Not so Luxury
i'm talking about a hypothetical car that IF i'm even actually able to ever afford won't be for a LONG time but i wanna see a lexus with a V12 that'll make MB executives in stuttgart quiver in their lederhosens
you sorta just proved my point. nobody "needs" their watch to have 70 diamonds embedded in it, just like nobody "needs" a V12. diamonds are probably the ultimate luxury in jewelry, just like a V12 is the ultimate luxury in engines. there's gonna be some super rich guy (or woman because it's 2015 and clublexus is of course not gender biased) is gonna want a big V12 luxobarge flagship but a rolls royce is a bit out of the price range, they'll pretty much have to get an S600 or a 760Li
i wanna see a lexus with a V12 that'll make MB executives in stuttgart quiver in their lederhosens
i'm sure they wouldn't sell very many and it'd probably not be a cost effective program but it wouldn't be the first time toyota has undertaken a big project and not turned a profit...
just to be clear i don't think it's really necessary to make a V12 lexus but i just think it'd be pretty cool to have lol... it might even shush some of the "it's just a nice toyota" people lol
"Luxury" is one of those things that depends on the user.
If you're someone who is accustomed to cars of this caliber, then no...they aren't "luxurious" any more. If you're a Rolls Royce owner, then no, none of these cars are "luxury" cars.
To the vast majority of people, a Lexus is certainly a luxury car, and something that is unattainable probably ever in their lives. Thats something we loose sight of, for 95% of the people in this country, a $40,000 car is something they likely will never be able to afford.
What you're missing is that "luxury" is not about being capable. Its about fulfilling wants that go beyond what someone needs. Citizen makes watches with precise automatic movement, they are "just as capable" as a Rolex, yet why are they not as "luxurious" as a Rolex? Because the brand, the history, the track record creates part of what makes it "luxurious".
Thats what Lexus lacks, but it will get there. I was 9 years old when Lexus came out, my Dad wanted one at the time but had to wait another 8 years before he could finally get one. So much of our worldview comes from how we were raised. For my kids, they will grow up seeing Lexus as a brand having come long before them, remember their dad driving them and them being an important symbol of luxury and success for him, and to them they will have just as much heritage as Mercedes and more.
It just takes time.
If you're someone who is accustomed to cars of this caliber, then no...they aren't "luxurious" any more. If you're a Rolls Royce owner, then no, none of these cars are "luxury" cars.
To the vast majority of people, a Lexus is certainly a luxury car, and something that is unattainable probably ever in their lives. Thats something we loose sight of, for 95% of the people in this country, a $40,000 car is something they likely will never be able to afford.
What you're missing is that "luxury" is not about being capable. Its about fulfilling wants that go beyond what someone needs. Citizen makes watches with precise automatic movement, they are "just as capable" as a Rolex, yet why are they not as "luxurious" as a Rolex? Because the brand, the history, the track record creates part of what makes it "luxurious".
Thats what Lexus lacks, but it will get there. I was 9 years old when Lexus came out, my Dad wanted one at the time but had to wait another 8 years before he could finally get one. So much of our worldview comes from how we were raised. For my kids, they will grow up seeing Lexus as a brand having come long before them, remember their dad driving them and them being an important symbol of luxury and success for him, and to them they will have just as much heritage as Mercedes and more.
It just takes time.
Last edited by dseag2; Nov 17, 2015 at 07:35 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
speedflex
Car Chat
21
May 17, 2008 09:08 PM













