Sc300 or 400?

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Dec 10, 2013 | 05:51 AM

#31

rocky5

Driver

iTrader: (2)

Joined: Oct 2013

Posts: 65

Likes: 0

From: ny

1uz enough said

Dec 11, 2013 | 05:12 AM

#32

Soarer79

Thread Starter

Driver School Candidate

Joined: Nov 2013

Posts: 23

Likes: 0

From: Ny

I thought everyone on this board would go for the 300.

Dec 11, 2013 | 06:53 AM

#33

99rx

Instructor

iTrader: (6)

Joined: Dec 2009

Posts: 817

Likes: 35

From: Florida

Everyone is probably biased to whatever model they are driving. I personally have driven both the 300 and 400 at length and couldn't pass on the 400's smooth engine and timeless performance.

Dec 11, 2013 | 09:03 PM

#34

Soarer79

Thread Starter

Driver School Candidate

Joined: Nov 2013

Posts: 23

Likes: 0

From: Ny

I can def relate to what you are saying. I'm looking from a collectors point of view. I'm looking to put one of these cars away and save it for the long run. Is my 94 sc300 with 37k gonna be worth more than the 92 sc400 with 68. The problem is I like the way both of them feel, but I def have to admit the 400 is a smoother ride and less noisy. But the legendary 2jz motor keeps sucking me back in also. I just feel I cant duplicate that low mileage on the 300. Being in the car business when your an enthusiast is a dangerous thing.