Notices
SC - 1st Gen (1992-2000)

Do I really want a Supra?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 21, 2006 | 02:32 AM
  #1  
bigmalik00's Avatar
bigmalik00
Thread Starter
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,131
Likes: 1
From: MD
Default Do I really want a Supra?

I have seen plenty since joining this forum. Some thing informative and some things disturbing. I love my SC, because of its sporty looks and luxury. Some of my club mates have seem to be in some type of "I really wanted a Supra" denial. If this is the case instead of modding a Lexus to Supra Specs and looks....why not buy a Supra?
https://www.clublexus.com/forums/sho...d.php?t=217828

this was the needle that broke the camel's back. Don't get me wrong I love Supras but I am really curious if any club mates really enjoy these Supra “like” mods (outside of engine swaps) or do you really want a Supra?
Reply
Old May 21, 2006 | 02:42 AM
  #2  
cliffud's Avatar
cliffud
Former Vendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,700
Likes: 3
From: away from keyboard
Default

i really want a supra... REALLY REALLY REALLY want one...

interestingly enough- there are 7... SEVEN SC300's for sale in the classifieds right now.
Reply
Old May 21, 2006 | 08:40 AM
  #3  
Cannonbear's Avatar
Cannonbear
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,240
Likes: 0
From: California
Default

i want a supra. But i will not pay tens of thousands over what its worth for a turbo supra to own one, nor will i pay a few thousand over what they're worth for an NA, espicially when they're usually in **** condition.
Reply
Old May 21, 2006 | 08:42 AM
  #4  
Danimal's Avatar
Danimal
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 459
Likes: 0
From: Indiana
Default

I used to think I wanted one, until I saw the glory of the SC . Althought a TT Motor and some suspension stuff wouldn't hurt. The SC blends in a lot better in traffic, and that's what I'm aiming for. Less attention = better (to me at least)
Reply
Old May 21, 2006 | 09:55 AM
  #5  
Drocay's Avatar
Drocay
Pole Position
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
From: va
Default

i dont want a supra, i want a Sc400 with 2j in engine bay for me thats about as sexy as it gets.
Reply
Old May 21, 2006 | 11:52 AM
  #6  
TRD_Power's Avatar
TRD_Power
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,527
Likes: 78
From: Crappy ol' Texas
Default

Originally Posted by Drocay
i dont want a supra, i want a Sc400 with 2j in engine bay for me thats about as sexy as it gets.
Why not a 300?
Reply
Old May 21, 2006 | 12:12 PM
  #7  
Ice350's Avatar
Ice350
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 11,349
Likes: 7
From: Florida
Default

Not me.
First, a really nice Supra is hard to find. WHen you do they want more than it's worth.
Next, to me a modded sc looks netter than a supra. That look going down the road is boss.
Last, building the sc to supra type performance should be more rewarding when it's done.

Both great cars but I lean more toward sport luxury. I would jump on the supra as a second car, though.
Reply
Old May 21, 2006 | 12:52 PM
  #8  
rscott's Avatar
rscott
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,468
Likes: 0
From: California
Default

i used to have an NA supra. i can honestly say i like my SC ALOT more than the supra. owning a TT would be a completely different story though.
Reply
Old May 21, 2006 | 01:55 PM
  #9  
Drocay's Avatar
Drocay
Pole Position
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
From: va
Default

Originally Posted by TRD_Power
Why not a 300?
Cuz i dont have a 300. HAHA.
Reply
Old May 21, 2006 | 06:25 PM
  #10  
Supra Dr's Avatar
Supra Dr
Moving SC Threads
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,759
Likes: 168
From: Pa
Default

Originally Posted by rscott
i used to have an NA supra. i can honestly say i like my SC ALOT more than the supra. owning a TT would be a completely different story though.
Why not have it ALL?

For these reasons & more is why I built my car.

Reasons for NOT having a supra:
Hate climing up to get out.
Anybody w/ wheels (2 or 4) wants to race you.
No room for my sons car seat.
No real trunk
No wood grain accents - GOTTA love the wood.
Draws unwanted attn. (reads law enforcement)
Targa tops are a P.I.A. & when off you have NO trunk.
AND
"its THAT car from the MOVIE" PUKE!
that statement alone will keep me from buying one.

I'll fix them, just wont own one.
Reply
Old May 21, 2006 | 06:30 PM
  #11  
DETUNED's Avatar
DETUNED
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,252
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Default

I'd rather have a Supra than a built SC. ****, I had a built single full APU 6 speed SC, and I woul dhave traded it for a stock twin 6 speed supra. Supras will always hold there values and be worth money, SCs only depreciate.

Even though I sold my SC, I still couldn't afford a stock 6 speed supra in good condition, so i bought a 4 door .
Reply
Old May 21, 2006 | 06:44 PM
  #12  
Sleeper97's Avatar
Sleeper97
Lead Lap
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 520
Likes: 2
From: New York
Default

I use to own a 1997 SC300 5spd , red before selling it for the Supra. Comming from an integra the Sc300 felt huge and heavy and definitely feels like the 2jZ-GE motor needs more power to pull 3500lbs. , but it was a definite upgrade in luxury and performance potential. My problem was that i am not ready for a luxury car yet and more into full sport performance.Both cars have their advantages and disadvantages, also knowing the Supra was one of my favorite cars growing up, to be able to own one is a great feeling.

The SC will give you luxury and performance but major upgrades must be considered for serious performance such as 2jZ-GTE or NA-T. and also brake upgrades, but you get luxury and can sit passengers more comfortably, not sure about the back seats.

The Supra TT, you get the whole performance package, Toyota did not go cheap on any of the parts in this car, top of the line Transmission capable of holding more than decent power. A motor that is considered legendary in performance and reliability, also the car is one of the most exotic cars that ever came out of Japan to hit U.S. Shores, downside is you cant turn a Supra into a luxury car but you can turn an SC300 into a performance car with the right amount of modifications but can be costly.

THE SC




The Supra


Last edited by Sleeper97; May 21, 2006 at 06:56 PM.
Reply
Old May 21, 2006 | 08:33 PM
  #13  
SCoupe's Avatar
SCoupe
Lexus Test Driver
CL Folding 25,000
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 887
Likes: 0
From: California
Default

Sleeper, that's a great summary. btw, both of those rides are awesome looking.
Reply
Old May 21, 2006 | 10:11 PM
  #14  
skpark70's Avatar
skpark70
Pole Position
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,102
Likes: 18
From: Washington
Default

Actually I was looking to purchase Supra TT but availability and price I opt for SC and I NEVER looked back, Im very pleased with my decision.

Even some supra owners have seen and drove my turbo SC they want to get one.
Reply
Old May 21, 2006 | 10:39 PM
  #15  
scsrock's Avatar
scsrock
Pole Position
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
From: Washington
Default

A friend of mine has a powerful Supra (700HP), but he was still jealous when he heard the SC sound system. He got his '96 Supra TT for $35K in 2002 (with additional 30K in mods later), I got mine ('94 5-sp SC300) for 9.5K in 2003 (no mods yet).

I thought I would never use Supra parts, but just found out the KYB AGX shocks are only available for Supra. Too bad.

I am jealous when I see nicer SC's ... motivation for me to do something to mine ... so my next car will be 1-owner '98 5-sp SC300 (50K miles), though only no-brain person would sell such a car.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:05 PM.