LS - 1st and 2nd Gen (1990-2000) Discussion topics related to the 1990 - 2000 Lexus LS400

1990 ls400 value

Old 10-10-14, 12:35 PM
  #1  
rjb356
Driver School Candidate
Thread Starter
 
rjb356's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: California
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 1990 ls400 value

My 89 year old Mother is planning on selling her single owner 1990 LS400 with about 90,000 miles on it. Mechanically the car is very good condition as it has always been well maintained. The interior is original and in good shape. Same with the exterior, with the exception for 24 years parking lot exposure. The only item I am aware of needing repair is the dashboard LCD.

This is a first year USA LS400. There is no LS400 model designation on the exterior of the car, as it was the only model sold at that time in the USA. This car is original, with no know customization I am aware of.

I have no idea what this car is worth, so I'm asking forum members to give me an idea of how to value this automobile.

The automobile is in Southern California and has been it whole existence.

Thanks in advance for any information.

RJB
Old 10-10-14, 12:39 PM
  #2  
sha4000
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (1)
 
sha4000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: N.Y.
Posts: 6,853
Received 334 Likes on 288 Posts
Default

Just use Kelly Blue Book to estimate the value or google it. I'm going to say about 2k though but I've seen them cheaper than that.
Old 10-10-14, 12:49 PM
  #3  
billydpowe
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (1)
 
billydpowe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: texas
Posts: 3,225
Received 172 Likes on 130 Posts
Default

too many built in problems in the 1990-1994 models to start from scratch, for me 1995-1997 are probably the strongest and best built of the bunch, but my appeal level is 1998-2000.... I love them... I'm sure 2001-2014 are great, but when I see one I think it appeals to women more than men.. and dont ask me why, because I really dont know, they just do (to me) .... but what ever turns you on, go for it... I dont think they ever made a bad one...ever!!
Old 10-10-14, 02:04 PM
  #4  
flipnotize
Driver School Candidate
 
flipnotize's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: ca
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Compared it to kellybluebook and edmunds with 90k on 1990 private sale "ok condition" $1,000 for a great condition $1,700 if its showroom quality then $2,000 and up. Compared to both $1,700 will do good.
Old 10-10-14, 07:45 PM
  #5  
nttung1711
Driver School Candidate
 
nttung1711's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: CA
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I've got 1995 ls400 for $2000 so I believe this one should less than $1500. First model may have some problems.
Old 10-10-14, 09:04 PM
  #6  
Gene01
Lexus Test Driver
 
Gene01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: CA
Posts: 832
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Actually, the ES250 was sold at the same time as the 90 LS400. It's true that you could not mistake one for the other, but I don't know the reason that the 90-94 LS400 had no model identification trim.
Old 10-11-14, 01:27 AM
  #7  
dicer
Lead Lap
 
dicer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: ca
Posts: 4,525
Received 97 Likes on 89 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by billydpowe
too many built in problems in the 1990-1994 models to start from scratch, for me 1995-1997 are probably the strongest and best built of the bunch, but my appeal level is 1998-2000.... I love them... I'm sure 2001-2014 are great, but when I see one I think it appeals to women more than men.. and dont ask me why, because I really dont know, they just do (to me) .... but what ever turns you on, go for it... I dont think they ever made a bad one...ever!!
Too many problems in first gen? I thought they were the best. Don't the 95 -97's have some electrical things that can be more problematic than 90 -94's? Like the security system?
Old 10-11-14, 07:50 AM
  #8  
mappo
Driver
 
mappo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: MD
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dicer
Too many problems in first gen? I thought they were the best. Don't the 95 -97's have some electrical things that can be more problematic than 90 -94's? Like the security system?
Think of the first year model as the prototype, the car they built without the benefit of thousands of customers telling them what needed tweaking. So they got some things a bit wrong - the wheels were too small, the brakes were underpowered, the headlights were too dim, leather wasn't standard yet. Still a great car, but not as perfected as later editions.
Old 10-11-14, 08:06 AM
  #9  
RugbyDad
Pole Position
 
