Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

Review: 2013 Cadillac XTS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-30-13, 10:52 AM
  #1  
Hoovey689
Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 42,283
Received 122 Likes on 82 Posts
Default Review: 2013 Cadillac XTS

2013 Cadillac XTS


"The Cadillac Of Stopgaps"


Gallery:
http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2013-...photo-5604852/

As confusing as most alphanumeric car names have gotten in recent years, at least one constant has been that the letter "X" is generally indicative of a crossover. Then why did General Motors use this letter on its new 2013 Cadillac XTS luxury sedan? Well, for that, we'll have to look to the world of mathematics where "X" stands for an unknown variable or a placeholder. Now we're talking. The XTS is just an interim product sitting at the top of Cadillac's four-door food chain until the brand gets a true flagship in place. That sounds like a lot of resources to spend on what will likely be a one-and-done model, but the automaker needed to get something – anything – to replace the DTS.

So here you have the 2013 XTS. A big luxury sedan that was created to bridge the gap between Cadillac's recent past and its pending future. Going into our week with this XTS knowing that it was a stopgap measure proved to be both a blessing and a curse. On one hand, we know (or hope) that this car will act as a baseline for future high-end Cadillac models, but at the same time, we couldn't help but be mindful of past stopgap models, albeit in more entry-level segments, like the Cimarron and Catera.




The XTS proves that GM has finally gotten platform sharing to the point where it's no longer a trivial game of "spot the differences" between products from its various brands. Although the XTS shares many of its underpinnings with the Buick LaCrosse and the 2014 Chevrolet Impala, the three cars look nothing alike. Overall, the XTS – along with the ATS – shows a promising evolution of Cadillac's signature styling cues, and it looks remarkably good even on a car measuring almost 17 feet in length. From most angles, it's hard to criticize the design of the XTS, but the rear three-quarter view exposes some of the car's chunkiness, which is likely a result of the long rear overhang and the short decklid. The bulky rear end does help the XTS provide a cavernous 18 cubic feet of cargo space, which happens to be almost two cubic feet (an extra piece of luggage) more than the Mercedes-Benz S-Class.

As nice as the overall styling of the XTS is, the exterior lighting might be the car's most expressive design elements. Up front, the headlights have a softer, rounder shape than previous Cadillac "Art & Science" designs, and there are also stylish lower running lights that line up perfectly with the headlights as if each side has a single light tube tucked in behind the fascia. Likewise, the vertical taillights also add to the car's appearance and even have some slight fin action that pays homage to classic Cadillacs. Perhaps the coolest exterior features on the XTS, though, are the illuminated door handles.




Most versions of the XTS get features such as adaptive headlights and the parallelogram-shaped exhaust outlets integrated into the rear fascia, but our tester was the top-of-the-line XTS-4 Platinum, which included a distinctive satin-chrome grille, standard 20-inch wheels and available White Diamond Tricoat paint.

Things get even better for the XTS once you look inside the car. GM has hit some pretty big milestones for interior quality over the last several years, including the 2008 Malibu and the 2010 LaCrosse, but it wouldn't be hard to argue that the XTS has one of the best-looking, highest-quality interiors GM has ever put together, and maybe even one of the best interiors found in a car priced under $100,000. Our Platinum tester had a nice mix of hues and materials, from three colors of leather used on the seats and instrument panel to the real wood, piano black and metallic accents. You can't touch anything inside this car without it being covered in some rich material, right down to the microfiber suede covering the headliner and A-pillars.

Front passengers are treated to wide, plush seats wrapped in soft perforated leather with heat and ventilating functions; you're not going to confuse the XTS seats for sport buckets, but as the theme of the car proved, it's not trying to be a sport sedan. Rear seat occupants are rewarded with plenty of headroom and legroom, as well as heated bottoms for the outboard passengers and sunshades for the side and rear window. For long hauls, the back seat is definitely the place to be.


Like the exterior, lighting also plays a big role inside the XTS with ambient lamps that emanate from just about everywhere at night, along with steering wheel, center stack and even rear-seat controls that illuminate only when the car is on.

In addition to the comfort afforded to XTS occupants, the car also delivers the expected amount of technology in this price class. Stealing a page from the Jaguar playbook, the XTS has a massive LCD screen for the gauge cluster that offers four different layouts with numerous information screens, and for more data, our tester also had a head-up display. Another innovative technology introduced on the XTS is the Safety Alert Seat, or as we like to call it, the butt buzzer. This uses separate buzzers on each side of the seat to relay different information to the driver. While driving, if the car starts to veer out of its lane to the left, then the left side of the seat bottom will vibrate; likewise, if the driver is backing up blindly and a car is approaching from the left, then the left side will vibrate.

In many regards, you just can't beat the XTS' interior, but there might be some objections to its functionality, mostly where it concerns the new CUE – Cadillac User Experience – interface and its associated technologies and controls. More than just an infotainment system, CUE is how passengers interact with the car, and like any other advanced infotainment technology (think MyFord Touch), there is definitely a learning curve to dealing with this system.

