Pole Position
ever since i saw the risky devil mk3, ive loved those cars. heres the thing though, mk3s, from my knowledge, are equal to sc's in motor choices, and they have a lot of suspension options. but they dont have body kits, and if your going for looks, in my opinion, the sc dominates an mk3
Quote:
The SC has the better motors. Both the 1UZ and the 2JZ are big improvements over the 7M-GE and the 7M-GTE. I don't count the 1JZ as it was not available in the states. Originally Posted by scott101
ever since i saw the risky devil mk3, ive loved those cars. heres the thing though, mk3s, from my knowledge, are equal to sc's in motor choices, and they have a lot of suspension options. but they dont have body kits, and if your going for looks, in my opinion, the sc dominates an mk3
As for suspension options, anything that's available for the MKIV Supra is available for the SC. The suspension geometry for both cars is nearly identical. Stock wise, the MK3 Supra could be argued to have a better suspension set up - a MK3 could be had with a LSD and TEMS, much better than the SC's open diff peg leg.
On body kits, there are plenty of body kits available for the MK3. Sadly, about 90% of them look like dog ****.
Pole Position
I think is all about tastes, mk3 with 7m is a no no, with 1jz is more reliable, also parts are hard to get, the Sc is hard on parts to, but the difference it shares tons of stuff with the mk4 platform that is why I keep my SC 1jz.