Checked out a Buick Cascada convertible today.
No mmarshall. The Delta II platform was created in Germany for worldwide production of small compact cars such as the Cruze/Verano/Astra. All of the cars off the Delta II platform are one or another related. Cruze/Verano/Astra are all pretty much the same car just parts bin'd a little different. No different than ES/Avalon, Escalade/Tahoe, Land Cruiser/LX etc etc etc.
Depending on some other design factors as well, a beam-axle in back can actually add to the rigidity of the underpinnings. The effect is (more or less) like what you see when you open the hoods of some high-performance or sport-oriented vehicles and see the strut-brace across the engine compartment connecting the tops of the two front-suspension towers.
As for the rear beam axle in the Cascada, it is there for simply cost cutting measures and for nothing else as its cheaper to design, built and install such a unit for a small car. There is nothing special in any way that the Corolla/Verano/Cruze all come with beam designs.
Cars such as the Civic, Mazda 3 all come with IRS rear suspensions. That is impressive for such small compact cars.
Buicks biggest caveat is that there are essentially charging $33k-$40k for vehicles that have under chassis components that one would find on a $15k Cruze. Nothing wrong with that as most people won't notice, but at that price point one should perhaps call this out.
According to CR's Owner Surveys, Verano buyers are fairly satisfied. 69% said they'd "Definitely buy again" (Regal was 72%). Leaders in the segment were A3 80%, A4 74%, C Class 74%, 3 Series 72%,
Means very little. CR is not the greatest source of info. They custom tailor it too much.
No mmarshall. The Delta II platform was created in Germany for worldwide production of small compact cars such as the Cruze/Verano/Astra. All of the cars off the Delta II platform are one or another related. Cruze/Verano/Astra are all pretty much the same car just parts bin'd a little different. No different than ES/Avalon, Escalade/Tahoe, Land Cruiser/LX etc etc etc.
An unreliable car, BTW, can have extremely high owner-satisfation rates, as the Dodge Charger and Challenger prove.
As for the rear beam axle in the Cascada, it is there for simply cost cutting measures and for nothing else as its cheaper to design, built and install such a unit for a small car. There is nothing special in any way that the Corolla/Verano/Cruze all come with beam designs.
Cars such as the Civic, Mazda 3 all come with IRS rear suspensions. That is impressive for such small compact cars.
Buicks biggest caveat is that there are essentially charging $33k-$40k for vehicles that have under chassis components that one would find on a $15k Cruze.
Last edited by mmarshall; Feb 18, 2016 at 12:05 PM.
Case in point, my neighbour let's his 10 year son fill out the CR and JD Power surveys everytime he buys a new car. He always says have a little fun with the surveys but don't take them to seriously.
More recently, my older parents forwarded me the JD Power surveys to fill out on their behalf, well I could of had a little fun if I wanted to, but I didn't bother filling out the survey.
I think manufacturers data on how people bought the car again or what they traded the car for would be best.
And the exact same Z-link rear comes with the upper trim level Cruze. And it is considered cheaper to build, design, install compared to multilink strut (ES350) or the front multi strut vs double wishbone which cars under $50k and FWD rarely offer.











