Notices
Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Innova
View Poll Results: What name should Toyota use for the production Toyota FT-1?
Supra gets my vote!
129
84.31%
I don't know, but its time for a new name.
24
15.69%
Voters: 153. You may not vote on this poll

Toyota Supra / FT-1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 9, 2016 | 09:49 AM
  #931  
Stroock639's Avatar
Stroock639
Lexus Test Driver
10 Year Member
Community Builder
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 6,244
Likes: 472
From: Long Island
Default

Originally Posted by TF109B
Toyota make enough money, a sales hit with the Supra shouldn't concern them. It helps brand image as well as having a sports car to have for purchase. Costs to produce should be lower thanks to the BMW partnership.
thank you, cars like these aren't meant to make money. they're meant to draw people into the brand and showcase what toyota is technologically capable of. toyota has historically done things that weren't profitable and that's always when they make their best cars (LS 400, LFA, Supra) so i don't know why it's so unfathomable that they couldn't do it again.
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2016 | 11:10 AM
  #932  
rmito's Avatar
rmito
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 15
Likes: 2
From: CA
Default Supra spied

As we knew, it will share a platform with the BMW Z5.

Looking nice.

http://www.autoblog.com/2016/09/07/t...#slide-4049768
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2016 | 12:28 PM
  #933  
movin_up's Avatar
movin_up
Driver
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
From: Louisville, KY
Default

Originally Posted by Stroock639
a Supra shouldn't be something that everyone can buy. it's not an FR-S. the Supra has always been a Skyline competitor with similar performance, why would you want this new one to get completely #rekt by the GT-R? the Supra shouldn't sell in large numbers, seeing one on the street should make you go "whoa!! it's a Supra!!" i don't want to see a lot of Supras being driven around, rarity and exclusivity creates demand and excitement.
Originally Posted by Stroock639
good, the Supra shouldn't sell in high numbers. it's a disgrace to the Supra name for the "good" version to top out at $50,000, which is less than a Supra cost 20 years ago NOT taking inflation into account. how is toyota supposed to take down godzilla when you want the Supra to be something designed to sell in high numbers and be profitable?
I understand your points, but Nissan went bat**** crazy with the GTR and I don't think that Toyota intends to compete on that level with this car. Toyota wants a car with driving dynamics that you can have some fun with. They want you to buy it with a manual transmission and feel what the car is doing. They don't want an over-complicated transmission and launch control to put good numbers on paper that you won't actually use day to day.

I think the Supra was always intended to sit alongside the Z and the RX7. The GTR was kind of its own weird thing. I think the Z will get a makeover to slot into the competition with this Supra and hopefully a Mazda will come into the picture again too. Let the GTR do what it does. I think if Toyota wants to take that on they'll do it with a Lexus.
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2016 | 12:36 PM
  #934  
UDel's Avatar
UDel
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 12,269
Likes: 296
From: ------
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
i think $40k is delusional.

The Supra Turbo in 1993 was about $46k. In 1998 (18 years ago!), when it was cancelled, the Supra Turbo was base MSRP of over $55k.
The Supra was killed in the US relatively quickly because it was priced too high and did not have many buyers. I think they had a special edition/price on Supra turbo's in 97 of around $40K or 45K and it still did not sell very many. I hope they don't make the same mistake of pricing it too high again especially considering how big the market is for muscle cars with their relatively low price for the performance they offer but from the looks of that camo concept and it possibly having a 4cyl base engine this new Supra is not going to be anywhere near as special, desirable, and high end as the last one.
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2016 | 12:49 PM
  #935  
UDel's Avatar
UDel
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 12,269
Likes: 296
From: ------
Default

Originally Posted by Stroock639
a Supra shouldn't be something that everyone can buy. it's not an FR-S. the Supra has always been a Skyline competitor with similar performance, why would you want this new one to get completely #rekt by the GT-R? the Supra shouldn't sell in large numbers, seeing one on the street should make you go "whoa!! it's a Supra!!" i don't want to see a lot of Supras being driven around, rarity and exclusivity creates demand and excitement.
The last Supra being a rare site on the streets and not selling in large numbers is why it was killed pretty quickly in the US, it was too expensive for most buyers and they did not sell many. Same exact thing will happen if they price it anywhere near 90K, they won't sell and they will quickly take it off the market.

The GTR is now a huge hp exotic killer costing as much as a S class, it was not like that in the 90's where it was not as expensive, performance more in line with the 300ZX turbo, and was not putting out 911 turbo/Ferrari numbers so expecting a new Supra to compete directly with a 100K specialty vehicle like the modern GTR with its bespoke 550hp engine, advanced awd system, etc is setting yourself up for disappointment.
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2016 | 02:35 PM
  #936  
redspencer's Avatar
redspencer
OG Member
20 Year Member
Veteran: Marine Corps
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,870
Likes: 563
From: Central FL
Default

One of the best indicators on what to anticipate from the new Supra is from an interview with Tetsuya Tada, the Chief Engineer of Toyota's sports division. Based on the little clues that he left, it's extremely unlikely that the highest trim version of the MKV Supra is going to be priced at $40k.

