Tire and Wheel Protection Plan: your experience.
I could go on a long diatribe about the mathematics behind the cost of the plan, but the simple version is that the average driver isn't going to burn up a greater cost to the underwriter than the actual premium. If you ever do some serious damage to your wheels/tires, it'll cost you the same, or less, as the plan itself to repair/replace. How many times do you honestly expect this will even happen over the lifetime of your vehicle? My guess is once, at most (if at all).
Tires blow and they can be replaced for a fraction of the cost of the insurance. If there were a lower threshold to replace the rims, I'd say go for it. But the fine print will undoubtedly indicate that so long as the rims can hold air, they won't be replaced. That's the key distinction. I guess don't drive over a hole in the ground and you'll be fine, but if you're ever in some serious trouble to the point where you need a number of wheels and tires replaced, it's likely from a serious accident and thus covered by your already-existed auto insurance.
That is to say, any sort of damage that would truly make the insurance worth it will probably result from an actual accident, and you already have that covered.
Also, fun fact, after rebuffing the salesperson repeatedly on my Lexus, they finally caved and took $200 off the package. At that point, I still wasn't interested (and they knew it), so I lowballed them ever further, to a price that I thought was fair. They got so desperate that when I brought up the fine print (about "holding air"), they said if that happens to "come talk to them" and that they'd take care of it. I damn near fell out of my chair and spit coffee out of my nose. I imagine the underwriter would laugh me out of the room if I said it's ok to replace the wheels over a slight bend just because my salesperson said so.
They weren't interested in my fair-value offer.
I don't mean to sound insulting to anyone that has purchased the insurance. Just so you know, I only learned all this the hard way, on another vehicle. I wasn't interested then, either, but I was younger and less resistant to their mercenary sales tactics.
It's good to have peace of mind, and if it makes you happy, go for it. I just pray that in the event you actually need to use the insurance, you aren't completely stonewalled. Dealers love to repair road rash. It hardly costs them anything.
Just wait until you decide you'd like a new rim....
Like all things in life, YMMV.
just make it part of the deal when buying the car, i gave them a horrible time by saying that i was torn between my Lexus and an Acura TLX. I toyed quite a while so they just gave in and gave me the protection, protex, and tints for free even though they can charge ridiculous amounts for it.
(I would’ve done tints and protex outside of the dealer at a lower cost anyways, but giving it for free? Sure)
just make it part of the deal when buying the car, i gave them a horrible time by saying that i was torn between my Lexus and an Acura TLX. I toyed quite a while so they just gave in and gave me the protection, protex, and tints for free even though they can charge ridiculous amounts for it.
(I would’ve done tints and protex outside of the dealer at a lower cost anyways, but giving it for free? Sure)
However, if your tires are more worn, it might be a problem.
Celebrating Lexus & Toyota from Around the Globe
Let's say you even have to replace all four and the underwriter approves the claim, no questions asked, then sure, in hindsight having the insurance was a good idea. Statistically speaking, however, there's a far better chance you won't be so unlucky as to need total replacement.
Another caveat, though I'm not 100% sure, is that I don't think they cover road debris, so you'd have to run over the world's largest pothole for this sort of damage to happen.
Bottom line, if you've put 10k miles on your tires, eg, and one needs replacement, it seems unlikely they're just going to slap four brand new ones on free of charge.
Let's say you even have to replace all four and the underwriter approves the claim, no questions asked, then sure, in hindsight having the insurance was a good idea. Statistically speaking, however, there's a far better chance you won't be so unlucky as to need total replacement.
Another caveat, though I'm not 100% sure, is that I don't think they cover road debris, so you'd have to run over the world's largest pothole for this sort of damage to happen.
Bottom line, if you've put 10k miles on your tires, eg, and one needs replacement, it seems unlikely they're just going to slap four brand new ones on free of charge.
Let's say you even have to replace all four and the underwriter approves the claim, no questions asked, then sure, in hindsight having the insurance was a good idea. Statistically speaking, however, there's a far better chance you won't be so unlucky as to need total replacement.
Another caveat, though I'm not 100% sure, is that I don't think they cover road debris, so you'd have to run over the world's largest pothole for this sort of damage to happen.
Bottom line, if you've put 10k miles on your tires, eg, and one needs replacement, it seems unlikely they're just going to slap four brand new ones on free of charge.
Let's say you even have to replace all four and the underwriter approves the claim, no questions asked, then sure, in hindsight having the insurance was a good idea. Statistically speaking, however, there's a far better chance you won't be so unlucky as to need total replacement.
Another caveat, though I'm not 100% sure, is that I don't think they cover road debris, so you'd have to run over the world's largest pothole for this sort of damage to happen.
Bottom line, if you've put 10k miles on your tires, eg, and one needs replacement, it seems unlikely they're just going to slap four brand new ones on free of charge.
It's a good idea but can be avoided if the tread depth difference is small.
FYI, it's the underwriter that has to "play ball", aka take a loss.
In all my life, that's never happened.
For sure, if you are the type to rub the curb during parallel parking, however, it will probably pay for itself. In my youth I was a valet, so it's not really a problem for me.
I honestly have far more complaints for when rims/tires start to degrade and result in more NVH at highway speeds (shimmying, eg), which is obv. not covered.
Back to my original point, a majority of drivers are going to lose money on the policy. That's by design, not my opinion. Take Apple Care, for example, when the iPhone was newer. The no-questions-asked-replacement policy used to be a steal. Apple was hemorrhaging money on it for sure. Nowadays, the cost is substantially higher, they're stricter about water damage (as in it's not covered anymore), and it's downright expensive to get the phone replaced. Considering how easy it is to purchase and replace your own screen, iPhone insurance simply isn't worth it anymore.
There are a few exceptions, but I general go by the policy of "always say no" to the offer of insurance. Emphasis on "offer", which is different from the types of insurance we tend to independently seek out.
It's funny, because when they pitched the plan to me, the salesperson said it costs something like $1300 just for one wheel/tire combo. Yes, you read that correctly, over $5k + tax to replace all four, or a little over 10% of the cost of my entire vehicle. I damn near fell out of my chair and knew immediately I was being taken for a sucker. Here's the original thread.
Last edited by nitroracer; Apr 24, 2019 at 11:08 AM.








