tires on an LC
I noticed both you and OutlawTita did not up the rear tires to maintain the factory ratio.
Does anyone in the Group know Lexus' position on tire size increases and F->R ratios. (mainly for warranty issues).
This is what I got off of AI:
It is important to maintain the proper front-to-back size ratio on your Lexus LC 500, especially because it is a rear-wheel-drive performance car. The LC 500 comes with a staggered tire setup (wider tires at the rear than the front) to optimize handling, traction, and stability. Changing the front-to-rear ratio of tire sizes could affect the car's handling dynamics, traction control, and stability systems.
Keeping the same front-to-back ratio is crucial for several reasons:
1. Handling and Stability: The Lexus LC 500's suspension and handling characteristics are designed for specific tire widths. Changing the ratio might affect how the car behaves during turns, acceleration, and braking, potentially leading to understeer or oversteer.
2. Traction Control and ABS: These systems rely on consistent tire sizes and rotations per minute (RPM). If the front and rear tires' sizes differ, it could confuse these systems, leading to issues in performance or safety.
3. Differential Wear: A mismatched front-to-back ratio can place additional strain on the differential, especially in a performance vehicle like the LC 500, which can lead to premature wear or even damage.
If you must increase tire size, it's best to proportionally increase both the front and rear tire sizes while maintaining the original staggered setup.
Does anyone know if Lexus gives us any leeway on tire size and/or F->Rratio that they've put in writing (eg., in a manual, service bulletin, etc) to protect us from L's refusal of a warranty claim down the road? . . . (Can you tell I'm a retired attorney? :>
Does anyone in the Group know Lexus' position on tire size increases and F->R ratios. (mainly for warranty issues).
This is what I got off of AI:
It is important to maintain the proper front-to-back size ratio on your Lexus LC 500, especially because it is a rear-wheel-drive performance car. The LC 500 comes with a staggered tire setup (wider tires at the rear than the front) to optimize handling, traction, and stability. Changing the front-to-rear ratio of tire sizes could affect the car's handling dynamics, traction control, and stability systems.
Keeping the same front-to-back ratio is crucial for several reasons:
1. Handling and Stability: The Lexus LC 500's suspension and handling characteristics are designed for specific tire widths. Changing the ratio might affect how the car behaves during turns, acceleration, and braking, potentially leading to understeer or oversteer.
2. Traction Control and ABS: These systems rely on consistent tire sizes and rotations per minute (RPM). If the front and rear tires' sizes differ, it could confuse these systems, leading to issues in performance or safety.
3. Differential Wear: A mismatched front-to-back ratio can place additional strain on the differential, especially in a performance vehicle like the LC 500, which can lead to premature wear or even damage.
If you must increase tire size, it's best to proportionally increase both the front and rear tire sizes while maintaining the original staggered setup.
Does anyone know if Lexus gives us any leeway on tire size and/or F->Rratio that they've put in writing (eg., in a manual, service bulletin, etc) to protect us from L's refusal of a warranty claim down the road? . . . (Can you tell I'm a retired attorney? :>

I didn't upsize the rear tires because of ignorance. I am supposed to change tomorrow so it is not too late to go with 285/35/21 rears. I appreciate your feedback and will check into that before proceeding.
That's exactly what they told me at Discount Tire. They also mentioned that if I am not tracking the car that 275/35 and 285/35 would be a nominal difference that I wouldn't notice which I am sure is accurate.
I was going to stay out of this thread - But here goes:
It is my opinion that the Wheels on the LC are at least ½" too narrow front and back. The wheels (though 19") on the Lexus GSF and the RCF are both ½" wider than the LC. The OEM front tires supplied with the GSF and RCF are one size larger in cross-section.
Also, again, IMHO, the offset on the LC is wrong, too far inset.
I have corrected these issues with after-market wheels and up-sized tires. The changes I have made make my LC more nimble, and handling is improved
It is my opinion that the Wheels on the LC are at least ½" too narrow front and back. The wheels (though 19") on the Lexus GSF and the RCF are both ½" wider than the LC. The OEM front tires supplied with the GSF and RCF are one size larger in cross-section.
Also, again, IMHO, the offset on the LC is wrong, too far inset.
I have corrected these issues with after-market wheels and up-sized tires. The changes I have made make my LC more nimble, and handling is improved

