Notices
LS - 1st and 2nd Gen (1990-2000) Discussion topics related to the 1990 - 2000 Lexus LS400

1990 ls400 value

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 10, 2014 | 12:35 PM
  #1  
rjb356's Avatar
rjb356
Thread Starter
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: California
Default 1990 ls400 value

My 89 year old Mother is planning on selling her single owner 1990 LS400 with about 90,000 miles on it. Mechanically the car is very good condition as it has always been well maintained. The interior is original and in good shape. Same with the exterior, with the exception for 24 years parking lot exposure. The only item I am aware of needing repair is the dashboard LCD.

This is a first year USA LS400. There is no LS400 model designation on the exterior of the car, as it was the only model sold at that time in the USA. This car is original, with no know customization I am aware of.

I have no idea what this car is worth, so I'm asking forum members to give me an idea of how to value this automobile.

The automobile is in Southern California and has been it whole existence.

Thanks in advance for any information.

RJB
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2014 | 12:39 PM
  #2  
sha4000's Avatar
sha4000
Lexus Test Driver
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,858
Likes: 347
From: N.Y.
Default

Just use Kelly Blue Book to estimate the value or google it. I'm going to say about 2k though but I've seen them cheaper than that.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2014 | 12:49 PM
  #3  
billydpowe's Avatar
billydpowe
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,225
Likes: 174
From: texas
Default

too many built in problems in the 1990-1994 models to start from scratch, for me 1995-1997 are probably the strongest and best built of the bunch, but my appeal level is 1998-2000.... I love them... I'm sure 2001-2014 are great, but when I see one I think it appeals to women more than men.. and dont ask me why, because I really dont know, they just do (to me) .... but what ever turns you on, go for it... I dont think they ever made a bad one...ever!!
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2014 | 02:04 PM
  #4  
flipnotize's Avatar
flipnotize
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: ca
Default

Compared it to kellybluebook and edmunds with 90k on 1990 private sale "ok condition" $1,000 for a great condition $1,700 if its showroom quality then $2,000 and up. Compared to both $1,700 will do good.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2014 | 07:45 PM
  #5  
nttung1711's Avatar
nttung1711
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default

I've got 1995 ls400 for $2000 so I believe this one should less than $1500. First model may have some problems.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2014 | 09:04 PM
  #6  
Gene01's Avatar
Gene01
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 832
Likes: 8
From: CA
Default

Actually, the ES250 was sold at the same time as the 90 LS400. It's true that you could not mistake one for the other, but I don't know the reason that the 90-94 LS400 had no model identification trim.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2014 | 01:27 AM
  #7  
dicer's Avatar
dicer
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 4,525
Likes: 98
From: ca
Default

Originally Posted by billydpowe
too many built in problems in the 1990-1994 models to start from scratch, for me 1995-1997 are probably the strongest and best built of the bunch, but my appeal level is 1998-2000.... I love them... I'm sure 2001-2014 are great, but when I see one I think it appeals to women more than men.. and dont ask me why, because I really dont know, they just do (to me) .... but what ever turns you on, go for it... I dont think they ever made a bad one...ever!!
Too many problems in first gen? I thought they were the best. Don't the 95 -97's have some electrical things that can be more problematic than 90 -94's? Like the security system?
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2014 | 07:50 AM
  #8  
mappo's Avatar
mappo
Driver
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 191
Likes: 2
From: MD
Default

Originally Posted by dicer
Too many problems in first gen? I thought they were the best. Don't the 95 -97's have some electrical things that can be more problematic than 90 -94's? Like the security system?
Think of the first year model as the prototype, the car they built without the benefit of thousands of customers telling them what needed tweaking. So they got some things a bit wrong - the wheels were too small, the brakes were underpowered, the headlights were too dim, leather wasn't standard yet. Still a great car, but not as perfected as later editions.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2014 | 08:06 AM
  #9  
RugbyDad's Avatar
RugbyDad
Pole Position
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 250
Likes: 1
From: NY
Default

