Can anyone tell me first hand the difference in quality between the stock and the ML sound systems. I doubt that I will ever sit and watch a DVD in my car (wouldn't do it while driving either), so unless there are other features provided by the ML system it seems to come down to sound quality.

Basically I want to know if it is worth waiting 4 months for (since I'd have to order a car to get the ML system)....

 

If you have listened to high quality audio in your home, then I think you will notice the difference in the ML system. With good source material the sound is extraordinary with solid bass and without the boominess you normally hear from an average car system. And if you ever try a DVD-Audio disc the surround sound will blow you away. Try the 'Pictures at an Exhibition' DVD-A and the cost will be worth it. To me it's worth the wait. When integrated with the Nav system it makes it very easy to work with the audio system. But since I have not actually listened to a non-ML system I can't state how close the systems are. But isn't a Lexus worth the extra cost for a top grade system? I think the cost of the ML system is worth it. I doubt you could spend $1,000 and get better sound.

There is a thread here that goes into a lot of detail on the two systems. Do a search and all will be revealed.

 

I have heard both and really the MAJOR difference is the DVD player. Playing MP3s and WMAs in both really didn't have much difference. I think the ML might have abit more wattage and maybe an additional speaker (don't kill me on this!).. But I didn't find it that big of a change. It's not like going from Kenwood to Bose or Infinity to Klipsch.

 

IMO, definately worth every penny, and worth the 4 month wait.

In simple terms, the quality of sound is much more refined and crisp with the ML System. There is a clear definate difference in sound quality between the two, and if you are a music afficianado, I highly suggest you consider it.

 

I've never heard the ML system in the IS, as they aren't sold (except by special order) in the Northeast, but the difference between the stock system and the ML system in the GS430 I drove was night-and-day. I regret not ordering (or finding in a different state) an IS equipped with ML.

 

I should have stated that my source for music will usually be radio (FM or XM) and MP3s. I doubt that I'd ever buy a DVD-A.

 

Most XM souce is excellent quality so I still think you'd enjoy the ML system with XM. I listen to many stations on XM and when the original source is good quality the system really shines with amazing clarity and solid bass. I was quite surprised on how good the XM music is .... it's as good as a CD in most cases.

 

I'll agree with that statement. The XM sound quality was much better than I had anticipated.
I think the ML system can be the added difference.

 

yup the mark levinson system is comparable to a mid level after market system...if not better. The sound is crisp and clear, there is really no need to replace any of the speakers. The only thing you would even consider upgrading is the sub. Which is still pretty nice for a small sedan.

 

if you get the ML do you have to get the XM package as well?

 

No.
You can chose Sirus, XM, or NONE.

 

Nope......

 

no...but it does cost a hefty penny.

 

I usually listen to more Cd's than anything but I would want the ML package so that's why I asked....

Nova what do you mean?

 

how much does it cost to get XM on a IS 250? If I remember it's like $4XX on toyotas.