Notices
Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Innova

2018 Honda Accord

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 12, 2017 | 08:43 PM
  #91  
FatherTo1's Avatar
FatherTo1
Racer
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 1,846
Likes: 117
From: Sacramento, CA
Default

The new Accord looks sportier from the front but I agree with others that it looks unfinished, as if there was a design battle and the team ran out of time. I don't really care for the 3/4 view at all as it is reminiscent of the hideous Accord CrossTour. I was reading a MotorTrend comparo between the Accord and Camry and overall the Accord is the better car, with a more inviting interior and better driving dynamics. Glad the Accord redeems itself with content and substance but, from the angle below, it looks like the car was in an accident and missing parts of the front headlight assembly. The previous Accord was better styled to me.

Reply
Old Oct 13, 2017 | 02:08 AM
  #92  
Fizzboy7's Avatar
Fizzboy7
Lexus Test Driver
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 9,997
Likes: 248
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by FatherTo1
The new Accord looks sportier from the front but I agree with others that it looks unfinished, as if there was a design battle and the team ran out of time. I don't really care for the 3/4 view at all as it is reminiscent of the hideous Accord CrossTour. I was reading a MotorTrend comparo between the Accord and Camry and overall the Accord is the better car, with a more inviting interior and better driving dynamics. Glad the Accord redeems itself with content and substance but, from the angle below, it looks like the car was in an accident and missing parts of the front headlight assembly. The previous Accord was better styled to me.

I agree with you word for word. The front looks totally unfinished. There really is no grille. It's just a big gaping hole with a jumbo unibrow over it. Lazy stylists. I can't see how this appears appealing to anyone, but somehow Car & Driver thinks this is the best looking Accord ever. Can you imagine how such a sharp, upper area would be in a pedestrian collision? It would slice the body right in half! Progress, NOT. This is a major safety hazard for peds. And anything that resembles a Crosstour is shameful. That and the ZDX were two of the ugliest body shapes in recent times.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2017 | 04:54 AM
  #93  
rogerh00's Avatar
rogerh00
Racer
Veteran: Air Force
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,488
Likes: 52
From: FL
Default

Wow, that angle shows the front nose looking awful.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2017 | 05:47 AM
  #94  
mmarshall's Avatar
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 94,521
Likes: 261
From: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Default

Originally Posted by Fizzboy7
. The front looks totally unfinished. There really is no grille. It's just a big gaping hole with a jumbo unibrow over it.
Yep. Looks like a car still in a body shop where they have not yet replaced the grille.


but somehow Car & Driver thinks this is the best looking Accord ever.
It doesn't look bad once you get past the grille.

Can you imagine how such a sharp, upper area would be in a pedestrian collision? It would slice the body right in half! Progress, NOT. This is a major safety hazard for peds
DOT and NHTSA, though, (apparently) OK'ed the design.

And anything that resembles a Crosstour is shameful. That and the ZDX were two of the ugliest body shapes in recent times.
Though the Crosstour wasn't exactly handsome, I'd consider the ZDX much worse.....around the same level as the Pontiac Aztek. The main problem with the Crosstour was not so much its ugliness as the fact that, unlike the competing Subaru Outback, the egg-shaped rear of the Crosstour just didn't have the same space-efficiency and cargo area. The Honda engineers, IMO, would have been far better off using the platform of the nice, squared-off Acura TSX Sportwagon for the Crosstour, but they didn't.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2017 | 11:04 AM
  #95  
situman's Avatar
situman
Lead Lap
15 Year Member
Community Builder
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,931
Likes: 306
From: NY
Default

They took the Civic design, stretched it and made it even uglier than the ugly civic design. You gotta be a hardcore Accord fan to buy this thing, unless you dont plan on looking at the car from the outside ever. Get in the car before the suns up and get home after the sun sets and don't ever turn the lights on.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2017 | 01:21 PM
  #96  
pman6's Avatar
pman6
Racer
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,946
Likes: 24
From: CALIFORNIA
Default

They tried to do fastback coupe, but got something ugly instead.



