any dyno to verify the numbers
I haven't seen any dyno numbers, but many of the board regulars must have 'em. I'd be interested to see, also.
Don't forget that the factory numbers are at the flywheel. Rear wheel power will be less. I think that the typical correction for RWHP is about 15%. Therefore, if a motor puts out 300 HP at the flywheel, it should register about 255 RWHP. I also think that dynos factor in a correction for altitude and weather, but I'm not sure on that one.
I do not know the correction for RW torque.
Don't forget that the factory numbers are at the flywheel. Rear wheel power will be less. I think that the typical correction for RWHP is about 15%. Therefore, if a motor puts out 300 HP at the flywheel, it should register about 255 RWHP. I also think that dynos factor in a correction for altitude and weather, but I'm not sure on that one.
I do not know the correction for RW torque.
Go to www.swiftracing.com and check out his dyno pics.
Mo did a before and after so you could see the power gained by the HFI/ECU .
Mo did a before and after so you could see the power gained by the HFI/ECU .
Trending Topics
Biggie - The word I get from my RMM salesman is that their valve body is designed to firm up the shifts & increase the fluid pressure somewhat so there's a chance that it might increase the tranny efficiency. Been waiting on Mo's ECU myself because it allows for some programmability ( I have the RMM gears ) but don't know the latest on it's development?
FWIW - MY driveline losses have averaged 20% based on all the dyno data I've accumulated. It's the same WinPep DynoJet 1200 HP rearwheel dyno that Mo uses, I think - I know these lossses will vary from car to car as well.
FWIW - MY driveline losses have averaged 20% based on all the dyno data I've accumulated. It's the same WinPep DynoJet 1200 HP rearwheel dyno that Mo uses, I think - I know these lossses will vary from car to car as well.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
juanmedina
IS F (2008-2014)
21
Mar 30, 2016 04:20 AM