RugbyDad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: NY
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by mappo
Think of the first year model as the prototype, the car they built without the benefit of thousands of customers telling them what needed tweaking. So they got some things a bit wrong - the wheels were too small, the brakes were underpowered, the headlights were too dim, leather wasn't standard yet. Still a great car, but not as perfected as later editions.
As with all cars. Start out bad (comparatively subjective), get better to the point where the car can be considered as perfect as it will ever get (again, comparatively subjective), then realize that perfect doesn't make money and degrade product to encourage upgrading to later editions. Standard business practice across all industries EVER.

Originally Posted by dicer
Too many problems in first gen? I thought they were the best. Don't the 95 -97's have some electrical things that can be more problematic than 90 -94's? Like the security system?
They all have their quirks but the 2.5 gens are arguably the best of the ucf's. Better standard options, higher hp engine, 5 speed, etc. These benefits far outweigh the quirkiness of the 2.5's by comparison to the earlier ucf's.

Last edited by RugbyDad; 10-11-14 at 08:20 AM.
Old 10-11-14, 09:35 AM
  #10  
dicer
Lead Lap
 
dicer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: ca
Posts: 4,525
Received 97 Likes on 89 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RugbyDad
As with all cars. Start out bad (comparatively subjective), get better to the point where the car can be considered as perfect as it will ever get (again, comparatively subjective), then realize that perfect doesn't make money and degrade product to encourage upgrading to later editions. Standard business practice across all industries EVER.



They all have their quirks but the 2.5 gens are arguably the best of the ucf's. Better standard options, higher hp engine, 5 speed, etc. These benefits far outweigh the quirkiness of the 2.5's by comparison to the earlier ucf's.
Then there is the interference engine after what, 94?

As far as value for the 90, the good thing is the miles big selling point. But personally I would rather a pristine factory paint job and body, interior etc. than the low miles. Paint and body are the most difficult things to fix correctly. And you can only have a factory paint job once. Power train is the easy fix, even lots of nonmechanics seem to get some problems sorted out. Paint and body is an art.
Old 10-11-14, 12:36 PM
  #11  
YoshiMan
Racer
 
YoshiMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,321
Received 92 Likes on 84 Posts
Default

I do like how the first gen's did not have the LS400 badge. It was THE Lexus, nuff said.

I still would like to have a 5-speed ES250 though, those are sharp!
Old 10-11-14, 08:15 PM
  #12  
sha4000
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (1)
 
sha4000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: N.Y.
Posts: 6,853
Received 334 Likes on 288 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by YoshiMan
I do like how the first gen's did not have the LS400 badge. It was THE Lexus, nuff said.

I still would like to have a 5-speed ES250 though, those are sharp!
I thought the ES250 was such an ugly car and should not even be in the Lexus line up. I'm glad they discountinued it.
Old 10-12-14, 12:34 AM
  #13  
UNCNOR
Pole Position
iTrader: (1)
 
UNCNOR's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Florida
Posts: 344
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by YoshiMan
I do like how the first gen's did not have the LS400 badge. It was THE Lexus, nuff said.

I still would like to have a 5-speed ES250 though, those are sharp!
My first Lexus was the ES250,a 1991 to be exact.Ordered it at the end of 1990 from Seattle Lexus.It turned out to be a "special order" because I ordered the five speed MANUAL transmission.My Dad thought I was crazy.Loved that car but it died on black ice in Colorado.Wish I still had it.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
marklfarkl
LS - 1st and 2nd Gen (1990-2000)
15
11-07-19 09:37 AM
R0ckworthy
LS - 1st and 2nd Gen (1990-2000)
13
01-23-11 08:07 PM
azari
LS - 1st and 2nd Gen (1990-2000)
6
06-29-03 07:54 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: 1990 ls400 value



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:05 PM.