When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I think you misinterpreted the post. I believe Jill was referring to the actual 'buttons' vs a traditional floor or column mounted shifter rather than debating the PRNDL layout
Yes my post was misread, and I could care less that the PDRNL is mandated.
Part of the reason automakers are using dash-buttons (or in some cases, stub-levers on the steering column) is an attempt to free up more space on the center-consoles. Same reason for doing away with the pull-up levers for the parking brake. It frees up more space for electronic-plug-outlets and/or cupholders. Gotta have that latte at Starbucks, you know.
That objective can still be accomplished with the ****, of course.
That objective can still be accomplished with the ****, of course.
Yes, there are several ways. Jaguars and the Chrysler 200 have the rotary-**** for the shifter on the console. The Ram trucks, as your image shows, has it on the lower dash. Jags do it in a slick way that drops the **** down into the console when it is not being used....but the general idea is to get it off the console.
Last edited by mmarshall; Aug 7, 2015 at 02:47 PM.
I like it better than the Lincoln pushbuttons too, to be honest.
It may (?) turn out to be more durable and reliable than the Lincoln push-buttons, too. The old Chrysler push-buttons from the 1960s were tough and durable. The ones in the new Lincolns, in contrast, have a thin plastic-feel.....like they will break after a couple of years of pushing.