Notices
IS - 2nd Gen (2006-2013) Discussion about the 2006+ model IS models

Offset difference: 19s vs 20s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 18, 2007 | 08:10 AM
  #1  
bwoodwrd1's Avatar
bwoodwrd1
Thread Starter
Rookie
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default Offset difference: 19s vs 20s

I seem to remember someone once saying that the larger the wheel, the less aggressive of an offset you can run. I am assuming it would be minimal, but if a 19x9.5 et35 is a nearly perfect offset for the rear, would a 20x9.5 et 35 be too much. Either way, would running a 265 in the rear reduce the chance of rubbing (noticed many people are starting to go with 275s)

Brandon
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2007 | 08:44 AM
  #2  
neova's Avatar
neova
Pole Position
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
From: Ontario, Canada
Default

That is NOT a rule.

If you want to retain the same overall wheel/tire diameter as stock, as you increase the wheel diameter, you decrease the sidewall height. However, it is often impossible or impractical go with a tire with thinner sidewalls so most of the time using a larger wheel will result in using a tire that would cause an overall increase in diameter for the wheel/tire. So there is an IMPLIED relationship that as you increase wheel diameter, you will need to compensate the clearance issues by using higher wheel offsets.

Increasing the overall diameter of the wheel/tire combo reduces the amount of fender gap, therefore reducing tire/fender clearance and requires you to push the wheels in a bit more via higher offsets (but keeping in mind you need to clear the suspension components too!). This is assuming you are not changing the suspension height and only having 1 driver as the load under normal driving conditions (if you're auto crossing your car then you'll be compressing your suspension more which requires more fender clearance!).

If you're planning to use 265/30R19 on 19x9.5 ET35 it should fit the rear no problems on stock height with 1 driver (if you lower your car then you might need to use higher offsets and/or narrower tire like 255/30R19 where the wider wheel would stretch the sidewall a bit more thus producing a shorter overall sidewall height). If you're using 265/30R20 on 20x9.5 ET35 it would be 1" taller than he 19" combo and you have 0.5" less fender gap clearance which may cause rubbing. You would either have to consider a higher offset for the 20x9.5" or use a shorter tire like 265/25R20 or 275/25R20 assuming that these tire specs exists.

As you can see, suspension ride height (includes static height and compression under load which influences the amount of negative camber), wheel width, wheel offset, tire width, tire side wall height, are all factors contributing to whether a wheel/tire combo would fit/rub.

For 19x9.5" application for the rear, i would recommend ET40 with a 255/30R19 tire. This is a conservative setup and depending on your suspension mods/passenger load you can play with the offset and tire sizes (which also varies from different makes & models) accordingly.

confusing enough? yes. But when speaking about which tire/combo fits we need to consider ALL of these factors otherwise it can be misleading

Last edited by neova; Jul 18, 2007 at 09:12 AM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Insedanity
LS - 3rd Gen (2001-2006)
11
Jun 16, 2016 10:27 AM
aldo23
Wheels, Tires & Brakes Forum
29
May 6, 2010 05:38 AM
Tensi
SC430 - 2nd Gen (2001-2010)
15
Apr 17, 2009 02:07 PM
MrMark
IS - 2nd Gen (2006-2013)
1
Jul 19, 2006 05:50 PM
tinygs
Wheels, Tires & Brakes Forum
20
Sep 28, 2002 10:55 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:44 PM.