which one would you get or both?

 

How "crazy" is the DSP unit? It's very easy to get lost in the settings. With the better DSP units you'll have time alignment, a choice of parametric eq or graphic eq and possibly crossover settings.

Simple way - 30 band graphic EQ. More complex - parametric eq. Even more complex - DSP.

But, as Retro and so many of the guys on the board have mentioned, get the installation right first. No amount of DSP can "bandaid" fix a bad install.

Percy

 

I'd agree that no amount of DSP can "bandaid" fix a bad install, however, an EQ can help to fill in the voids created by the cabin design of the vehicle.

Do the install first, and if you notice any gaps in frequencies (not with an RTA...but by ear) then I'd get an EQ.

A DSP is more of a toy/luxury...

Tim

 

i already have a sound system in my car. its very nice and clear. i'm just rebuillding my box in my trunk for a more cleaner look and design. while i'm redoing my trunk i thought it be fun to get a DSP. i have an eclipse headunit and plan on getting the eclipse dsp model 2301.

 

Any links to this processor? Would like to take a look-see...

Percy

 

click on dsp. there is only 1

http://www.eclipse-web.com/products/pdf/index.html

 

There are a couple of things that make me cautious about the DSP unit. First thing is "greater than 80db" for the signal to noise ratio. This isn't what I would call a really good number. Mid 90's is what I would consider average. Also the channel seperation isn't listed. A 7 band equalizer is VERY coarse for adjustments - I'd recommend at least a 30 band for any serious system.

You'll lose a bit of clarity and detail if you hook it up to this DSP. Save the bucks for something else!

Percy

 

thanks percy for the advice. i'm planning to get the alpine cva-1006 hopefully.