Checked out a Buick Cascada convertible today.
The big SUVs from GM are all off the same platform, the Escalade, Tahoe, Suburban are all related.
Same thing for LX of LC from the 200 series
Or the GX460 and Prado from the 150 series which I think the 4Runner uses.
It's pretty straightforward.
I would hate for a Crzue, Verano, Cascada or even Astra (if they read this forum) shopper to get the incorrect information.
I would hate for a Cruze, Verano, Cascada or even Astra (if they read this forum) shopper to get the incorrect information.
Anyhow...with all due respect, I'm off to another subject. We've been on this long enough.
Celebrating Lexus & Toyota from Around the Globe
Take a Cascada out for a spin when you get a chance, Jill....though Toronto this time of year can be simply too cold with the top down. But sample one when the weather warms up a little.....I don't think you will be disappointed with it.
Last edited by mmarshall; Feb 22, 2016 at 01:52 PM.
However, a well-designed rear suspension can minimize the cross-bumping effect of a beam or live rear axle. Even the simplest and most compact of suspensions today (such as McPherson struts) are far more sophisticated and efficient than they were decades ago.
Last edited by mmarshall; Feb 22, 2016 at 02:11 PM.
I would add that while its possible to minimize the cross bump effect, its always a compromise or a workaround and is never ideal. You reach a certain point in the price and mission statement of a car where you don't want it to be a compromise anymore and you want the core components of the car to be ideal for the application. Thats my issue with Buicks being "premium" yet still utilizing an economy car rear suspension.
I've also noticed more or less the same effect in the cars I've owned with IRS....Mazdas, IS300, Outback, etc.......
You're not going convince me that somehow...for the Verano and Cascada the solid rear axle was the right choice and not just the "cheap, good enough" choice.