Most vehicle operations can be controlled either by touch or voice, but the capacitive touch buttons and touch-screen display are sometimes slow to respond, so after you've accidentally double-clicked an option, you have to find the way to back up a step. Further creating some potential confusion, there are no hard buttons on the center stack, so the capacitive controls there have a weird "thud" feedback when operated. Keeping in mind that this is the first generation of CUE, we actually applaud Cadillac for not pigeonholing the XTS' interior by leaving out high-tech features to appease former DTS clientele. It's not easy judging a system like this after having only used it for a week, but like with MyFord Touch, we bet that owners who deal with CUE on a daily basis will have far fewer problems with the interface than we did. And when frustration levels become too high, CUE's voice recognition system is actually one of the better we've used and can easily handle inputs for functions used often while driving like changing channels or finding albums to play on your smartphone.

While the styling, luxury and technology of the XTS are all top-notch, it's what you can't see that prevents this car from holding a flagship status. Many luxury sedans in this size and price range get rear-wheel drive and at least offer a V8 engine, but the XTS is only offered with a direct-injected 3.6-liter V6 engine powering the front wheels through a six-speed automatic transmission. Our test car was the 4,215-pound, all-wheel-drive model, making the engine's 304 horsepower and 264 pound-feet of torque feel underpowered at times. But this car isn't about speed or quickness. It's about a smooth, comfortable ride, and Cadillac nailed this aspect seeing as how the XTS will, like the DTS and STS it replaces, continue to be a popular choice among the snowbird crowd. (To properly experience this, we did our week-long test of the XTS in – you guessed it – Florida.)


With names like Brembo, Haldex and Magnetic Ride Control listed on the spec sheet of our tester, we could have just as easily been testing a sporty European sedan, but as nice as the interior is, driving the XTS will quickly confirm that "sport" is not in this car's vocabulary. As advanced as GM's LFX V6 is, it feels overworked in the XTS under moderate to heavy acceleration, which didn't surprise us when our week's worth of driving netted a combined 18.2 miles per gallon compared to the official EPA numbers of 17 city and 26 highway. If it were sportier to drive, we could live with such a number, but as a car that will likely make many a road trip from the Rust Belt to the Sunshine State, fuel economy was subpar.

On said road trips though, GM's Magnetic Ride Control shines in the XTS. The real-time, four-wheel suspension damping mixed with the rear air suspension makes this car an absolute dream to drive, absorbing potholes and road imperfections like a champ without ever feeling too soft or spongy. The Haldex all-wheel-drive system will come in handy for those aforementioned snowbirds with an electronic limited slip differential that can split up engine power at each wheel individually, but we never figured out why the XTS come standard with Brembo front brakes. We found no faults in the XTS' stopping distance, but at the same time, we saw no reason for the added cost either *– yes, these brakes are standard on all cars, but replacement Brembo pads are never cheap. The only other grumble we could muster about the driving dynamic of the XTS was the choice to stick with a conventional hydraulic steering system rather than going to a smoother, more efficient electric system, especially for lower speed turns where the steering could feel a little jerky at times. As many small gripes that we had with the car, however, there's no question that the XTS is a V8 and nine-speed automatic transmission from being a true game-changer for Cadillac, even with its front-wheel-drive platform.


Another downside of the XTS is its price, even though the base model's $44,075 MSRP isn't where the sticker shock lies. It's when you start tacking on options and packages that things get out of control. Our all-wheel-drive Platinum Collection tester topped out at $62,300, which, for that kind of money, is priced dangerously close to sportier, albeit smaller, sedans like the Jaguar XF and Lexus GS. Buyers looking for luxury and the latest technology, however, will likely not make the mistake of associating the XTS with those similarly priced sport sedans. Considering its chassis and driving dynamics, it's still playing in the mid-luxury sandbox with the likes of the Lincoln MKS, Volvo S80 and Lexus ES.

What you're getting for that as-tested price is a fully loaded sedan that finally gives Cadillac some momentum to swing back into the luxury car fight. Once the world standard for luxury and quality, Cadillac got there using vehicles with revered names such as Fleetwood, Deville and ElDorado, but today the way back to relevance starts with a vehicle given an anonymous, place-holding name: XTS. It's the Cadillac of stopgaps.

http://www.autoblog.com/2013/01/30/2...-review-video/
Hoovey689 is offline  
Old 01-30-13, 11:45 AM
  #2  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,518
Received 83 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

I haven't seen or driven a XTS, so I can't directly comment. (I hope to see one this weekend at the D.C. Auto Show, and do a short test-drive if GM has a circuit set up outside the building in the city streets like they did a couple of years ago). But, just from what the article says, Consumer Reports agrees with the criticism of the hard-to-use CUE system, but does not agree with the assessment of a soft ride. CR criticized the XTS they reviewed for a too-harsh ride for a luxury-flagship, even with the Maagna-Ride system. Probably not surprising, considering that Cadillac used stiffer underpinnings and lower-profile tires on this car than they did on the DTS it replaces. Lincoln, of course, did the same thing with the Town-Car-to-MKS conversion...and got the same criticism from CR.

