When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Hybrid TechnologyUnique topics related to the 2023 up RX model hybrid drivetrain and other features/options found only on the hybrid models. Please use the main forum for discussion about shared components with other fifth generation RX models.
I know this is a great debate topic but has anyone actually tried running on 91 versus 87 and noticed any measurable difference in MPG? I plan to run it on 87 if there is only a 1-2 mpg hit on the efficiency. I have 400 miles on the odometer and am still on the original tank the dealer provided which I understand to be 87 based on what I read here. At this time I'm not quite hitting the 37 mpg city mark yet but its a new engine that needs to be broken in I presume. Thanks in advance, this will help me avoid having to do my own experiment.
Originally Posted by jahnjva
I have never tried 91, only 87 and I'm averaging over 40 MPG so there is no need to bother with the 91 esp with the 15-20% additional cost on 91.
Are you guys really getting that kind of mileage on your 23 350h? I wonder what I'm doing wrong. I'm getting between 33 and 34.5 with 970 miles on the car. I know it needs to break in but so do yours. I hope it will get better. And I'm burning premium. I wonder if I would do better with 87...
Try figuring the miles by calculations and compare it to the computer reading. I have seen the computer be off by 1-2 MPG. Also make sure you are clearing the full MPG history, not just the current tank. If you don't the car will take the average from day 1 and that would lower the #. Also keep the car in ECO mode all the time.
Try figuring the miles by calculations and compare it to the computer reading. I have seen the computer be off by 1-2 MPG. Also make sure you are clearing the full MPG history, not just the current tank. If you don't the car will take the average from day 1 and that would lower the #. Also keep the car in ECO mode all the time.
My calculations of 33 to 34.5 are based on 2 tank refills, since I've owned it, where I topped off the tank as full as possible to guarantee that I was as close as possible to comparing apples to apples. And, I divide my trip miles A&B by the gallons on my receipt. I know not to trust the readings on the car. I drive in ECO mostly and occasionally I even push the EV Mode button on the console. I run it until the battery shuts it down. I will have the dealer look at it when I take it in for 1,000 mile oil and filter change. In the end I will live with whatever it is. 33 MPG is not bad, it's just not what it should be.
Are you guys really getting that kind of mileage on your 23 350h? I wonder what I'm doing wrong. I'm getting between 33 and 34.5 with 970 miles on the car. I know it needs to break in but so do yours. I hope it will get better. And I'm burning premium. I wonder if I would do better with 87...
Driving conditions have a tremendous amount to do with this. During the winter in coastal NC, my average was 37-38. Now that I am in the mountains, it is 33-35. I don’t think 33-34 is bad at all.
I also don’t know how you can accurately compare the different octane levels. One day the same trip you take may include no stops at red lights, the next day it may include ten stops at red lights, along with several other variables you can’t control. I don’t think there is anyway the additional money you spend on higher octane fuel will yield a better cost per mile.
Try it. Go on several short trips so that the system never warms up (keep it down to 1-2 bars), but space the trips out so that the engine cools down to one bar each time. You'll probably average below 20 mpg. I did it when I rented a Gen II Prius long term and averaged 19 mpg. It's one of the advantages of going diesel since diesels deliver hybrid-like fuel economy immediately.
It's a problem I run into with my 350h. I go back and forth to work (4 miles) and it will only get 25-28 mpg. It warms up 1-2 miles in, but those first couple of cold miles are 15-20 mpg, followed by a couple of warm 35-37 mpg miles.
Most cars are rated city/highway. Hybrids should be rated cold/hot in my opinion.
I am still frustrated with my overall MPG. Driving in ECO like a grandma. Still about 31 in 70% local and 30% highway driving. Tried both premium and regular gas.
I am still frustrated with my overall MPG. Driving in ECO like a grandma. Still about 31 in 70% local and 30% highway driving. Tried both premium and regular gas.
Well I'm right there with you. I filled up today with 397 miles on the trip odo and it took 12.13 gallons to fill it up. Math tells us that is 32.7 MPG. Also a combo of city/highway driving, but probably only 20% highway. Now granted, I know I'm driving a 5700 pound car that is 192 inches long. That kind of MPG on a car that big was unheard of for most of my life. But Lexus claims I should be getting 34 to 37. And I read posts on here of folks getting several miles per gallon more than I am. I am taking the car in next week to have it serviced with only 1055 miles on the odo. I'll ask them what they think about it.
Well I'm right there with you. I filled up today with 397 miles on the trip odo and it took 12.13 gallons to fill it up. Math tells us that is 32.7 MPG. Also a combo of city/highway driving, but probably only 20% highway. Now granted, I know I'm driving a 5700 pound car that is 192 inches long. That kind of MPG on a car that big was unheard of for most of my life. But Lexus claims I should be getting 34 to 37. And I read posts on here of folks getting several miles per gallon more than I am. I am taking the car in next week to have it serviced with only 1055 miles on the odo. I'll ask them what they think about it.
32.7 on a 34 MPG sticker estimate seems pretty good to me. Similar, but almost double, my old 2020RX with a 19 sticker that got 17.
What’s the frustration? And it should get better after break in.
Toyota and Lexus Join Mille Miglia For The First Time
Slideshow: A five-car lineup spanning more than five decades of Toyota performance and engineering will tackle one of Italy's most celebrated automotive routes.