Last edited by doncoughlinjd; Oct 15, 2024 at 03:21 PM.
It has nothing to do with size other than trying to find an All Season tire. I had to go from 245/40/21 on the front to 255/40/21 to get an All Season tire to replace the OEM summer tires. The Lexus engineers put tires on my car that won't function as intended in temperatures under 45 degrees which makes them totally unsafe for me about 5 months of the year.
the dealer will not approve any other size than whats stated...too much liability.. UR whipping a dead horse,,,do what U want..
I have been looking to do the all season tire switch as well, since I am just a grand touring driver less concerned with super tight handing. Plus, living in a 4 season area, it still is fun to drive a convertible when roads are clear and it is just cold out (especially since my LC touring option included a winter heating package bundled in). I still wonder why they default add a winter driving package in the touring package, then they swap out the base 20" wheels and tires (that you can easily replace the summer tires with all season's if you wanted to), with 21" wheels and summer tires that have no all season equivalents. That is a conundrum I can't reconcile. I can't imagine that the engineers said: "Hmm, let's add a touring package option that makes this car really warm and comfortable for winter driving, and at the same time upgrade the wheels and tires to those that can't be driven if the temperatures are under 45 degrees." 
It seems that only choice I can find with keeping the stock 21" wheels is to give up run flats, get an flat tire emergency kit for the trunk then go with upsized 255/40/21 all seasons on the on the front and keep the rear at 275/35/21. I would have preferred to go with 255/40/21 on the front and 285/35/21 on the rear, as it seems to be a better match to the ratios on the stock 21" factory configuration, but I can't find 285/35/21's all seasons. Moving to 255/40/21 on the front and 295/35/21 on the rear looks like a good combo too to keep similar to stock 21" ratios, but I think that the 295 tire width would be a bit too wide on the stock rims, so that option is out while keeping the stock rims on the car. If I wanted to replace stock rims and with a wider aftermarket 21" diameter rear wheel, then larger all seasons with a similar front to rear overall relationship seems possible
The only other option is to buy a set of 20" wheels for winter, and choose from a much larger selection of all season tire options in the stock factory sizes of 245/45/20 and 275/40/20. The lowest cost path (with a proper speed rated quality all season tire) seems to be to get the Michelin A/S4 non-run flats in the upsized front and stock sized rears for around $1700 or so. Buying new 20" rims, with TPMS sensors, and tires will run much more, plus probably not look a good in the wheel wells, and just be a pain in the neck to store and swap out every fall and spring. So 255/40/21 and 275/35/21 it will likely be (unless someone has figured out a better option on the stock 21" wheels).

It seems that only choice I can find with keeping the stock 21" wheels is to give up run flats, get an flat tire emergency kit for the trunk then go with upsized 255/40/21 all seasons on the on the front and keep the rear at 275/35/21. I would have preferred to go with 255/40/21 on the front and 285/35/21 on the rear, as it seems to be a better match to the ratios on the stock 21" factory configuration, but I can't find 285/35/21's all seasons. Moving to 255/40/21 on the front and 295/35/21 on the rear looks like a good combo too to keep similar to stock 21" ratios, but I think that the 295 tire width would be a bit too wide on the stock rims, so that option is out while keeping the stock rims on the car. If I wanted to replace stock rims and with a wider aftermarket 21" diameter rear wheel, then larger all seasons with a similar front to rear overall relationship seems possible
The only other option is to buy a set of 20" wheels for winter, and choose from a much larger selection of all season tire options in the stock factory sizes of 245/45/20 and 275/40/20. The lowest cost path (with a proper speed rated quality all season tire) seems to be to get the Michelin A/S4 non-run flats in the upsized front and stock sized rears for around $1700 or so. Buying new 20" rims, with TPMS sensors, and tires will run much more, plus probably not look a good in the wheel wells, and just be a pain in the neck to store and swap out every fall and spring. So 255/40/21 and 275/35/21 it will likely be (unless someone has figured out a better option on the stock 21" wheels).
Last edited by SecondTimeAround; Oct 16, 2024 at 09:14 AM.
This is my dilemma for my LC as well. I’m getting a headache looking and probably end up trickle charging it through the winter.
Im leaning toward a separate winter wheel package with the 20” rim but trying to confirm the wheels will be mounted okay using the lug bolts.
Im leaning toward a separate winter wheel package with the 20” rim but trying to confirm the wheels will be mounted okay using the lug bolts.









