Notices
Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Innova

Lexus Benchmarking German Car Body Rigidity

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 30, 2024 | 02:16 AM
  #16  
Motorola's Avatar
Motorola
Thread Starter
Lexus Test Driver
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
 
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 5,482
Likes: 89
From: N/A
Default

Originally Posted by 703
The $1b investment in 1986 for the LS is only about $2.6b in today’s dollars. If Lexus spend the same amount every 10 years on the same principals and discipline as the LS, they would be a market leader in the luxury segment.

Instead, Lexus is just a poor cousin of Toyota and gets minimal benefit from the $10b a year R&D - towards relentless pursuit of cutting production costs.
$2.6 billion is insane money for any car development project. Here's what else took $2.6 billion to develop - the Bugatti Veyron ($1.6 billion when it came out in 2005). The Tesla Model S, which was essentially made from scratch, took $2.1 billion to develop ($1.5 billion in 2011 dollars). Meanwhile Lexus's most expensive project since the LS400, the LFA, cost $800 million in 2010 dollars which is only $1.2 billion in today's money. All of these aforementioned cars also took huge losses per unit sold.

The LS400 wasn't just an expensive car to develop, it's a demonstration of just how insane Japan's economy was at the time when it was actually profitable despite selling at half the price of the S-Class. Such circumstances will never happen again in our living history for Japan or any other country.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2024 | 12:01 PM
  #17  
Stroock639's Avatar
Stroock639
Lexus Test Driver
10 Year Member
Community Builder
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 6,275
Likes: 482
From: Long Island
Default

Originally Posted by Motorola
$2.6 billion is insane money for any car development project. Here's what else took $2.6 billion to develop - the Bugatti Veyron ($1.6 billion when it came out in 2005). The Tesla Model S, which was essentially made from scratch, took $2.1 billion to develop ($1.5 billion in 2011 dollars). Meanwhile Lexus's most expensive project since the LS400, the LFA, cost $800 million in 2010 dollars which is only $1.2 billion in today's money. All of these aforementioned cars also took huge losses per unit sold.

The LS400 wasn't just an expensive car to develop, it's a demonstration of just how insane Japan's economy was at the time when it was actually profitable despite selling at half the price of the S-Class. Such circumstances will never happen again in our living history for Japan or any other country.
$2.6 billion also seemed to get put to better use by 80s/90s toyota, like i'd always championed toyota for being particularly efficient and making the most of its spending but idk about that anymore
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2024 | 04:07 PM
  #18  
rosskoss's Avatar
rosskoss
Advanced
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 677
Likes: 1
From: US
Default

I can't believe I'm reading this. Engineers have 'discovered a lack of body rigidity'?

That's like 101 - affects cabin noise, suspension tuning, handling, ride and comfort, how well your interior joints/fastenings etc. hold up over time - like one of the most fundamental things.

How're they just 'discovering' this in 2024?! Where have they been all these years? I don't get it.

A rigid chassis makes all the difference in the world (drive a lower-end convertible if you don't believe me). So crazy this news...
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2024 | 04:29 PM
  #19  
Striker223's Avatar
Striker223
Lexus Champion
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 18,346
Likes: 1,795
From: Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by rosskoss
I can't believe I'm reading this. Engineers have 'discovered a lack of body rigidity'?

That's like 101 - affects cabin noise, suspension tuning, handling, ride and comfort, how well your interior joints/fastenings etc. hold up over time - like one of the most fundamental things.

How're they just 'discovering' this in 2024?! Where have they been all these years? I don't get it.

A rigid chassis makes all the difference in the world (drive a lower-end convertible if you don't believe me). So crazy this news...
Its been on the back burner because Toyota/Lexus owners are myopic enough to drive a suv from 2006 all the way through 2023 with no changes and fork over 60k+ every 4 years for an unchanged version of the same thing. If people buy anyway why change?
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2024 | 05:24 PM
  #20  
703's Avatar
703
Lead Lap
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 4,539
Likes: 936
Default

Originally Posted by Striker223
Its been on the back burner because Toyota/Lexus owners are myopic enough to drive a suv from 2006 all the way through 2023 with no changes and fork over 60k+ every 4 years for an unchanged version of the same thing. If people buy anyway why change?
That's better than changing for changes sake. Now even those long time Lexus owners are reluctant to stay with the brand.

There has been plenty of rigidity improvements from 2010 to 2013 and from 2016 to 2020 RXs. Driven them all and I can tell.

