Reliability
Rock
Again to avoid bashing and anger, I currently am very happy with my Lexus dealer in Mechanicsburg. Very professional. But batting only .333 isn't that great. The real problem is that they are 2 hours away. This is why I won't buy another Lexus, not because of 2 very poor dealership experiences and what you said (and I agree) are generally minor reliability issues.
This forum, and most like it suffer from people who work for the Large conglomerate in question writing in as if they are regular car owners. If I worked for Lexus I would not be objective either, but I might not try to give the impression that I was just like everyone else.
Nothing is black and white. Take these comments for what they are, and remember that I really do love my LS430, and Lexus as a company itself. Just a few very unfortunate dealership experiences. This does not make me the enemy Rock. It just points to areas where the company can VASTLY improve!
Fred
Mainly, the US government actually defines a luxury car as costing more than $38,000. That is when the luxury tax chimes in. A large portion of the Lexus sales volume in the USA is with the ES330 which is well below this price. I think of that vehicle as very nice, but not in the luxury ranks of many other vehicles. The other giant seller is the RX330, which is over the govt. stated range and qualifies for the luxury mark, but not by much My guess is that Rockville could provide more accurate estimates of % sales these two vehicles make up than I could, but I would guess that 70-80% of their sales are from these two.
You can't compare this to Mercedes sales record, unless the vast majority of their sales are all C-class vehicles. Again, I do not have the numbers for Mercedes (I actually don't work for a major luxury auto maker
), but you would have to compare apples with apples, and not ES330 sales with E-class sales. Mercedes used to be the luxury king until reliability and dealership problems began to hurt them. Lexus has the priviledged position to have Mercedes mistakes to learn from.
Just things to think about, not things to get upset about.
Last edited by Diesel11; Nov 6, 2005 at 09:02 AM.
Mainly, the US government actually defines a luxury car as costing more than $38,000. That is when the luxury tax chimes in. A large portion of the Lexus sales volume in the USA is with the ES330 which is well below this price. I think of that vehicle as very nice, but not in the luxury ranks of many other vehicles. The other giant seller is the RX330, which is over the govt. stated range and qualifies for the luxury mark, but not by much My guess is that Rockville could provide more accurate estimates of % sales these two vehicles make up than I could, but I would guess that 70-80% of their sales are from these two.
You can't compare this to Mercedes sales record, unless the vast majority of their sales are all C-class vehicles. Again, I do not have the numbers for Mercedes (I actually don't work for a major luxury auto maker
), but you would have to compare apples with apples, and not ES330 sales with E-class sales. Mercedes used to be the luxury king until reliability and dealership problems began to hurt them. Lexus has the priviledged position to have Mercedes mistakes to learn from.
Just things to think about, not things to get upset about.

Rock
The ratings by system in the recent Auto Preview appear to be relative ratings once again, like the overall ratings are, rather than absolute ratings based on the percentage of cars with an issue. As recently as the 2005 Auto Issue a half-black dot meant an issue rate between 9.3 and 14.8 percent.
Result of the change: for a fairly new car it is now much easier to get a half-black dot for a specific system.
At the same time, this makes the system ratings much less robust. Even with a sample size of a few hundred, it will only take a handful of people to change a rating. One or two extra bad transmissions could do it. To report system repair rates with this level of precision they need a larger sample.
I've just begun conducting what will be much more useful reliability research. To make the impact of differences in reIiability clear, I'm going to be reporting times in the shop and days in the shop. I haven't started collecting data on any Lexus model, but will as soon as I have enough of a model / model year enrolled. I don't plan to report system-level rates any time soon, because of the sample size needed.
Paint on the new cars can easily chip, the old one is solid like a rock.
Body trim is loose on the new models. I already lost the front windshield moulding, it flew away.
The sheet metal of the 90 is thicker than 02, it has more of a solid feel.
The 02 has a rattle in the dashboard which is obvious and annoying.
The 02 breaks keep squealing, the dealer thinks if I replace the breaks will fix the problem even though my current brakes have more than fifty percent.
Both are great cars but I like the 90 more, it has more personality and feels more solid.
1990 180,000 miles
2002 63,000 miles
Paint on the new cars can easily chip, the old one is solid like a rock.
Body trim is loose on the new models. I already lost the front windshield moulding, it flew away.
The sheet metal of the 90 is thicker than 02, it has more of a solid feel.
The 02 has a rattle in the dashboard which is obvious and annoying.
The 02 breaks keep squealing, the dealer thinks if I replace the breaks will fix the problem even though my current brakes have more than fifty percent.
Both are great cars but I like the 90 more, it has more personality and feels more solid.
1990 180,000 miles
2002 63,000 miles
Problem with paint and brakes is enviromental - since then, they had to start using more ecological materials (lead free paint, azbest free brakes).
