Notices
Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Innova

The Fastest SUVs On Sale

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 27, 2018 | 10:41 AM
  #16  
bitkahuna's Avatar
bitkahuna
CL Community Team
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 80,776
Likes: 3,985
Default

Originally Posted by TXgearhead
The Alfa won because it was the most engaging.
exactly my point, they rank by being engaging not something they have to live with for several years.

i did skim the article by the way which looked well written, i just wasn't that interested in their opinion on this.
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2018 | 10:57 AM
  #17  
Htony's Avatar
Htony
Lexus Champion
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 135
From: AB
Default

Originally Posted by Hoovey2411
I think you'll still see a V8 for the next generation. I can't see them dropping the V8 for a turbo six just yet. Would they utilize the Quadrifoglio powertrain? I dunno. We'll likely see a turbo 4 join the JGC line-up in base form, as well as typical diesel and V6 variants. Jeep and FCA had a great run with the Mercedes M-Class (W166) chassis that the current JGC is built on.
I still own last of W166 SUV 4.66 V8 biturbo. Fully loaded except Designo option. Had X5M, Porsche Cayenne Turbo S but this SUV is the only one my wife likes when we drive together. Enough room for our big dog, comfort, power when I need it. I seldom drive this over 2000 rpm, just at bottom end of turbo boost. MPG overall is not bad. I fill up once a ~month. Tank capacity is 100 liters. I always like to drive a car over powered than under powered. There is a remapped chip to push stock 420 hp to 600 which will make it a beast.
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2018 | 10:59 AM
  #18  
TXgearhead's Avatar
TXgearhead
Thread Starter
Intermediate
 
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 296
Likes: 17
From: Texas
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
exactly my point, they rank by being engaging not something they have to live with for several years.

i did skim the article by the way which looked well written, i just wasn't that interested in their opinion on this.
How would you like them to compare long term reliability and how livable the SUV is when they only have them for a week?

They have long term loaners for those kinds of tests, but that is what Consumer Reports specializes in, not MotorTrend. You are critiquing an article on something that they didnt set out to address. First line of the article: “One of these otherworldly SUVs is about to land at our Best Driver’s Car competition.” Clearly, the article is about how the SUV drives.

For example, a magazine ranks the best tasting hamburgers in New York. Would you criticize them because they didn’t rank the burgers by nutritional value?
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2018 | 11:09 AM
  #19  
bitkahuna's Avatar
bitkahuna
CL Community Team
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 80,776
Likes: 3,985
Default

Originally Posted by TXgearhead
... Clearly, the article is about how the SUV drives.
yes. clearly.

For example, a magazine ranks the best tasting hamburgers in New York. Would you criticize them because they didn’t rank the burgers by nutritional value?
thanks for the bait, but i'll pass. 'clearly' auto mag reporters review a ton of stuff and don't have to live with what they review so one must 'clearly' take their reviews with a grain of salt, plus the entertainment value. it's like top gear... plenty of entertainment, but not meaningful for people who actually put down their money to buy a car.
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2018 | 01:26 PM
  #20  
arentz07's Avatar
arentz07
Moderator
5 Year Member
Shutterbug
Community Influencer
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 9,606
Likes: 4,788
From: GA
Default

Originally Posted by TXgearhead
For example, a magazine ranks the best tasting hamburgers in New York. Would you criticize them because they didn’t rank the burgers by nutritional value?
Yeah but you eat the hamburger, then you go home. You go home IN the car.
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2018 | 08:36 AM
  #21  
TXgearhead's Avatar
TXgearhead
Thread Starter
Intermediate
 
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 296
Likes: 17
From: Texas
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
yes. clearly.

thanks for the bait, but i'll pass. 'clearly' auto mag reporters review a ton of stuff and don't have to live with what they review so one must 'clearly' take their reviews with a grain of salt, plus the entertainment value. it's like top gear... plenty of entertainment, but not meaningful for people who actually put down their money to buy a car.
Are you just trying to troll? They post a ton of GPS verified performance data about every car in the competition. It is a Best Driver competition, not a long term reliability study. For people that lease cars, like myself, I care about these reviews. I could give two ******* about long term maintenance and reliability. I treat my C43 like trash because I turn the car in at 50k miles. most of the people that will end up with the cars in this competition will lease. Sure, the Jeep SRT will probably have a good chunk of their buyers hold on to the car long term, but most of these cars will be traded in before their warranty expires, that’s how the high end luxury segment works now.

