RS-R downs F-sport vs. non F-sport?
#1
Driver School Candidate
Thread Starter
RS-R downs F-sport vs. non F-sport?
Is there really any difference between RS-R downs for the F-sport models and the downs for the non F-sport models? According to RS-R's chart, the springs for the non F-sport model gives significantly less drop than the springs for the F-sport model.
I have a non F-sport. Would there be any problems if I got the downs for the F-sport model? Would they fit?
Thanks!
I have a non F-sport. Would there be any problems if I got the downs for the F-sport model? Would they fit?
Thanks!
#2
Is there really any difference between RS-R downs for the F-sport models and the downs for the non F-sport models? According to RS-R's chart, the springs for the non F-sport model gives significantly less drop than the springs for the F-sport model.
I have a non F-sport. Would there be any problems if I got the downs for the F-sport model? Would they fit?
Thanks!
I have a non F-sport. Would there be any problems if I got the downs for the F-sport model? Would they fit?
Thanks!
#3
Your #1 Lexus Vendor
iTrader: (8)
Nope, you'd be fine! The regular RSR down springs for your car!
-Josh
-Josh
__________________
Your #1 Dealer for Aftermarket Performance Products
Orange County, CA
Email: info@merakiautoworks.com
Text/Call: 213 394 2886
Website: www.MerakiAutoworks.com
Your #1 Dealer for Aftermarket Performance Products
Orange County, CA
Email: info@merakiautoworks.com
Text/Call: 213 394 2886
Website: www.MerakiAutoworks.com
#4
Driver School Candidate
Thread Starter
Follow-up question, some of their springs are listed as compatible with years from 2013-09.2016 and some are from 10.2016 and onward. Is there really any difference? I got the impression that there's only cosmetic differences after the facelift?
Edit: The rear spring rate is listed as 8.67kg/mm for the older models and 8.98kg/mm for the newer ones. Do those 0,31kg/mm matter all that much?
Last edited by Kirtap; 03-01-19 at 12:19 AM.
#5
Former Sponsor
Thanks Josh! I wonder why they list them separately....
Follow-up question, some of their springs are listed as compatible with years from 2013-09.2016 and some are from 10.2016 and onward. Is there really any difference? I got the impression that there's only cosmetic differences after the facelift?
Edit: The rear spring rate is listed as 8.67kg/mm for the older models and 8.98kg/mm for the newer ones. Do those 0,31kg/mm matter all that much?
Follow-up question, some of their springs are listed as compatible with years from 2013-09.2016 and some are from 10.2016 and onward. Is there really any difference? I got the impression that there's only cosmetic differences after the facelift?
Edit: The rear spring rate is listed as 8.67kg/mm for the older models and 8.98kg/mm for the newer ones. Do those 0,31kg/mm matter all that much?
#6
Driver School Candidate
Thread Starter
#7
It's hard to really compare springs simply by specifications because spring rate and length are only two attributes. There's also the diameter of the coils and the composition of the coils itself as well as other factors. Even within the RS-R models, we might expect that they'd use the same base materials but their spring rates do not directly correspond with their published drop specifications, which is why a number of us are essentially experimenting to find out what works in real life.
Trending Topics
#8
Your #1 Lexus Vendor
iTrader: (8)
Theres probably some added weight or dropped weight somewhere which is why they're different.
-Josh
-Josh
__________________
Your #1 Dealer for Aftermarket Performance Products
Orange County, CA
Email: info@merakiautoworks.com
Text/Call: 213 394 2886
Website: www.MerakiAutoworks.com
Your #1 Dealer for Aftermarket Performance Products
Orange County, CA
Email: info@merakiautoworks.com
Text/Call: 213 394 2886
Website: www.MerakiAutoworks.com
#9
Driver School Candidate
Thread Starter
It's hard to really compare springs simply by specifications because spring rate and length are only two attributes. There's also the diameter of the coils and the composition of the coils itself as well as other factors. Even within the RS-R models, we might expect that they'd use the same base materials but their spring rates do not directly correspond with their published drop specifications, which is why a number of us are essentially experimenting to find out what works in real life.
Regardless what they say I feel like I might do just that, experiment and see what works in real life.
#10
Thank you! This is the kind of reply I wanted. I've been in contact with RS-R USA and they in their turn directed me to their european vendors. I hope to hear from them soon regarding wether or not the springs for the F-sport 300h will work on my non F-sport.
Regardless what they say I feel like I might do just that, experiment and see what works in real life.
Regardless what they say I feel like I might do just that, experiment and see what works in real life.
#13
Driver School Candidate
Thread Starter
Some of the research we've done is on parts sites like https://www.mylparts.com/. There, you can compare suspension parts of different models to see the part numbers and determine if they're the same. In some cases, the springs were different between AWD and RWD, and in other cases there were differences between F-Sport and non. The main thing would be whether they physically fit, which from 2014-2017 at least they all seem to across the board.
#14
Driver School Candidate
Thread Starter
So after a few weeks of research, I finally got this statement from RS-R Japan:
T195D and T195TD is for IS300h AVE30 (F sport) but R&D said it would fit on non F sport model.But we haven't tried this yet so drop height might differ from the data we provide on our Item research +5mm or -5mm front and rear.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post