Luxury vehicles can be best built, they can be the most luxurious, a lots of other things, but they can not be the most reliable. Luxury car with thousands upon thousands of features simply can not be as reliable as econo car. In Europe, in most of surveys, it is Toyota's that are most reliable and Lexus drivers that are the happiest. LS430 can never, ever be as reliable as an Yaris, but then again, Yaris does not have self closing doors :-).
As to the dealership, huge amount of attention has been given to dealerships and aftersales departments by Toyota/Lexus. I do feel that Toyota and Lexus dealers are the best out there, if you check surveys, both Lexus customers AND Lexus dealers are the happiest bunch out there.
Of course, it is all in statistics - the fact that Lexus is the most reliable brand does not mean that cars dont break. The fact that dealers are the nicest, doesnt mean some of them arent really bad.
Celebrating Lexus & Toyota from Around the Globe
Good service technicians are hard to find. When I had my Cressida, there was a tech at the dealer that was really good. Anytime I had the car in, I requested that he perform the service. I wasn't let down. He had been a Toyota mechanic privately and with the dealer for 28 years. When I got the Lex, I wanted to bring it to him. Because he was now at the Toyota dealer, the service writer discouraged my brining the car there. The tech said he could perform service but it would make waves for him there and he was not equipped to do it outside.

Back to this discussion, if warranty service through Lexus is not cutting it, go outside and find a good technician to fix it. You hate to pay for some of this warranty stuff but sometimes an outside source can fix what the air heads at dealer miss. It may cost a few $$ but then you can get back to enjoying your car.
These smaller annoyances tarnish an otherwise fine automobile. Many of what I read should be easily fixable in competent hands.
Obviously, YMMV.
Has anyone heard the expression "take it with a grain of salt?" For those who haven't, it simply means that you shouldn't believe what you hear without giving it some thought. As for Consumer Reports, I'd say to take their information with a huge BLOCK of salt... they can be a valuable source of information, but they are INCREDIBLY BIASED and give more opinion than scientific fact. The truth is they bite off more than they can chew and they do quite well all things considering. But they just don't have the ability to give truly balanced opinions that are tempered by experience and enough knowledge. I would say that if someone wants to consult Consumer Reports about a purchase they plan to make, then give them a 10% stake in your choices and find more information to get the other 90% of your impression from. I would advise that a good 50% come from your own personal experiences, as nothing can really beat that!
I've run across people who rely on CR for EVERYTHING and take them to be gospel no matter what... a very unwise choice. Maybe it's a coincidence, but the same people also seem to be mentally unstable and not very smart or able to discern the truth on their own. CR is a good source of information, but you have to be able to tell when they're giving opinion over fact. Their opinion is as good as anyone's, but they don't seem to be honest enough to tell you when it's just their opinion and they say things as if God Himself proclaimed them. Note: When I say "their opinion is as good as anybody's" I mean that you should get MANY opinions, because one opinion can often be wrong (and theirs is often very wrong and in scary ways), but getting a wide base of opinions gives you a safer foundation for making decisions.
I'll give you a quick example. They review a product each year that I am intimately familiar with. This product is actually the best made and therefore costs more than average. CR, each year can't seem to get it through their thick heads that a product you buy once and never have to replace is a far better value than one that you replace many, many times, especially when the quality product actually does what it claims to do and NONE of the other products they compare it to actually even do the job they're sold and promoted to do! To me, if I spend my money on something and it doesn't do it's job, it's worthless. To me, if that product also costs me 5 times as much in the long run, I feel very cheated. But CR takes on too many projects and can't do their homework to find out that what they are reporting is BS. This is, of course, the worst of examples for them. But it's so frustrating that they would give such strong opinions when they really don't know what they are talking about! They do people a great disservice by not simply saying "Hey from what we can tell, this is the way it is" instead of "we've covered every angle and we just KNOW this is the way is MUST BE!" They DON'T cover every angle and they really don't need to... that would be excessive for most things. We, the public, just need a little more humility on their part and a lot less arrogance! CR... if you want the last word on a subject, stick to one subject and know it well and we'll listen. But CR... if you are going to continue biting off whale size bites of a million different products, of which NO ONE could be an expert at more than two or three, then admit that you are just throwing in YOUR TWO CENTS and not the exhaustive reference manual of what to do for everybody! And CR... when it comes to cars, we all appreciate your input and you have some valuable things to consider, but it's so clear that none of you are car guys or gals and you just don't understand certain things>please admit it!
