT will make more power, more torque, use less fuel, and be lighter than our engines. And there is no reason it would be any less reliable.
Edit: For the record, I'm not bashing the V8 at all, I love mine, but the power isn't particularly inspiring, and there is a reason Lexus isn't really looked at as a performance brand.
Last edited by MJG87; 06-01-17 at 07:10 PM.
#21
Lexus Fanatic
As to why has the LS gotten heavier, it's much bigger than your LS400, 10" longer to be precise.
#22
Lead Lap
iTrader: (2)
As far as reliability is concerned (again taking the example to the extreme). Formula 1 teams (using 1.6L turbocharged V6, 15,000 rpm, 1000 HP engines) will go through 8 engines a season (if they even make it through the entire season with the maximum allowed 8 engines). So high power, high revving, small capacity engines do have durability limitations.
#23
Driver
I don't think they would waste millions of dollar's and hundreds of thousands of man hours destroying the legendary smoothness and reliability our vehicles are known for. Definitely dont write them off just yet.
The Toyota Aristo (though it was TT Inline 6) was gloriously smooth even when driving a car 20+ years old.
The sound, thats a while different box of frogs, worlds apart but both lovely in different ways and much more a personal choice.
#24
Driver School Candidate
Thread Starter
I have a GS460, it is smooth as silk, you arent wrong. I have faith that Lexus will get it right. A well built V6, with well optimized turbos and a good tune, will have just as much of a smooth and likely a broader curve than than a V8, couple it with a good 8 or 10 speed Auto, which goes a long way to ensuring it feels smooth, and I don't think it will be too much of a difference. The application of TTV6's doesn't show what it is capable of as configuration as it is usually used in more performance oriented vehicles.
I don't think they would waste millions of dollar's and hundreds of thousands of man hours destroying the legendary smoothness and reliability our vehicles are known for. Definitely dont write them off just yet.
The Toyota Aristo (though it was TT Inline 6) was gloriously smooth even when driving a car 20+ years old.
The sound, thats a while different box of frogs, worlds apart but both lovely in different ways and much more a personal choice.
I don't think they would waste millions of dollar's and hundreds of thousands of man hours destroying the legendary smoothness and reliability our vehicles are known for. Definitely dont write them off just yet.
The Toyota Aristo (though it was TT Inline 6) was gloriously smooth even when driving a car 20+ years old.
The sound, thats a while different box of frogs, worlds apart but both lovely in different ways and much more a personal choice.
its obvious they shouldve just included a V8 and TTV6 version of the ls 500 rather than just a 6 cylinder
#25
Lexus Fanatic
And the V8 version is coming...
#26
Lexus Fanatic
My issue with a V6 isn't reliability, nor power - I'm confident they'll get it right....it's about the "feel" and the sound and so on. Look, they make a Mustang GT that gets almost as much performance out of their V6 version....but I would still want the 5.0.....
There's no replacement for displacement.
There's no replacement for displacement.
#27
Lexus Fanatic
I think if you drive some of these TTV6s you'd find the feel is just fine. I've come around on the engine most of the way. I'd prefer a V8, but I'm not going to pay $10,000+ for one over a TTV6.
#28
Driver
MJG87: No-one is arguing that you can't get the same level of power out of a turbocharged engine. Or that it will use less fuel than a V8 (the most likely reason Lexus has gone this route, along with BMW, Mercedes and most other manufacturers). But I'm sure all will agree that an 8 cylinder engine is smoother than a V6, turbocharged or otherwise.
As far as reliability is concerned (again taking the example to the extreme). Formula 1 teams (using 1.6L turbocharged V6, 15,000 rpm, 1000 HP engines) will go through 8 engines a season (if they even make it through the entire season with the maximum allowed 8 engines). So high power, high revving, small capacity engines do have durability limitations.
As far as reliability is concerned (again taking the example to the extreme). Formula 1 teams (using 1.6L turbocharged V6, 15,000 rpm, 1000 HP engines) will go through 8 engines a season (if they even make it through the entire season with the maximum allowed 8 engines). So high power, high revving, small capacity engines do have durability limitations.
I am not denying the V8 is great, but the V6TT will be very interesting to see and may liven Lexus up a bit, we all know it needs it.
#29
Driver School Candidate
Thread Starter
Definitely an extreme example. Anything working that hard is going to have troubles. A top fuel dragster gets rebuilt a few hundred times a year too.
I am not denying the V8 is great, but the V6TT will be very interesting to see and may liven Lexus up a bit, we all know it needs it.
I am not denying the V8 is great, but the V6TT will be very interesting to see and may liven Lexus up a bit, we all know it needs it.
my guess with the TTV6 will be 125-175k. turbos probably need replacing 125-150k depending on how hard the car was driven
#30
Driver
Not a bad guess, but we will have to wait and see obviously. Maintenance is key, you might be pleasantly surprised.