Notices
Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Innova

BMW turbo being tested

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 13, 2005 | 07:39 AM
  #1  
Incendiary's Avatar
Incendiary
Thread Starter
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,509
Likes: 0
From: MD
Default BMW turbo being tested

http://www.germancarfans.com/spyphot...id/6051013.001



Article and photo not very exciting, but the big news is it's one step closer to production reality. Many are speculating the 335i will be like the S4, while the M3 will be RS4 level. I wonder if MB will respond...
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2005 | 08:30 AM
  #2  
Leets's Avatar
Leets
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,029
Likes: 1
From: California
Default

A turbo Bimmer? But the Bavarians are masters of the N/A arts... it's almost a cop out for them to go turbo with the new engine families.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2005 | 08:38 AM
  #3  
Bercasio's Avatar
Bercasio
Pole Position
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
From: Toronto/Vancouver Canada
Default

Uh-ohh, the new BMW engine families has run into a brick wall, what they have created and maybe realized they cannot produce as much power N/A as they thought, and now they have to resort in a bit of "Turbo-ade", either this is something new or it is a big, but silent OOOOPSSS!!
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2005 | 08:40 AM
  #4  
Incendiary's Avatar
Incendiary
Thread Starter
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,509
Likes: 0
From: MD
Default

Considering they're able to get 100 hp/L (4.0L V8 producing 400 hp, 5.0L V10 producing 500 hp), I don't think BMW is really hurting for N/A engine engineering skills...
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2005 | 08:56 AM
  #5  
GFerg's Avatar
GFerg
Speaks French in Russian
CL Folding 25,000
20 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 13,397
Likes: 100
From: What is G?
Default

I would assume that adding a turbo to the existing engine is a cheaper alternative than tuning the N/A engine for compareable power gains. Either way, I cant wait till this engine hits the market.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2005 | 09:05 AM
  #6  
LeXuSrAcIn's Avatar
LeXuSrAcIn
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,231
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default

Wonder how turbo BMW reliability will be?
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2005 | 09:42 AM
  #7  
mmarshall's Avatar
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 94,223
Likes: 221
From: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Default

Originally Posted by Incendiary
Considering they're able to get 100 hp/L (4.0L V8 producing 400 hp, 5.0L V10 producing 500 hp), I don't think BMW is really hurting for N/A engine engineering skills...
Depends on your needs and driving style. HP doesn't necessarily mean torque......Honda has proved that. HP is most useful for high speed cruising and is more a indicator of potential top speed....In other words, it measures the amount of power the engine needs to overcome air resistance at high speeds. This, of course, comes in more handy on German Autobahns ( a BMW's natural home ) than it does under typical American driving conditions.

Here in America people talk about wanting HP when what they really want is TORQUE.....the amount of twisting force the engine produces at the crankshaft's output. Torque is what give you acceleration...it is what pushes you back in the seat while accelerating, not HP. In addition, the torque curve usually peaks at a much lower RPM than HP, ( again, some Honda and Toyota VTEC motors excepted ) which is the way the majority of Americans drive.

I don't know this to be a fact, but my guess is that BMW may going to turbos to keep power output high in an age of much higher fuel costs when engine displacement may have to be limited. European countries are notorious for that...taxing larger engines. Having a small turbo engine rather than a large N/A one can give you the best of both worlds....power when you want it and economy when you don't.t

Last edited by mmarshall; Oct 13, 2005 at 09:46 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2005 | 09:45 AM
  #8  
Incendiary's Avatar
Incendiary
Thread Starter
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,509
Likes: 0
From: MD
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
Depends on your needs and driving style. HP doesn't necessarily mean torque......Honda has proved that. HP is most useful for high speed cruising and is more a indicator of potential top speed....In other words, it measures the amount of power the engine needs to overcome air resistance at high speeds. This, of course, comes in more handy on German Autobahns ( a BMW's natural home ) than it does under typical American driving conditions.

Here in America people talk about wanting HP when what they really want is TORQUE.....the amount of twisting force the engine produces at the crankshaft's output. Torque is what give you acceleration...it is what pushes you back in the seat while accelerating, not HP. In addition, the torque curve usually peaks at a much lower RPM than HP, ( again, some Honda and Toyota VTEC motors excepted ) which is the way the majority of Americans drive.
Sure, and correct me if I'm wrong, but hp and torque are mathematically linked, aren't they? In general, more hp will give you more torque. In general.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2005 | 09:49 AM
  #9  
mmarshall's Avatar
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 94,223
Likes: 221
From: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Default

Originally Posted by Incendiary
Sure, and correct me if I'm wrong, but hp and torque are mathematically linked, aren't they? In general, more hp will give you more torque. In general.
Again, it depends, on engine design. Honda 4-cylinder engines ( famous for this ) produce lots of high-RPM horsepower for their size but very little torque...especially at low RPM's. Diesels are just the opposite.....very low-RPM engines with lots of low RPM torque but very little HP..and a low redline at that.

BTW...the current 4-cylinder in the Honda CRV is noted for being the first Honda 4 with torque to equal HP ....160
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2005 | 10:29 AM
  #10  
Faraaz23's Avatar
Faraaz23
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,323
Likes: 0
From: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Default

Originally Posted by Incendiary
Sure, and correct me if I'm wrong, but hp and torque are mathematically linked, aren't they? In general, more hp will give you more torque. In general.
Yea, I wanna say the formula is (tq*rpm)/5250 or something close to that. More hp isn't neccessarily more torque. Suppose you have 100 lb/ft of tq available at 2,000 rpm, and that same 100 available at 3400rpms, the latter option will give you higher hp. Its been a while since i've read over this stuff, so someone jump in and correct me if I'm wrong.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2005 | 10:33 AM
  #11  
O. L. T.'s Avatar
O. L. T.
Keeper of the light
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 34,122
Likes: 483
From: My little world
Default

BMW has always made HP numbers that are lower, and absolutely amazing performance from those lower numbers. BMW HP has a little something special in it. It's very potent.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2005 | 11:31 AM
  #12  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Thanks, we've talked bout this. BMW already turbos its DIESAL cars in Europe. B/C of the difference between M cars and the top of the line non M cars, they said awhile back they have to use F/I to make the gap smaller.

The 335 should be first with the 535, the 3.0 engine with a turbo, good for about 320-330 hp I hear.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2005 | 03:05 PM
  #13  
whoster's Avatar
whoster
Lexus Test Driver
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 5,350
Likes: 1
From: Inside
Default

yeah...

the new BMW 535d

is a twin turbo.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2005 | 03:44 PM
  #14  
TheRupp's Avatar
TheRupp
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,788
Likes: 3
From: Illinois
Default

Originally Posted by Leets
A turbo Bimmer? But the Bavarians are masters of the N/A arts... it's almost a cop out for them to go turbo with the new engine families.
Yeah, I agree. Turbo's were cool in the 80's and 90's. Now it's all about NA.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2005 | 03:50 PM
  #15  
Incendiary's Avatar
Incendiary
Thread Starter
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,509
Likes: 0
From: MD
Default

Originally Posted by TheRupp
Yeah, I agree. Turbo's were cool in the 80's and 90's. Now it's all about NA.
Come on, Rupp. If Lexus came out with a twin turbo for the IS or GS, I bet you'd cream your pants like an 8th grade boy looking at his first issue of Playboy.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:10 AM.