ISF vs _________ thread
If he is he needs to know a muffler delete doesn’t add power so it would be as if he listed (interior white LEDs) as a mod. The tune doesn’t do much if anything at all unless your FBO. Only mod he would pick something up from is the car delete but didn’t list it all 4 or just 2 of them. FBO/tune ISF would have won badly.
If he is he needs to know a muffler delete doesn’t add power so it would be as if he listed (interior white LEDs) as a mod. The tune doesn’t do much if anything at all unless your FBO. Only mod he would pick something up from is the car delete but didn’t list it all 4 or just 2 of them. FBO/tune ISF would have won badly.
Last edited by LexusfanVA; Aug 28, 2019 at 05:18 PM.
Disagree. I felt a nice difference with the tune without headers, a larger difference than just catback, and with slightly better tires I dropped from a 12.7 at 112, to a 12.3 at 115. Only other mod was Borla. Muffler delete is less weight and removes the main clog of the catback. Also, video was kind of lame as far as clear road runs.
Eh, there’s people stock and people with exhausts getting 12.7 or 12.6 lowest. Tune brought me down a good bit and I love it.
The times are relative. DA, temps, wind, etc all play a huge part in quarter mile times. I can get my FBO/tune ISF run stock times under horrible conditions. The tune absolutely makes a huge difference with RR racing’s Intake and showed at the track racing other FBO no tune ISF’s at the track.
The times are relative. DA, temps, wind, etc all play a huge part in quarter mile times. I can get my FBO/tune ISF run stock times under horrible conditions. The tune absolutely makes a huge difference with RR racing’s Intake and showed at the track racing other FBO no tune ISF’s at the track.
Trending Topics
You seem defensive. I’m saying my car on the same track in similar conditions with slightly different mods showed a clear improvement and some of the best times possible for those combinations of mods. Funny enough RR has said their intake has less effect on power without headers, so with stock manifold a tune and catback alone is really all you need to max out. Point is muffler delete and tune may be minor, but they’re improvements nonetheless. All I’m saying.
If he were full bolt on, then he could have had a max of another 30-40 hp (that’s assuming he has stock cats in headers). That would have maybe put them around even. 30-40 hp is a big change, but it’s not night and day, and less than 10%.
Regardless, that Supra is fast.
Regardless, that Supra is fast.
If he is he needs to know a muffler delete doesn’t add power so it would be as if he listed (interior white LEDs) as a mod. The tune doesn’t do much if anything at all unless your FBO. Only mod he would pick something up from is the car delete but didn’t list it all 4 or just 2 of them. FBO/tune ISF would have won badly.
You’ve clearly never seen a stock ISF run a FBO one. If you think a FBO ISF would barely beat him then you’ve never seen one, raced one or even been in one. As far as mods go I “LoL” at people who do a muffler delete while the entire exhaust is still stock piping and think they gain anything from that.
You’ve clearly never seen a stock ISF run a FBO one. If you think a FBO ISF would barely beat him then you’ve never seen one, raced one or even been in one. As far as mods go I “LoL” at people who do a muffler delete while the entire exhaust is still stock piping and think they gain anything from that.
for the record I owned a 2011 isf for 3 years and went from bone stock to intake/ppe headers/ borla exhaust/bushings etc.. my qm time went from 12.9@almost 111 to 12.5@116. I wasn't tuned because I bought my grr before they came out with it but the supra is on par if not faster than fbo imo.
Last edited by ISFpowered; Aug 30, 2019 at 04:45 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post