Everyone, thank you for reading MY opinions here and I hope I have given some clarity of thought to you. If you get nothing else out of this, take this with you... form YOUR opinion on the opinions of true experts (in this case mechanics and owners of the car themselves) and don't get input from one, but from many sources. In my opinion, CR is a good place to go for one of those sources and it should not be left out, but don't weigh their input in too heavily and for goodness sake DON'T make a purchase on only what they say; it's the dumbest thing you could possibly do. I guarantee you'll luck out sometimes and regret it other times; they are far from consistent!!!
Has anyone heard the expression "take it with a grain of salt?" For those who haven't, it simply means that you shouldn't believe what you hear without giving it some thought. As for Consumer Reports, I'd say to take their information with a huge BLOCK of salt... they can be a valuable source of information, but they are INCREDIBLY BIASED and give more opinion than scientific fact. The truth is they bite off more than they can chew and they do quite well all things considering. But they just don't have the ability to give truly balanced opinions that are tempered by experience and enough knowledge. I would say that if someone wants to consult Consumer Reports about a purchase they plan to make, then give them a 10% stake in your choices and find more information to get the other 90% of your impression from. I would advise that a good 50% come from your own personal experiences, as nothing can really beat that!
I've run across people who rely on CR for EVERYTHING and take them to be gospel no matter what... a very unwise choice. Maybe it's a coincidence, but the same people also seem to be mentally unstable and not very smart or able to discern the truth on their own. CR is a good source of information, but you have to be able to tell when they're giving opinion over fact. Their opinion is as good as anyone's, but they don't seem to be honest enough to tell you when it's just their opinion and they say things as if God Himself proclaimed them. Note: When I say "their opinion is as good as anybody's" I mean that you should get MANY opinions, because one opinion can often be wrong (and theirs is often very wrong and in scary ways), but getting a wide base of opinions gives you a safer foundation for making decisions.
I'll give you a quick example. They review a product each year that I am intimately familiar with. This product is actually the best made and therefore costs more than average. CR, each year can't seem to get it through their thick heads that a product you buy once and never have to replace is a far better value than one that you replace many, many times, especially when the quality product actually does what it claims to do and NONE of the other products they compare it to actually even do the job they're sold and promoted to do! To me, if I spend my money on something and it doesn't do it's job, it's worthless. To me, if that product also costs me 5 times as much in the long run, I feel very cheated. But CR takes on too many projects and can't do their homework to find out that what they are reporting is BS. This is, of course, the worst of examples for them. But it's so frustrating that they would give such strong opinions when they really don't know what they are talking about! They do people a great disservice by not simply saying "Hey from what we can tell, this is the way it is" instead of "we've covered every angle and we just KNOW this is the way is MUST BE!" They DON'T cover every angle and they really don't need to... that would be excessive for most things. We, the public, just need a little more humility on their part and a lot less arrogance! CR... if you want the last word on a subject, stick to one subject and know it well and we'll listen. But CR... if you are going to continue biting off whale size bites of a million different products, of which NO ONE could be an expert at more than two or three, then admit that you are just throwing in YOUR TWO CENTS and not the exhaustive reference manual of what to do for everybody! And CR... when it comes to cars, we all appreciate your input and you have some valuable things to consider, but it's so clear that none of you are car guys or gals and you just don't understand certain things>please admit it!
Everyone, thank you for reading MY opinions here and I hope I have given some clarity of thought to you. If you get nothing else out of this, take this with you... form YOUR opinion on the opinions of true experts (in this case mechanics and owners of the car themselves) and don't get input from one, but from many sources. In my opinion, CR is a good place to go for one of those sources and it should not be left out, but don't weigh their input in too heavily and for goodness sake DON'T make a purchase on only what they say; it's the dumbest thing you could possibly do. I guarantee you'll luck out sometimes and regret it other times; they are far from consistent!!!
Excellent post. I agree. CR is biased (so is everyone to some extent). One might argue that they are less biased because they don't take advertising money, but that is like saying the members at Club Lexus are not biased. We are.... most of us love Lexus.
My problem with CR is their methodology. They only survey their subscribers, who are not a representative sample of America. They are a small group of people who generally favor Japanesse cars. I include myself in that comment
). This is not to say subscribers are bad people, just not representative of the population. They get about a 10% response rate, thus you get a small portion of a biased sample group. Not a very scientific approach. JD Power has a slightly better approach, but ultimately the questions of reliability and durability are tough ones to answer. Ultimately there are 2 kinds of people: Those who find out the facts and then form their opinion, and those who have their opinion and find the facts to support their idea. Most of us are unfotunately in the latter group. Japanesse car lovers will find much support and positive feedback from CR. But it sure isn't the gospel.
Yes I have a couple of paint chips, but thats not the car, it's the tree huggers, and sanding trucks.
ABSOLUTLY the best and most satisfying car I have ever owned. I TRULY enjoy this car a little more every time I drive it.
Frank