Here's an excerpt of the interview:

Nearly five years on from the debut of the 86 and Tada-san is ready to look at the future of the sports car for Toyota.

Traditionally polite, warm and with a cheeky sense of humour, Tada-san sat down with news.com.au over dinner in Tokyo to talk about what lies ahead for sports cars.

“Our sports car future at Toyota will revolve around three cars — 86 in the middle, S-FR down the bottom and one on top like the Supra,” he said.

The mention of the Supra immediately garnered excitement by all in the room, it’s a nameplate that Toyota has retired, but there had been word that the company is working on a replacement with BMW for some time now.

“If we do it, it must be something never seen before by Toyota,” he said.

“Hybrid technology is a key technology for us, but if we release a hybrid sports car in the market, it must be something new.

“It must be something that makes people say ‘wow!’”


“Like with 86, when we put small Prius tyres on it. Journalist’s complained when they saw it announced, but most were really surprised when they drove it. That’s the type of surprise we want.”

Toyota’s strong investment in hybrid technology, beginning with the very unsporty Prius will likely result in the tech evolving into high performance powertrains for the next Supra.

But it won’t be like Honda’s new NSX, Tada-san said. How that will differ from the Honda’s use of an electric motor to compliment its turbocharged six-cylinder engine, he wouldn’t say, but he promised it will be something completely unseen before.
http://www.news.com.au/technology/in...54971cc633c466
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2016 | 02:40 PM
  #937  
Hoovey689's Avatar
Hoovey689
2UR-GSE Owner
15 Year Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 42,476
Likes: 320
From: California
Default

If there is a base turbo 4 I can see it being around $40K. With a six cylinder and / or with electric motors, the Supra will likely be $60-70K. Regardless the Supra will likely be playing with Corvette money.
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2016 | 04:51 PM
  #938  
gymratter's Avatar
gymratter
Lead Lap
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 782
Likes: 0
From: TX
Default Decamoing the Supra Prototype

http://www.supramkv.com/threads/deca...prototype.362/


Last edited by gymratter; Sep 25, 2016 at 09:42 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2016 | 05:16 PM
  #939  
redspencer's Avatar
redspencer
OG Member
20 Year Member
Veteran: Marine Corps
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,870
Likes: 563
From: Central FL
Default

That looks a bit like the old MKIV Supra Concept.


Reply
Old Sep 9, 2016 | 05:21 PM
  #940  
gymratter's Avatar
gymratter
Lead Lap
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 782
Likes: 0
From: TX
Default

^I heard the same comments from other forums as well.



I'm thinking it will be an I6. The hood appears to be pretty long. Compare to FT-HS which designers envision to be a V6 hybrid.

Reply
Old Sep 9, 2016 | 05:35 PM
  #941  
RNM GS3's Avatar
RNM GS3
Lexus Test Driver
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 8,199
Likes: 246
From: New York
Default

If it's not a Toyota Inline 6 - I'm not interested!

If I want a BMW engine, just get the M4 or Z5 version also I'm not a fan of turbo V6s.

OTOH if this new Supra is priced between $55-70k with a Toyota TT Inline 6, I will sell my BRZ and put a deposit down immediately.
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2016 | 06:19 PM
  #942  
Och's Avatar
Och
Lexus Champion
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,953
Likes: 225
From: NY
Default

Originally Posted by RNM GS3
If it's not a Toyota Inline 6 - I'm not interested!

If I want a BMW engine, just get the M4 or Z5 version also I'm not a fan of turbo V6s.

OTOH if this new Supra is priced between $55-70k with a Toyota TT Inline 6, I will sell my BRZ and put a deposit down immediately.
BMW never made a turbo V6, or even NA V6 to the best of my knowledge. All of their 6 cylinder engines are inline.
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2016 | 08:47 AM
  #943  
RNM GS3's Avatar
RNM GS3
Lexus Test Driver
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 8,199
Likes: 246
From: New York
Default

Originally Posted by Och
BMW never made a turbo V6, or even NA V6 to the best of my knowledge. All of their 6 cylinder engines are inline.
Yes i know that hence why I drive BMWs because I love the inline6s and hate V6s.
But I dont want a BMW engine in a new Supra!
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2016 | 10:57 AM
  #944  
Stroock639's Avatar
Stroock639
Lexus Test Driver
10 Year Member
Community Builder
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 6,244
Likes: 472
From: Long Island
Default

yea i don't want anything called a Supra to not have an inline-6 and not be a complete toyota only effort. if they're going to collaborate with anyone let it be yamaha (like they have successfully done many times already) i don't want bmw to be involved with this, at least not if they're going to call it a Supra.
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2016 | 02:28 AM
  #945  
AshyBone's Avatar
AshyBone
Pit Crew
10 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 125
Likes: 2
From: new mexico
Default

Originally Posted by JessePS
As a previous FR-S owner I never once had an issue, other than the brake lights constantly having condensation.
Also as a previous FR-S owner, I can confirm this statement. Only Issue I've ever had in my 3 years of ownership were the condensation in the taillights. And that car saw numerous track days, drift events, street races, and highway pulls.... I miss you little buddy :'(
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:19 AM.