Notices
SC - 1st Gen (1992-2000)

Treadstone IS300 manifold 2jz-GE

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 2, 2018 | 02:23 PM
  #1  
zazzn's Avatar
zazzn
Thread Starter
Instructor
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 789
Likes: 16
From: NORCAL/GTA
Default Treadstone IS300 manifold 2jz-GE

Anyone else using the Treadstone GE manifold? I'm just wondering what the biggest turbo housings that will fit without touching the shock tower people have used is?
Was thinking of going s369, but borgs have massive housings. The way the turbo would sit I have a bad feeling that there is no chance it would fit.

Last edited by zazzn; Jan 5, 2018 at 09:50 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2018 | 11:27 AM
  #2  
jayvsyaj's Avatar
jayvsyaj
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default

I'm running it with a ebay copy of a TD06/25G, this a 4" inlet 2.5 out compressor housing and it has MAYBE 1/4" clearance cold side. This is similar to a GT35, almost 60mm inducer.

I think people who dream of running a big turbo and a spool valve with this like the GTE guys are going to have a nightmare.

The waste placement serves only to allow the crossover intake, and forces some tight restrictive bends with little room for a flex section if you want to reintegrate right at the downpipe. With my 4 inch ebay supra downpipe/midpipe i had to extensively modified to use with the Treadstone, it didnt leave room to exit with that 4" pipe, so gentle s-bend screamer pipe for now dumping right in front of where the downpipe meets midpipe.

Bottom line after all the hassle of grinding the mounting holes just to get it to bolt up, and having no option but to custom make ALL pipe work hot AND cold because of the manifold, i cant really recommend it.

I wish i had just swapped a GTE head on it, could have had off the shelf CHEAP options, minor modifications AND a path to big hp later. This manifold is best suited for sub 500hp setups, but is a hard way there.

It is quiet, shouldn't crack and does for better or worst have a oem look. I was happy that the radiated heat was MUCH less with the lower surface area than a tubular design and as i said much smoother sounding, hearing only intake and turbo it sounds like a jet getting ready for take off at spool and them whoosh!
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2018 | 09:45 PM
  #3  
shajbot's Avatar
shajbot
Advanced
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 570
Likes: 39
From: California
Default

This guy has a PT6266 right up against the shock tower so I guess that's the max you can go with this manifold.

http://www.supraforums.com/forum/sho...uot-mild-build.

Reply
Old Feb 10, 2018 | 07:53 AM
  #4  
Bdub215's Avatar
Bdub215
Lead Lap
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 641
Likes: 12
From: Cheltenham, Pennsylvania
Default

Originally Posted by shajbot
This guy has a PT6266 right up against the shock tower so I guess that's the max you can go with this manifold.

http://www.supraforums.com/forum/sho...uot-mild-build.

A S366 is larger.

Reply
Old Feb 10, 2018 | 07:39 PM
  #5  
zazzn's Avatar
zazzn
Thread Starter
Instructor
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 789
Likes: 16
From: NORCAL/GTA
Default

So the 6870 uses the same housing for PT. If it's the SP cover. The 7675 come in a H cover which is 3" but so do all the smaller turbos. I guess the question now does a H cover fit or not. I know the SP does for sure which is what I'm guessing is on that 6262
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2018 | 07:54 PM
  #6  
zazzn's Avatar
zazzn
Thread Starter
Instructor
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 789
Likes: 16
From: NORCAL/GTA
Default

Originally Posted by shajbot
This guy has a PT6266 right up against the shock tower so I guess that's the max you can go with this manifold.

http://www.supraforums.com/forum/sho...uot-mild-build.

Yeah I know Lawrence car well, should have bought it and spent the money on making it nicer. Instead, i bought a nice platform and I'm replicating his build. Was going to have him do all the work, but he moved out of state and it got messy and expensive. Anyways, he had a 6870 towards the end and made 8xx whp.

Here's where he posted all the stuff on CL.

https://www.clublexus.com/forums/bui...ire-build.html
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2018 | 02:20 PM
  #7  
airfed's Avatar
airfed
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
From: USA
Default

I have a 6266 its tight, the 6466 has the same body as the 6266. I doubt the 6870 will fit on the tread stone. I believe 6466 is going to be the highest HP turbo for the GE treadstone manifold and not touch the shock tower.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2018 | 11:52 PM
  #8  
73luxury's Avatar
73luxury
Driver
 
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 56
Likes: 3
From: CA
Default



heres a buddy of mine
Reply
Old May 4, 2018 | 02:10 AM
  #9  
zazzn's Avatar
zazzn
Thread Starter
Instructor
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 789
Likes: 16
From: NORCAL/GTA
Default

Originally Posted by 73luxury
heres a buddy of mine
What size turbo? BTW 6870 will fit because it can have the same sp (small cover) as the 6466 I found out. I ended up going with a GTX3584RS
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2019 | 11:24 PM
  #10  
73luxury's Avatar
73luxury
Driver
 
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 56
Likes: 3
From: CA
Default

Im not exactly sure man
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2019 | 11:25 PM
  #11  
73luxury's Avatar
73luxury
Driver
 
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 56
Likes: 3
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by zazzn
What size turbo? BTW 6870 will fit because it can have the same sp (small cover) as the 6466 I found out. I ended up going with a GTX3584RS
Im not exactly sure man
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Golden95SC
Performance
3
Nov 25, 2018 07:17 PM
imDementeD
SC - 1st Gen (1992-2000)
7
Oct 6, 2010 11:09 AM
tuninghaus
SC - 1st Gen (1992-2000)
5
Jun 5, 2007 03:11 PM
InnoMoto
SC400 / 300 Classifieds
4
Jul 18, 2005 06:08 PM
lexus tuned
Performance
4
Aug 22, 2002 02:26 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:37 AM.