|
I think a more neutral color would age much better. |
Originally Posted by SW17LS
(Post 10419613)
The color of the wood depends on the year. Pre-refresh 02-04 cars had the reddish wood with any of the three interior colors, black, grey or tan. Post refresh 05-06 cars had the blond birds eye maple with the grey or tan interior and kept the red for the black. Both look dated now.
|
Originally Posted by mmarshall
(Post 10419630)
I'd take ether of those two 4Gen ES interiors over the ones the ES is using now. They're just not using enough wood today, probably because of cost-cutting. The 4Gen....now THAT was an interior. ;)
|
Originally Posted by bitkahuna
(Post 10419530)
What do any of these posts about tire ratio, ride quality, etc have to do with keeping cars 15 years or more? I think this thread is close to being closed. |
Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
(Post 10419633)
I think your viewpoints are out of touch with modern design. Yes, interior was nicely built, but the design is dated big time. IMO. I just looked up the wood in your buick, it's just lovely in color and design. As for wood, the 2019 ES has wood all the way around the cabin and all the way along the doors...how much more wood can it have?... https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.clu...7f17ccba46.jpg |
Originally Posted by Lexus2000
(Post 10419642)
The lower profile the tire is the more likely you are to trade your car in. That's all I've got.
|
Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
(Post 10419633)
I think your viewpoints are out of touch with modern design.
Yes, interior was nicely built, but the design is dated big time. IMO. https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.clu...4f83d02714.jpg I just looked up the wood in your buick, it's just lovely in color and design. |
Originally Posted by mmarshall
(Post 10419656)
I'm not concerned if my opinions are considered "trendy" or "in style" or not. I call it like I see it., whether others consider it "modern" or "dated".
See......that's just my point. Unlike some people, I don't look at things in terms of what's in style or not. Some things looked good 15 years ago....and still look good today. Want an extreme example?......the 1964 Mustang. People still go bonkers over it today. https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.clu...4f83d02714.jpg Thanks. It's not real wood, but IMO, in some ways, is better than real wood, which can deteriorate over time. And, of course, it does not require chopping down trees. Faux wood is fine with me. Doubt anyone on here can tell the difference. |
Originally Posted by mmarshall
(Post 10419630)
I'd take ether of those two 4Gen ES interiors over the ones the ES is using now. They're just not using enough wood today, probably because of cost-cutting. The 4Gen....now THAT was an interior. ;)
|
Big difference between a classic mustang and a Gen 4 ES300 lol
|
Thread completely off topic. Closed. |
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:24 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands