Notices
SC - 1st Gen (1992-2000)

Engine Brake= Wasting Gas??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 16, 2008 | 11:54 AM
  #1  
scoarer's Avatar
scoarer
Thread Starter
Pole Position
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Default Engine Brake= Wasting Gas??

My friend and I are in and endless debate on whether engine braking wastes gas or not. Anybody have a definative answer for this?
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2008 | 12:04 PM
  #2  
over40driv's Avatar
over40driv
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,650
Likes: 2
From: In
Default

So your downshifting to slow you down which in turn raises RPMs, which takes more fuel. My son used to do it just because he liked to hear the engine rev.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2008 | 12:08 PM
  #3  
Kaydee's Avatar
Kaydee
Hacked CL to become a Mod
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,713
Likes: 9
From: Vancouver >> Hong Kong
Default

revving engine = wasting gas
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2008 | 12:10 PM
  #4  
scoarer's Avatar
scoarer
Thread Starter
Pole Position
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Default

Im on the side that thinks it wastes gas..Any physicists here know how this mechanically works?
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2008 | 12:12 PM
  #5  
Lex-Fiend's Avatar
Lex-Fiend
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,107
Likes: 0
From: Chi-City
Default

It wastes gas, of course, but it slows the car down, meaning your brakes don't work as hard and will last longer, or so I've heard.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2008 | 12:27 PM
  #6  
joewitafro's Avatar
joewitafro
Racer
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,719
Likes: 313
From: Washington
Default

Depends. on my car for example (mk3 supra with maft pro piggyback).. when I downshift and decell, my AFR's spike to 22.3, which means it cut the injectors of their fuel. And actually saves me gas compared to throwing it in neutral and letting the car idle as I brake.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2008 | 12:29 PM
  #7  
dirtydewey's Avatar
dirtydewey
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
Default

Here's some simple logic..... Commercial drivers in their 20,000 pound tractor trailers do this. They drive for a living.
The pennies it costs you to downshift is cheaper than brakes.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2008 | 12:30 PM
  #8  
dirtydewey's Avatar
dirtydewey
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by joewitafro
Depends. on my car for example (mk3 supra with maft pro piggyback).. when I downshift and decell, my AFR's spike to 22.3, which means it cut the injectors of their fuel. And actually saves me gas compared to throwing it in neutral and letting the car idle as I brake.
A lot of cars will go "full lean" at 0% throttle
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2008 | 12:35 PM
  #9  
SC30096's Avatar
SC30096
Pole Position
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
From: Alberta
Default

the wasting gas is only during the initial point of when you must press on the gas to match engine speed..but while its in gear and your slowing down you are not wasting gas the high rpms is just the engine speed but your foot is not on the gas so therefore it would just be as if you were idling.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2008 | 03:22 PM
  #10  
Luke_in_SD's Avatar
Luke_in_SD
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 635
Likes: 1
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by dirtydewey
Here's some simple logic..... Commercial drivers in their 20,000 pound tractor trailers do this. They drive for a living.
The pennies it costs you to downshift is cheaper than brakes.
They use something called a J-brake, where the tractor slows down when they let off the gas.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2008 | 07:37 PM
  #11  
SC300T's Avatar
SC300T
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,205
Likes: 1
From: Ohio
Default

Definitely saves gas.... Mixture goes full lean, and associated EGT drops quickly. Idle circuit then engages around 1200-1400rpm. If you're decelerating in gear from around 2500rpm down to 1800rpm, your injector duty is zero. There is no fuel being used at this point in time. You're also saving brakes, but perhaps creating a touch more clutch wear.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2008 | 07:38 PM
  #12  
topdog849's Avatar
topdog849
Lead Lap
15 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 441
Likes: 2
From: VA
Default

Originally Posted by Lex-Fiend
It wastes gas, of course, but it slows the car down, meaning your brakes don't work as hard and will last longer, or so I've heard.
yea your brakes will last longer but the clutch wont. id rather replace my brakes any day then have to get another clutch
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2008 | 10:04 PM
  #13  
tttp5's Avatar
tttp5
Pole Position
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
From: dallas, tx
Default

but doesn't down shifting put more wear on the engine as it has to work at higher rpms even if your foot was off the gas pedal?

and if u had a turbo its no good for a turbo either correct?
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2008 | 12:38 AM
  #14  
kyoso23's Avatar
kyoso23
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,161
Likes: 6
From: AZ
Default

Injectors cycle to "0" (or really close to it) when the throttle is closed.


/thread
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2008 | 10:11 AM
  #15  
vwynn's Avatar
vwynn
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,945
Likes: 53
From: CA
Default

from what ive been researching.. Engine braking used lil to virtually no fuel at all.. the only reason why the car "revs" up that high is because of the tires spinning and lower gear. also the higher rev sound comes from the cylinders pumping faster. but using lil to less fuel. the car's ecu will cut fuel n yea.. zero fuel usage...

the onlydownside from what ive read is... when revs go up.. more engine wear is present... so its a trade off i guess..

but ive always wondered... what about auto tranny?
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:23 AM.