Reply
Old Oct 13, 2017 | 04:46 PM
  #97  
evident's Avatar
evident
Racer
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,849
Likes: 216
From: PA
Default

doesn't really look so bad. previous generation pre-mmc still looks better IMO.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2017 | 04:53 PM
  #98  
GSteg's Avatar
GSteg
Rookie
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 16,018
Likes: 81
From: CA
Default

Having no grill is going to be the new fad.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2017 | 05:02 PM
  #99  
jer's Avatar
jer
Pole Position
15 Year Member
Community Builder
Active Streak: 30 Days
Liked
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,033
Likes: 150
From: fl
Default

Personally I like it. Have to see in person if I still feel the same way. As far as the interior, if it looks as good in person as in pics, I think it's much better than the new Camry. But these are subjective, as it's what each individual likes.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2017 | 05:52 PM
  #100  
Propulsion's Avatar
Propulsion
Advanced
 
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 517
Likes: 44
From: Earth
Default


It looks gorgeous in Touring Trim.
The headlight cluster is full LEDs whereas the lower specs are partial LED.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2017 | 06:24 PM
  #101  
mmarshall's Avatar
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 94,521
Likes: 261
From: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Default

Look at those tires LOL. The wheel-rims themselves might as well be sitting on the carpet.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2017 | 06:44 PM
  #102  
Hoovey689's Avatar
Hoovey689
2UR-GSE Owner
15 Year Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 42,476
Likes: 321
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
Look at those tires LOL. The wheel-rims themselves might as well be sitting on the carpet.
Don't judge a book by its cover. You don't need a large sidewall anymore to have a comfortable ride. The Accord Touring has Adaptive Variable Suspension (dampers) and fluid-filled bushings to help improve ride quality. Also active noise cancellation helps mask road and engine noise (always a Honda sore spot).
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2017 | 07:35 PM
  #103  
mmarshall's Avatar
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 94,521
Likes: 261
From: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Default

Originally Posted by Hoovey2411
Don't judge a book by its cover. You don't need a large sidewall anymore to have a comfortable ride.
You usually do for what I would consider a comfortable ride...though I'll admit that the Lincoln MKZ doesn't do badly with 45s, and some of the older BMWs with even lower profiles than that. But that is not the only issue with wagon-wheels and rubber-band tires. You generally lose some pothole/impact protection, it lowers the stance of the car over speed-bumps, ramps, etc....causing underbelly and air-dam scrapes, makes the tires more expensive to replace, and can cause added suspension/steering-system wear by transmitting more road-impacts through to them. Given a choice, I'll pass.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2017 | 06:12 AM
  #104  
SW17LS's Avatar
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
Active Streak: 60 Days
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 68,826
Likes: 4,103
From: Maryland
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
You usually do for what I would consider a comfortable ride...though I'll admit that the Lincoln MKZ doesn't do badly with 45s, and some of the older BMWs with even lower profiles than that. But that is not the only issue with wagon-wheels and rubber-band tires. You generally lose some pothole/impact protection, it lowers the stance of the car over speed-bumps, ramps, etc....causing underbelly and air-dam scrapes, makes the tires more expensive to replace, and can cause added suspension/steering-system wear by transmitting more road-impacts through to them. Given a choice, I'll pass.
What?! Low profile tires don’t lower the stance of the car at all. The wheel/tire combo is the same diameter, there is just more wheel and less tire.

Thats why higher profile fires are on 18s and lower profile fires in 20s. The wheel tire combo diameter for both is the same.

Reply
Old Oct 14, 2017 | 06:51 AM
  #105  
bitkahuna's Avatar
bitkahuna
CL Community Team
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 80,854
Likes: 4,022
Default

Originally Posted by FatherTo1
The new Accord looks sportier from the front but I agree with others that it looks unfinished, as if there was a design battle and the team ran out of time. I don't really care for the 3/4 view at all as it is reminiscent of the hideous Accord CrossTour. I was reading a MotorTrend comparo between the Accord and Camry and overall the Accord is the better car, with a more inviting interior and better driving dynamics. Glad the Accord redeems itself with content and substance but, from the angle below, it looks like the car was in an accident and missing parts of the front headlight assembly. The previous Accord was better styled to me.

that front looks truly hideous.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:52 AM.