You clearly are concerned with long term reliability and maintenance, not everyone else is. They are catering to the majority of the shoppers in this segment.
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2018 | 10:04 AM
  #22  
arentz07's Avatar
arentz07
Moderator
5 Year Member
Shutterbug
Community Influencer
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 9,606
Likes: 4,788
From: GA
Default

I think bitkahuna has a valid point, but so do you. People who buy these cars want to enjoy them. There's a balance to be had here of being tons of fun because it's pushed to its limits when driven hard versus being so reliable that it's lame. I wouldn't want a car on either extreme, though I'd skew more toward the reliable side within a given segment. Even if it's a lease, I don't want it to be in the shop often if at all.
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2018 | 10:15 AM
  #23  
TXgearhead's Avatar
TXgearhead
Thread Starter
Intermediate
 
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 296
Likes: 17
From: Texas
Default

Originally Posted by arentz07
I think bitkahuna has a valid point, but so do you. People who buy these cars want to enjoy them. There's a balance to be had here of being tons of fun because it's pushed to its limits when driven hard versus being so reliable that it's lame. I wouldn't want a car on either extreme, though I'd skew more toward the reliable side within a given segment. Even if it's a lease, I don't want it to be in the shop often if at all.
Consumer Reports exists for this reason. My point is, you don’t have to put it all in one article. People are intelligent enough to know that just because an SUV wins a best driver competition, doesn’t necessarily mean it is also the most reliable in the segment.
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2018 | 10:44 AM
  #24  
bitkahuna's Avatar
bitkahuna
CL Community Team
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 80,776
Likes: 3,985
Default

TXgearhead, i think you need to lighten up. motortrend is fine, car & driver is fine, as is road & track, alex on autos, doug demuro, etc. they all provide a combination of objective and subjective information and are to varying degrees, entertaining. as for consumer reports, i think they're worthless when it comes to cars, with bogus 'methodology' summarizing 'surveys' of subscribers who are paying to hear their made the right choice in buying some automotive appliance, but i digress.

I treat my C43 like trash because I turn the car in at 50k miles.
and that right there is why i won't buy a shiny used car 'off-lease'.
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2018 | 10:45 AM
  #25  
Htony's Avatar
Htony
Lexus Champion
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 135
From: AB
Default

Originally Posted by arentz07
I think bitkahuna has a valid point, but so do you. People who buy these cars want to enjoy them. There's a balance to be had here of being tons of fun because it's pushed to its limits when driven hard versus being so reliable that it's lame. I wouldn't want a car on either extreme, though I'd skew more toward the reliable side within a given segment. Even if it's a lease, I don't want it to be in the shop often if at all.
That's right, give and take. It is driver's call, not any one else. When I had Porsche I knew it's known problem which I took care of in advance installing improved version of parts. It was reliable car. Just cost more when scheduled service time comes around. In between service interval did not have any problem which makes it reliable. On the contrary Audi was different story. (local Audi service tech couldn't even decode VCDS diag. result. Problem was loss of windshield wiper fluid spray. I had to pin point the bad wiring harness running between front engine bay to tail gate windshield. They try to over lay one broken wire in the harness. I said No. Replacement harness took 3 weeks from Germany. Total down time was more than a month. Pissed me off big time. End of Audi ownership.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bitkahuna
Car Chat
33
May 7, 2017 03:17 PM
Motor
Car Chat
8
Aug 5, 2015 07:39 PM
Hoovey689
Car Chat
49
Mar 24, 2015 08:19 AM
inLine4
Car Chat
4
Oct 3, 2008 12:34 PM
Nauticalx
Car Chat
25
Feb 21, 2007 10:56 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:55 AM.