In the XTS's favor, though (and I can only judge from pictures) the dash and interior does seem a cut above the DTS...and the XTS has the AWD option that the DTS never got.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 01-30-13, 01:59 PM
  #3  
Hoovey689
Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 42,283
Received 122 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

I've seen a few on the road here in Cali. It's big, but certainly not a replacement for a proper Flagship
Hoovey689 is offline  
Old 01-30-13, 03:23 PM
  #4  
spwolf
Lexus Champion
 
spwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 19,833
Received 104 Likes on 75 Posts
Default

did AB just write how they wanted electric steering over hydraulic? That would be a first... oh wait, its AB.
spwolf is online now  
Old 01-31-13, 06:19 AM
  #5  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 73,687
Received 2,097 Likes on 1,360 Posts
Default

Haven't been in one, but I think this is a great car if you want a really comfortable roomy sedan.
bitkahuna is online now  
Old 01-31-13, 07:01 AM
  #6  
bagwell
Lexus Champion
 
bagwell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Woodlands, TX
Posts: 11,205
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

illuminated door handles.....cool

bagwell is offline  
Old 01-31-13, 07:54 AM
  #7  
Kira X
美少女戦士セーラームーン

iTrader: (24)
 
Kira X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 東京都
Posts: 11,186
Received 408 Likes on 336 Posts
Default

These new Cadillac s are awesome. I got to drive a brand new ATS a few days ago and I loved it. I can't wait to get a chance to check out the XTS.
Kira X is offline  
Old 01-31-13, 09:11 AM
  #8  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,518
Received 83 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
Haven't been in one, but I think this is a great car if you want a really comfortable roomy sedan.
Comfortable? That's one of the things Consumer Reports criticized about it....the suspension/tires, even with Magna-Ride, were too firm for rough roads. Same with its arch-rival.....the Lincoln MKS.

I myself, though, as stated above, will withhold judgement on the ride until I have driven it.....but I have driven and reviewed a Lincoln MKS, and wasn't very impresssed.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 01-31-13, 12:49 PM
  #9  
Hoovey689
Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 42,283
Received 122 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
Comfortable? That's one of the things Consumer Reports criticized about it....the suspension/tires, even with Magna-Ride, were too firm for rough roads. Same with its arch-rival.....the Lincoln MKS.

I myself, though, as stated above, will withhold judgement on the ride until I have driven it.....but I have driven and reviewed a Lincoln MKS, and wasn't very impresssed.
I think with Lincoln and Cadillac they are abandoning those cushy rides for something the younger generation wants. Its it right? Perhaps to them it just makes more business case to try and sway potential buyers of German or Asian makes.
Hoovey689 is offline  
Old 01-31-13, 01:51 PM
  #10  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,518
Received 83 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hoovey2411
I think with Lincoln and Cadillac they are abandoning those cushy rides for something the younger generation wants. Its it right? Perhaps to them it just makes more business case to try and sway potential buyers of German or Asian makes.
Even though their riding comfort is not as plush as before, one thing I will give most of today's Cadillacs and Lincolns credit for (and it is long overdue), is the AWD options for bad weather that the soft-riding Town Cars and DTS/DeVilles never got.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 01-31-13, 02:23 PM
  #11  
Hoovey689
Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 42,283
Received 122 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
Even though their riding comfort is not as plush as before, one thing I will give most of today's Cadillacs and Lincolns credit for (and it is long overdue), is the AWD options for bad weather that the soft-riding Town Cars and DTS/DeVilles never got.
Amen to that + the Fusion and Legacy being the only two (not Altima, Accord, Camry, Malibu, Mazda6, Passat, Galant, Avenger) offer it in their segment.
Hoovey689 is offline  
Old 08-11-14, 08:56 PM
  #12  
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Toys4RJill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ON/NY
Posts: 30,476
Received 62 Likes on 53 Posts
Default

Colleague if mine drove me about 300 miles today on a business trip to Cleveland Ohio.

Love, love, love this car. My friends car was the V Sport and stickered for $73k US and this thing is a work of art.

I have said on here before (I think) that I like the interior of the XTS better than Lexus. IMO, the interior of the XTS is the best Cadillac interior ever fitted into a Cadillac.

The ride was so smooth and quiet on the highway. The power of the car was awesome. Brembo brakes are cool.

The ultraroof was awesome. I had no problems with Cadillac CUE. The seats are ultra comfortable. The guage cluster was a work of art.

Overall, I was super impressed. So impressed that if I were to request a car to cross the US or Canada, I would probably request the XTS Vsport platinum.
Toys4RJill is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hoovey689
Car Chat
53
01-22-14 11:26 AM
Hoovey689
Car Chat
23
10-11-13 02:16 PM
Hoovey689
Car Chat
1
06-12-13 08:44 PM
Hoovey689
Car Chat
2
03-01-13 09:13 AM
Hoovey689
Car Chat
2
12-17-12 08:48 PM



Quick Reply: Review: 2013 Cadillac XTS



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:28 AM.