Suspension and Brakes Springs, shocks, coilovers, sways, braces, brakes, etc.

Two straight sets of front tires destroyed by negative camber

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-04-10, 01:15 PM
  #16  
GSteg
Rookie
iTrader: (15)
 
GSteg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 16,017
Likes: 0
Received 78 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

The dealers will install F-sport suspension and performance parts, but try getting an alignment from them. The dealer will still resort to whatever the Hunter machine tells them whether you're on stock or F-sport springs
Old 06-04-10, 02:49 PM
  #17  
Ice350
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Ice350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 11,349
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

I thought the 2IS was just like the 3GS in that it does not come with camber adjustment from the factory. The camber is set for stock height and can't be adjusted when lowered. All of us 3GS owners are dealing with this issue but we don't complain. If you lower your car there will be negative camber that will prematurely wear out the inner side of the front tires.
About 20K miles is what you can expect with a lowered 3GS and I thought 2IS. That's why so many guys buy cheap tires.
The rears last longer but expect to buy fronts more often...if you want that look we love so much.
Old 06-04-10, 03:28 PM
  #18  
ldc
Lexus Test Driver
 
ldc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: 80808
Posts: 972
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

Do you have pics of your cars showing the wheel slanting?
Old 06-04-10, 05:25 PM
  #19  
RocketGuy3
Lexus Test Driver
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
RocketGuy3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: TX
Posts: 1,564
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I don't think 1.5 degrees is enough to show up in a picture. But the wear issues are pretty apparent.

Originally Posted by Ice350
I thought the 2IS was just like the 3GS in that it does not come with camber adjustment from the factory. The camber is set for stock height and can't be adjusted when lowered. All of us 3GS owners are dealing with this issue but we don't complain. If you lower your car there will be negative camber that will prematurely wear out the inner side of the front tires.
About 20K miles is what you can expect with a lowered 3GS and I thought 2IS. That's why so many guys buy cheap tires.
The rears last longer but expect to buy fronts more often...if you want that look we love so much.
If I continue to face this problem, I think I would try to get more life out of my tires by swapping (re-mounting) them left-to-right every 10K miles or so. I think that could get me a whole lot more life out of my tires. Have you tried that?
Old 06-04-10, 08:55 PM
  #20  
Ice350
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Ice350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 11,349
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RocketGuy3
I don't think 1.5 degrees is enough to show up in a picture. But the wear issues are pretty apparent.


If I continue to face this problem, I think I would try to get more life out of my tires by swapping (re-mounting) them left-to-right every 10K miles or so. I think that could get me a whole lot more life out of my tires. Have you tried that?
Naw....I do about 8K miles a year. If I get 20K out of the tires that's over 2 years. That's good enough for me.
Old 06-08-10, 11:24 AM
  #21  
RocketGuy3
Lexus Test Driver
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
RocketGuy3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: TX
Posts: 1,564
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Just to be sure, I'm guessing the same advice about adding toe in applies to the rear wheels, too, if I am seeing the same problem back there?

(For the record, my specs in the rear are -2.1 camber left, -1.8 right, and .24 total toe, and I am seeing some noticeable wear on the inside of my front tires after about 10K.)
Old 06-08-10, 05:49 PM
  #22  
lobuxracer
Tech Info Resource

iTrader: (2)
 
lobuxracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Georgia
Posts: 22,207
Received 3,849 Likes on 2,334 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RocketGuy3
Just to be sure, I'm guessing the same advice about adding toe in applies to the rear wheels, too, if I am seeing the same problem back there?

(For the record, my specs in the rear are -2.1 camber left, -1.8 right, and .24 total toe, and I am seeing some noticeable wear on the inside of my front tires after about 10K.)
Front inside edge wear is toe out. Rear inside edge wear is toe in. Toe out in front helps the car turn in better. Toe in at the rear reduces understeer and helps the car turn. So, if the rear is wearing on the inside edges, you need less toe in which is the exact opposite of what you do for the front.
Old 06-08-10, 11:32 PM
  #23  
RocketGuy3
Lexus Test Driver
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
RocketGuy3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: TX
Posts: 1,564
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Err... I meant to say I'm seeing wear on the inside of my *rear* tires after about 10K, but hopefully context clues made that clear.

Anyways, thanks. I should have learned some of this from Forza by now.

Is the convention for the rear wheels the same as the front wheels in that a positive toe angle represents toe in?
Old 06-09-10, 09:41 PM
  #24  
lobuxracer
Tech Info Resource

iTrader: (2)
 
lobuxracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Georgia
Posts: 22,207
Received 3,849 Likes on 2,334 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RocketGuy3
Err... I meant to say I'm seeing wear on the inside of my *rear* tires after about 10K, but hopefully context clues made that clear.

Anyways, thanks. I should have learned some of this from Forza by now.

Is the convention for the rear wheels the same as the front wheels in that a positive toe angle represents toe in?
AFAIK. I never use angular measurements, I always use linear. It's a lot less complicated. The angular measurements on the machines typically fail to account for the actual tire diameter, so you can be dead on the numbers and still have problems if you're on non-standard tires. Just another reason to have someone who actually understands suspension geometry setting up your chassis instead of someone depending on the lights going green.
Old 06-13-10, 01:14 PM
  #25  
sinister2c
Racer
 
sinister2c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: fl
Posts: 1,769
Received 177 Likes on 139 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lobuxracer
AFAIK. I never use angular measurements, I always use linear. It's a lot less complicated. The angular measurements on the machines typically fail to account for the actual tire diameter, so you can be dead on the numbers and still have problems if you're on non-standard tires. Just another reason to have someone who actually understands suspension geometry setting up your chassis instead of someone depending on the lights going green.
So whats your recommendation for the 2IS?

Is there a setting on the Hunter machines that we should tell the alignment guy to put it on to read in distance and not angle?

I might have them adjust to the edge of the green for toe in on the front and the edge of toe out on the rear to see if that helps the inner tire wear.

I am also going to do the front SPC camber kit before the alignment too.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ray123
VIP Style
9
08-05-11 12:33 PM
azkaty
SC430 - 2nd Gen (2001-2010)
12
08-03-10 08:59 PM
gman44116
GS - 2nd Gen (1998-2005)
1
01-04-10 08:32 PM
bfigard
SC430 - 2nd Gen (2001-2010)
5
04-09-07 09:46 PM
SPEED&ECO.
IS - 2nd Gen (2006-2013)
9
01-28-07 02:40 PM



Quick Reply: Two straight sets of front tires destroyed by negative camber



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:49 PM.