Originally Posted by mappo
Think of the first year model as the prototype, the car they built without the benefit of thousands of customers telling them what needed tweaking. So they got some things a bit wrong - the wheels were too small, the brakes were underpowered, the headlights were too dim, leather wasn't standard yet. Still a great car, but not as perfected as later editions.
As with all cars. Start out bad (comparatively subjective), get better to the point where the car can be considered as perfect as it will ever get (again, comparatively subjective), then realize that perfect doesn't make money and degrade product to encourage upgrading to later editions. Standard business practice across all industries EVER.

Originally Posted by dicer
Too many problems in first gen? I thought they were the best. Don't the 95 -97's have some electrical things that can be more problematic than 90 -94's? Like the security system?
They all have their quirks but the 2.5 gens are arguably the best of the ucf's. Better standard options, higher hp engine, 5 speed, etc. These benefits far outweigh the quirkiness of the 2.5's by comparison to the earlier ucf's.

Last edited by RugbyDad; Oct 11, 2014 at 08:20 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2014 | 09:35 AM
  #10  
dicer's Avatar
dicer
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 4,525
Likes: 98
From: ca
Default

Originally Posted by RugbyDad
As with all cars. Start out bad (comparatively subjective), get better to the point where the car can be considered as perfect as it will ever get (again, comparatively subjective), then realize that perfect doesn't make money and degrade product to encourage upgrading to later editions. Standard business practice across all industries EVER.



They all have their quirks but the 2.5 gens are arguably the best of the ucf's. Better standard options, higher hp engine, 5 speed, etc. These benefits far outweigh the quirkiness of the 2.5's by comparison to the earlier ucf's.
Then there is the interference engine after what, 94?

As far as value for the 90, the good thing is the miles big selling point. But personally I would rather a pristine factory paint job and body, interior etc. than the low miles. Paint and body are the most difficult things to fix correctly. And you can only have a factory paint job once. Power train is the easy fix, even lots of nonmechanics seem to get some problems sorted out. Paint and body is an art.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2014 | 12:36 PM
  #11  
ExiledWolf84's Avatar
ExiledWolf84
Racer
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,402
Likes: 117
From: Colorado
Default

I do like how the first gen's did not have the LS400 badge. It was THE Lexus, nuff said.

I still would like to have a 5-speed ES250 though, those are sharp!
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2014 | 08:15 PM
  #12  
sha4000's Avatar
sha4000
Lexus Test Driver
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,858
Likes: 347
From: N.Y.
Default

Originally Posted by YoshiMan
I do like how the first gen's did not have the LS400 badge. It was THE Lexus, nuff said.

I still would like to have a 5-speed ES250 though, those are sharp!
I thought the ES250 was such an ugly car and should not even be in the Lexus line up. I'm glad they discountinued it.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2014 | 12:34 AM
  #13  
UNCNOR's Avatar
UNCNOR
Pole Position
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 344
Likes: 7
From: Florida
Default

Originally Posted by YoshiMan
I do like how the first gen's did not have the LS400 badge. It was THE Lexus, nuff said.

I still would like to have a 5-speed ES250 though, those are sharp!
My first Lexus was the ES250,a 1991 to be exact.Ordered it at the end of 1990 from Seattle Lexus.It turned out to be a "special order" because I ordered the five speed MANUAL transmission.My Dad thought I was crazy.Loved that car but it died on black ice in Colorado.Wish I still had it.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
marklfarkl
LS - 1st and 2nd Gen (1990-2000)
15
Nov 7, 2019 09:37 AM
R0ckworthy
LS - 1st and 2nd Gen (1990-2000)
13
Jan 23, 2011 08:07 PM
azari
LS - 1st and 2nd Gen (1990-2000)
6
Jun 29, 2003 07:54 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:37 AM.