Last edited by 703; Aug 30, 2024 at 05:56 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2024 | 06:44 PM
  #21  
FrankReynoldsCPA's Avatar
FrankReynoldsCPA
Lexus Test Driver
15 Year Member
Community Influencer
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 8,398
Likes: 362
From: Las Vegas
Default

Originally Posted by Striker223
Its been on the back burner because Toyota/Lexus owners are myopic enough to drive a suv from 2006 all the way through 2023 with no changes and fork over 60k+ every 4 years for an unchanged version of the same thing. If people buy anyway why change?
Amazes me people kept going back over and over for this melatonin inspired interior

Reply
Old Aug 30, 2024 | 11:29 PM
  #22  
Motorola's Avatar
Motorola
Thread Starter
Lexus Test Driver
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
 
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 5,482
Likes: 89
From: N/A
Default

Originally Posted by Stroock639
$2.6 billion also seemed to get put to better use by 80s/90s toyota, like i'd always championed toyota for being particularly efficient and making the most of its spending but idk about that anymore
You're spot on. I wonder how many projects got scrapped thanks to Akio blowing $5 billion on a personal test track for him to play boy racer on.

Last edited by Motorola; Aug 30, 2024 at 11:43 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2024 | 01:41 AM
  #23  
703's Avatar
703
Lead Lap
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 4,539
Likes: 936
Default

Originally Posted by Stroock639
$2.6 billion also seemed to get put to better use by 80s/90s toyota, like i'd always championed toyota for being particularly efficient and making the most of its spending but idk about that anymore
Yep, and they even have spare change to do this:





Reply
Old Aug 31, 2024 | 03:24 AM
  #24  
Bob04's Avatar
Bob04
Lead Lap
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,542
Likes: 664
From: SC
Default

Marketing has taken a huge hit in the last 10 years too.

From this smokeshow...



To this dude.



Their cars aren't the only place they should have noticed a dramatic loss of rigidity.


Reply
Old Aug 31, 2024 | 03:50 AM
  #25  
Striker223's Avatar
Striker223
Lexus Champion
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 18,346
Likes: 1,795
From: Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by 703
That's better than changing for changes sake. Now even those long time Lexus owners are reluctant to stay with the brand.

There has been plenty of rigidity improvements from 2010 to 2013 and from 2016 to 2020 RXs. Driven them all and I can tell.
Yeah but they should actually make meaningful improvments over time, the difference from a 2010 RX to a 2020 is minimal at best and only like 12% stiffer and a wet noodle vs contemporaries. That's not a hard and fast BAD thing though, a softer structure can lend a particular character to a car I guess......I like the BOF feel in a truck or SUV myself.
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2024 | 10:53 AM
  #26  
Stroock639's Avatar
Stroock639
Lexus Test Driver
10 Year Member
Community Builder
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 6,275
Likes: 482
From: Long Island
Default

Originally Posted by Bob04
Their cars aren't the only place they should have noticed a dramatic loss of rigidity.


ha haaaaaa yes! that RX ad pretty much caused me an instant lack of rigidity
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2024 | 12:22 PM
  #27  
Toys4RJill's Avatar
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 35,480
Likes: 384
From: ON/NY
Default

Originally Posted by 703
Lexus should benchmark their new cars against the original LS
You are living in a strange distorted past.

Originally Posted by 703
see all the areas they have regressed on over the last 20 years.
Absurd Lexus now offers sedan awd. Superior fuel economy. Better towing capabilities with their BOF trucks. LS400 had a stupid timing belt (VW still uses them) why don’t we NOT go back to that stupidity. New Lexus models look better than the LS era which were boring and dull.

I will say Lexus should go back to the SC430 design. Way better looking than the LC (inside and out). … but that dumb timing belt..and no AWD on the LC500
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2024 | 01:22 PM
  #28  
FrankReynoldsCPA's Avatar
FrankReynoldsCPA
Lexus Test Driver
15 Year Member
Community Influencer
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 8,398
Likes: 362
From: Las Vegas
Default

I have zero desire to go back to an LS400. It was good for its time. It's not relevant in 2024.
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2024 | 01:49 PM
  #29  
703's Avatar
703
Lead Lap
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 4,539
Likes: 936
Default

Originally Posted by Toys4RJill
You are living in a strange distorted past.



Absurd Lexus now offers sedan awd. Superior fuel economy. Better towing capabilities with their BOF trucks. LS400 had a stupid timing belt (VW still uses them) why don’t we NOT go back to that stupidity. New Lexus models look better than the LS era which were boring and dull.

I will say Lexus should go back to the SC430 design. Way better looking than the LC (inside and out). … but that dumb timing belt..and no AWD on the LC500
You are completely missing the point. Benchmarking is about areas that it can improve on, not areas that it is already better at.

Just like Lexus benchmarked BMWs chassis for rigidity , not their engines for unreliability.

what is the big deal about a belt? Most people don’t even need to change the timing belt in their life time of ownership, and it’s actually quieter.

Sc430 was a fail. Had the worse reviews ever, wasn’t a proper replacement for the Sc400.
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2024 | 01:57 PM
  #30  
703's Avatar
703
Lead Lap
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 4,539
Likes: 936
Default

Originally Posted by Bob04
Marketing has taken a huge hit in the last 10 years too.

From this smokeshow...

To this dude.

Their cars aren't the only place they should have noticed a dramatic loss of rigidity.
I think that’s sums it all up. From Lexus who were proud of their flagships, to have nothing to show but jumping on the bandwagon social trends to be relevant.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:08 AM.