Rear leg room comparison - ClubLexus - Lexus Forum Discussion


LS - 3rd Gen (2001-2006) Discussion topics related to the flagship Lexus LS430

Rear leg room comparison

Reply
 
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-14-11, 07:41 AM   #1
skassamali
Driver
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: TX
Posts: 159
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Rear leg room comparison

According to the official reports, the 2008 MDX has about 1 inch more rear legroom than the LS, but when we went to go drive it yesterday, it definitely didn't feel like it did. And that was with my driver seat way up too. In the LS, I'm driving comfortably and there's plenty of room in the back seats (even for me at 6'2). I'm trying to use the rear leg room measurement as a gauge to determine which potential SUV would fit our 2 twin car seats comfortably while allowing me to sit in a somewhat normal position like in the LS.
skassamali is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-11, 08:36 AM   #2
aqbill
Driver School Candidate
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: AL
Posts: 31
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Indeed, the 2008 MDX may have more rear legroom than a standard 2008 LS460. However, the 2001-2006 LS430's have much more spacious rear-seat accommodations than it's little brother the LS460. The LS430 also has a much larger trunk to boot. Although I personally like the style of the LS460 better, in many respects I think the LS 430 is the better car.
aqbill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-11, 11:46 AM   #3
warminwisc
Lexus Champion
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: wi
Posts: 2,306
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

You want to se a SUV with poor legroom check out the new Ford Exploder. I rented one and what junk.
warminwisc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-11, 04:20 PM   #4
skassamali
Driver
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: TX
Posts: 159
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Check out the legroom of the EX56. I know it's not an SUV, but I can't believe it's marketed even as a crossover suv!
skassamali is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-11, 05:35 PM   #5
AlexusAnja
Moderator
 
AlexusAnja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NY/NJ
Posts: 4,171
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Like Aqbill said, maybe the '08 MDX to the LS460, but not the 430. I have both vehicles ('10 MDX and '04 LS430) and same seating position, there is sufficiently more legroom/kneeroom in my 430 than the MDX. Honestly, a lot of time I really don't know how the "legroom" is measured in vehicles because some that have "more" seem like they have less.
AlexusAnja is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LS vs GS vs IS for tall person? EcoGs21 LS - 3rd Gen (2001-2006) 13 07-11-15 01:29 PM
Finally sat in a GX460 and GX470 FrigginFGO GX - 2nd Gen (2010-present) 17 08-27-14 12:44 PM
How Tall Are You? greg0723 IS - 2nd Gen (2006-2013) 64 12-30-10 06:54 PM
Looking at 91-94 vs 95-97 any thoughts either way? Brianell LS - 1st and 2nd Gen (1990-2000) 4 03-13-09 10:39 PM
Leg Room Question carfanmd GX - 1st Gen (2004-2009) 8 11-07-07 03:47 PM


Tags
2008, 330, car, comparison, driver, leg, legroom, lexus, ls, ls430, measured, rear, room, seat, suv

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:35 PM.


Copyright © 2000-2017 Internet Brands, Inc. All Rights Reserved
 
  • Ask a Question
    Get answers from community experts
What's your question?
Send